Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 155, Issue 2, pp 479–494 | Cite as

Shame on You: When Materialism Leads to Purchase Intentions Toward Counterfeit Products

  • Alexander Davidson
  • Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno
  • Michel LarocheEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

In recent years, counterfeiting has grown exponentially and has now become a grave economic problem. The acquisition of counterfeits poses an ethical dilemma as it benefits the buyer and illegal seller at the cost of the legitimate producer and with fewer taxes being paid throughout the supply chain. Previous research reveals inconsistent and sometimes inconclusive findings regarding whether materialism is associated, positively or negatively, with intentions to purchase counterfeits. The current research seeks to resolve these inconsistencies by investigating previously ignored interactions between three variables: risk of embarrassment, counterfeit detectability and product conspicuousness. First, risk of embarrassment mediates the relationship between materialism and counterfeit purchase intentions. Specifically, materialism negatively predicts counterfeit purchase intentions as mediated by risk of embarrassment. Second, this relationship only holds when the counterfeit can be easily detected. When it is not easily detected, materialism instead leads to positive purchase intentions. Third, these positive effects can be offset when the product is not highly visible. This research has important implications for marketers, manufacturers and academics and contributes to better understanding the antecedents of counterfeit purchases.

Keywords

Materialism Risk of embarrassment Intention to purchase counterfeits Product conspicuousness Counterfeit detectability 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Each author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Bian, X., Haque, S., & Smith, A. (2015). Social power, product visibility, and the demand for luxury brand counterfeit products. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(1), 37–54.Google Scholar
  2. Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2009). An investigation of determinants of counterfeit purchase consideration. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 368–378.Google Scholar
  3. Browne, B. A., & Kaldenberg, D. O. (1997). Conceptualizing self-monitoring: Links to materialism and product involvement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  4. CBP. (2015). U.S. customers and border protection. Access December 2, 2015, from http://www.cbp.gov
  5. Cesareo, L., & Stöttinger, B. (2015). United we stand, divided we fall: How firms can engage consumers in their fight against counterfeits. Business Horizons, 58(5), 527–537.Google Scholar
  6. Chaudhry, P. E., Zimmerman, A., Peters, J. R., & Cordell, V. V. (2009). Preserving intellectual property rights: Managerial insight into the escalating counterfeit market quandary. Business Horizons, 52(1), 57–66.Google Scholar
  7. Christopher, A. N., & Schlenker, B. R. (2004). Materialism and affect: The role of self-presentational concerns. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 260–272.Google Scholar
  8. Chuchinprakarn, S. (2003). Consumption of counterfeit goods in Thailand: Who are the patrons. European Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 48–53.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, P., & Cohen, J. (1996). Research monographs in adolescence. Life values and adolescent mental health. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Cordell, V. V., Wongtada, N., & Kieschnick, R. L. (1996). Counterfeit purchase intentions: Role of lawfulness attitudes and product traits as determinants. Journal of Business Research, 35(1), 41–53.Google Scholar
  11. Dabholkar, P. A. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100–118.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, A. (2012). These Hilariously bad knock-offs are on sale in China. Accessed October 16, 2015, from http://www.businessinsider.com/hilariously-bad-chinese-knock-offs-of-famous-american-and-european-brands-2012-8
  13. Duriez, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & De Witte, H. (2007). The social costs of extrinsic relative to intrinsic goal pursuits: Their relation with social dominance and racial and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Personality, 75(4), 757–782.Google Scholar
  14. Furnham, A., & Valgeirsson, H. (2007). The effect of life values and materialism on buying counterfeit products. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(5), 677–685.Google Scholar
  15. Gino, F., Norton M. I., & Ariely D. (2010). The counterfeit self: The deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science, 21, 712–720.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., & Clark, R. A. (2012). Materialistic, brand engaged and status consuming consumers and clothing behaviors. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 102–119.Google Scholar
  17. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.Google Scholar
  18. Havoscope. (2015). Global black market information. Access December 2, 2015, from http://www.havocscope.com
  19. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Heffes, E. M. (2008). Protecting your brand: Fending off pirates. Financial Executive, 24(2), 40–43.Google Scholar
  21. Hilton, B., Choi, C. J., & Chen, S. (2004). The ethics of counterfeiting in the fashion industry: Quality, credence and profit issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4), 343–352.Google Scholar
  22. Hoe, L., Hogg, G., & Hart, S. (2003). Fakin’ it: Counterfeiting and consumer contradictions. E-European Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 60–67.Google Scholar
  23. Hung, K. P., Huiling Chen, A., Peng, N., Hackley, C., Amy Tiwsakul, R., & Chou, C. L. (2011). Antecedents of luxury brand purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 20(6), 457–467.Google Scholar
  24. ICC. (2016). Counterfeiting Intelligence Bureau. Accessed August 10, 2016, from http://www.iccwbo.org/products-and-services/fighting-commercial-crime/counterfeiting-intelligence-bureau/
  25. IP Crime Report. (2013/14). IP crime report. Accessed August 10, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/374283/ipcreport13.PDF
  26. Kasser, T. (2016). Materialistic values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 489–514.Google Scholar
  27. Kilbourne, W. E., & LaForge, M. C. (2010). Materialism and its relationship to individual values. Psychology & Marketing, 27(8), 780–798.Google Scholar
  28. Kozar, J. M., & Marcketti, S. B. (2011). Examining ethics and materialism with purchase of counterfeits. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 393–404.Google Scholar
  29. Lai, K. K. Y., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). Brand imitation: Do the Chinese have different views? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16(2), 179–192.Google Scholar
  30. Liao, C. H., & Hsieh, I. Y. (2013). Determinants of consumer’s willingness to purchase gray-market smartphones. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 409–424.Google Scholar
  31. Lu, L. C., & Lu, C. J. (2010). Moral philosophy, materialism, and consumer ethics: An exploratory study in Indonesia. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 193–210.Google Scholar
  32. Muncy, J. A., & Eastman, J. K. (1998). Materialism and consumer ethics: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 137–145.Google Scholar
  33. Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2015). The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 654–664.Google Scholar
  34. Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2017). When materialists intend to resist consumption: The moderating role of self-control and long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2792-0.
  35. NetNames. (2015). Counting the cost of counterfeiting: A NetNames report. Accessed August 10, 2016, from https://www.netnames.com/assets/shared/whitepaper/pdf/NetNames-Counterfeiting-Report-A4-2015.pdf
  36. Nia, A., & Lynne Zaichkowsky, J. (2000). Do counterfeits devalue the ownership of luxury brands? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(7), 485–497.Google Scholar
  37. OECD. (1998). The economic impact of counterfeiting. Accessed August 10, 2016, from https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/2090589.pdf
  38. Penz, E., & Stottinger, B. (2005). Forget the” real” thing-take the copy! An explanatory model for the volitional purchase of counterfeit products. Advances in Consumer Research, 32, 568.Google Scholar
  39. Pham, T. H., Yap, K., & Dowling, N. A. (2012). The impact of financial management practices and financial attitudes on the relationship between materialism and compulsive buying. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 461–470.Google Scholar
  40. Phau, I., Sequeira, M., & Dix, S. (2009). Consumers’ willingness to knowingly purchase counterfeit products. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 262–281.Google Scholar
  41. Phau, I., & Teah, M. (2009). Devil wears (counterfeit) Prada: A study of antecedents and outcomes of attitudes towards counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
  42. Pirog, S. F., & Roberts, J. A. (2007). Personality and credit card misuse among college students: The mediating role of impulsiveness. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 65–77.Google Scholar
  43. Ponchio, M. C., & Aranha, F. (2008). Materialism as a predictor variable of low income consumer behavior when entering into installment plan agreements. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
  44. Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209–219.Google Scholar
  45. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303.Google Scholar
  46. Segev, S., Shoham, A., & Gavish, Y. (2015). A closer look into the materialism construct: The antecedents and consequences of materialism and its three facets. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 32(2), 85–98.Google Scholar
  47. Sinha, R. K., & Mandel, N. (2008). Preventing digital music piracy: The carrot or the stick? Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  48. Sirgy, M. J., Gurel-Atay, E., Webb, D., Cicic, M., Husic, M., Ekici, A., et al. (2012). Linking advertising, materialism, and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 107(1), 79–101.Google Scholar
  49. Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances, private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  50. Staake, T., Thiesse, F., & Fleisch, E. (2009). The emergence of counterfeit trade: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing, 43(3/4), 320–349.Google Scholar
  51. Sun, G., D’Alessandro, S., & Johnson, L. (2014). Traditional culture, political ideologies, materialism and luxury consumption in China. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(6), 578–585.Google Scholar
  52. Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2009). Faking it: Personality and individual difference predictors of willingness to buy counterfeit goods. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(5), 820–825.Google Scholar
  53. Tom, G., Garibaldi, B., Zeng, Y., & Pilcher, J. (1998). Consumer demand for counterfeit goods. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 405–421.Google Scholar
  54. Turnage, M. (2013). A mind-blowing number of counterfeit goods come from China. Accessed November 3, 2015, from http://www.businessinsider.com/most-counterfeit-goods-are-from-china-2013-6
  55. Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., DeWall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Bartels, J. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 56.Google Scholar
  56. Veloutsou, C., & Bian, X. (2008). A cross-national examination of consumer perceived risk in the context of non-deceptive counterfeit brands. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
  57. Wan, W. W., Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H., Alan, C. B., Sin, L. Y., Kwong, K. K., et al. (2009). Do traditional Chinese cultural values nourish a market for pirated CDs? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 185–196.Google Scholar
  58. Watson, J. J. (2003). The relationship of materialism to spending tendencies, saving, and debt. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(6), 723–739.Google Scholar
  59. Watson, D. C. (2015). Materialism and the five-factor model of personality: A facet-level analysis. North American Journal of Psychology, 17(1), 133.Google Scholar
  60. Wee, C. H., Ta, S. J., & Cheok, K. H. (1995). Non-price determinants of intention to purchase counterfeit goods: An exploratory study. International Marketing Review, 12(6), 19–46.Google Scholar
  61. Wilcox, K., Kim, H. M., & Sen, S. (2009). Why do consumers buy counterfeit luxury brands? Journal of Marketing Research, 46(2), 247–259.Google Scholar
  62. Yoo, B., & Lee, S. H. (2009). Buy genuine luxury fashion products or counterfeits. Advances in Consumer Research, 36(1), 280.Google Scholar
  63. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Concordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.HEC MontrealMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations