Sense-Making Resource Efficiency Through “Sustainability” Reports
- 299 Downloads
This paper explores the nature and antecedents of a unique “sustainability” reporting initiative developed within a large Australian family-run manufacturing company. In so doing, the paper responds to calls for empirical insight into how accounting can inform organisational objectives relating to sustainability. Despite known flaws in the data, the company’s weekly sustainability reports had become a critical support to on-going sense-making, driven by deliberate strategies focused on resource efficiency, and understanding the business. While the contributions of these initiatives to broader global sustainability concerns were limited, the case provides insight into a well-intentioned and passionate journey towards the unknown of sustainability. The case explains how management distinguished related activities from core economic objectives. What is important here is that the CEO availed space for management to explore the moral dimensions of corporate activity. There was opportunity to now enhance that space, by encouraging engagement with a broader range of stakeholders, and a broader range of sustainability impacts.
KeywordsSustainability Sustainability accounting Sustainability reporting Sense-making
The author wishes to acknowledge comments provided on earlier iterations of this paper from delegates attending Monforma in Melbourne in February 2015, a Jill McKinnon seminar at Macquarie University in Sydney in 2015, a seminar at Royal Holloway, University of London, in 2015, and at the 14th Australasian Centre on Social and Environmental Accounting Research Conference (A-CSEAR), in Sydney in December 2015.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The author has no financial relationship, and otherwise no known potential conflict of interest, with the case study organisation explored in this study. In this study, semi-structured interviews have been undertaken with adult human participants, all of whom provided informed consent to be interviewed. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The author has full control of all primary data which are available to the journal to review if requested.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking. Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership. Knowing, doing and being (pp. 3–19). SAGE Publications Inc, Harvard University USA.Google Scholar
- Bakan, J. (2005). The corporation. The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
- Bebbington, J. (2014). Accounting for sustainable development performance. Oxford: CIMA.Google Scholar
- Bebbington, J., & Fraser, M. (2014). Organizational change and sustainability accounting. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 141–153). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Introduction to sustainability accounting and accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 3–14). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bennett, M., & James, P. (1998). The green bottom line. In M. Bennett, & P. James (Eds.), The green bottom line. Environmental accounting for management. Current practices and future trends (pp. 30–60). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
- Business Review Weekly (BRW). (2013) Top 1,000 companies. Accessed on 16 May 2014. Available from: http://www.brw.com.au/lists/top-1000-companies/2013/;jsessionid=72D58D3F29585D525AAA71423961524E.
- Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
- Dillard, J. (2014). Legitimating the social accounting project: An ethic of accountability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 233–248). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Duncan, O. and Thomson, I. (1998). Waste accounting and cleaner technology: A complex evaluation. In Asian Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
- Fries, J., McCulloch, K., & Webster, W. (2010). The Prince’s accounting for sustainability project: Creating 21st-century decision-making and reporting systems to respond to 21st-century challenges and opportunities. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 29–45). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Gray, R., & Bebbington, J. (2001). Accounting for the environment (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
- Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2000). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Smith, R., & Lambell, J. (1997). Accounting for the environment: The role of strategic management accounting. Management Accounting: Magazine for Chartered Management Accountants, 75(2), 34–35.Google Scholar
- Spence, L. J., & Rinaldi, L. (2010). Sainsbury’s: Embedding sustainability within the supermarket supply chain. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability. Practical insights (pp. 47–71). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Thomson, I. (2014). Mapping the terrain of sustainability and accounting for sustainability. In J. Bebbington, J. Unerman, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 15–30). Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Thomson, I., & Georgakopoulos, G. (2010). Building from the bottom, inspired from the top: Accounting for sustainability and the environment agency. In A. G. Hopwood, J. Unerman, & J. Fries (Eds.), Accounting for sustainability Practical insights (pp. 129–147). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. Accessed: 18 March 2012. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/publications/publications.htm.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar