Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 154, Issue 3, pp 829–846 | Cite as

How Far the TBL Concept of Sustainable Entrepreneurship Extends Beyond the Various Sustainability Regulations: Can Greek Food Manufacturing Enterprises Sustain Their Hybrid Nature Over Time?

  • Theodore TarnanidisEmail author
  • Jason Papathanasiou
  • Demetres Subeniotis
Original Paper

Abstract

This study presents the design and selected results of a comprehensive research on measuring the concept of sustainable entrepreneurship. We used the methodology of conjoint analysis and developed a hierarchical framework that lists all the multi-attributes that exist in the triple bottom line concept. In doing so, we collected data from 150 Greek food companies. The multi-attributes were categorized and ranked into the following four headings: internal social values (ISV), external social values (ESV), environmental values (ENV) and economic values (ECV). Specifically, we found that the creation of values that improve the safety and hygiene issues of products to consumers is the most important attribute for the ISV domain. Respectively, the most important attribute for the ESV domain is the creation of values that impact on the local economy. Accordingly, the creation of values for minimizing environmental impacts was found as the most important attribute for the ENV domain. And lastly, the establishment of ECV that increase long-run profitability was identified as the most important for the ECV dimension. Finally, all the categorized values offer rich feedback for entrepreneurship scholars and parishioners. And, to that extent, our findings are slightly different from those reported in previous researches to other contexts, as we have managed to build an aggregated instrument that promotes the hybrid nature of food companies towards international development.

Keywords

Sustainable entrepreneurship (SE) Hierarchical structuring Conjoint analysis Food industry Greece 

References

  1. Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., & Day, G. S. (2004). Marketing research. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, R. J. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22(3), 501–515.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, A. R. (1998). Cultivating the garden of Eden: Environmental entrepreneur. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 135–144.Google Scholar
  4. Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  6. Belz, F. M., & Peattie, K. (2012). Sustainability marketing: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Binder, J. K., & Belz, F. M. (2013). Sustainable entrepreneurial processes: An explorative investigation. Munchen: Technische Universitat, TUM School of Management.Google Scholar
  8. Bizbiroulas, T., & Rotsios, K. (2014). The Greek food product exports: Challenges and opportunities an interview with Mr Dimitrios Lakasas. Journal of the American Farm School of Thessaloniki, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  9. Bos, A. (2002). Sustainable entrepreneurship in a changing Europe: Pedagogy of ethics for corporate organization in transformation. In G. F. Simons, D. Min, et al. (Eds.), EuroDiversity: A business guide to managing differences. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bull, M. (2008). Challenging tensions: Critical, theoretical and empirical perspectives on social enterprise. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 14(5), 268–275.Google Scholar
  12. Cameron, K. D., Bright, D., & Caza, A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 1–24.Google Scholar
  13. Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Chick, A. (2009). Green entrepreneurship: A sustainable development Challenge. In R. Mellor, G. Coulton, A. Chick, A. Bifulco, N. Mellor, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Entrepreneurship for everyone: A student textbook (pp. 139–150). London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, B., Smith, B., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Toward of sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 107–119.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  18. Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2009). Measuring socially sustainable urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD), Oxford Brooks University.Google Scholar
  19. Crals, E., & Vereeck, L. (2004). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: Theory and practice. In Conference proceedings in 3rd global conference on environmental justice and global citizenship, February 12–14, 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  20. Crals, E., & Vereeck, L. (2005). The affordability of sustainable entrepreneurship certification for SMEs. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(2), 173–183.Google Scholar
  21. Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environment degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 50–76.Google Scholar
  22. Decker, R., & Hermelbracht, A. (2006). Planning and evaluation of new academic library services by means of web-based conjoint analysis. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(6), 558–572.Google Scholar
  23. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. Stanford University, Draft Report for the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  24. Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2002). Strategic tools for social entrepreneurs: Enhancing the performance of your enterprising non-profit. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Denzin, N. K. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. Ιnternational Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 417–436.Google Scholar
  27. Duquenne, M.-N., & Vlontzos, G. (2014). The impact of the Greek crisis on the consumers’ behaviour: Some initial evidences. British Food Journal, 16(6), 890–903.Google Scholar
  28. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line for 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  29. European Commission. (2010). The economic adjustment programme for Greece. Occasional papers No 68. Brussels.Google Scholar
  30. European Commission. (2012). Flash barometer No. 354: Entrepreneurship country report Greece. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  31. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732.Google Scholar
  32. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Sanchez-Hernandez, I. (2014). Measuring corporate social responsibility for competitive success at a regional level. Journal of Cleaner Production, 72, 14–22.Google Scholar
  33. Garcia-Alvarez, E., & Lopez-Sintas, J. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14(3), 209–230.Google Scholar
  34. Gibb, A. A. (1996). Entrepreneurship and small business management: Can we afford to neglect them in the twenty-first business schools? British Journal of Management, 7(4), 309–322.Google Scholar
  35. Gibbs, D. (2009). Sustainability entrepreneurs, ecopreneurs and the development of a sustainable economy. Greener Management International, 55, 63–78.Google Scholar
  36. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. G. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448.Google Scholar
  39. Haugh, H. (2005). A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Herrmann, B., & Kritikos, A. S. (2013). Growing out of the crisis: Hidden assets to Greece’ transition to an innovation economy. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 2(14), 1–23.Google Scholar
  41. Hockerts, K., & Wustenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Golliaths versus Emerging Davids: Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481–492.Google Scholar
  42. Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Janssen Groesbeek, M. (2001). Sustainable entrepreneurship—Theory, practice, instruments. Amsterdam: Business Contact.Google Scholar
  44. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.Google Scholar
  45. Jolink, A., & Niesten, E. (2015). Sustainable development and business model of entrepreneurs in the organic food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 386–401.Google Scholar
  46. Katsimi, M., & Moutos, T. (2010). EMU and the Greek crisis: The political-economy perspective. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 568–576.Google Scholar
  47. Krueger, N. F., Jr. (2005). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Broadening the definition of opportunity. In Conference proceedings in 19th national conference of United States Association for small business and entrepreneurship (USABE), January 13–16, 2005, California, USA.Google Scholar
  48. Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2009). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions-investigating the role of a business experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 524–539.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Lehmann, M., Cristensen, P., & Larsen, M. (2005). Self-regulation and new institutions. The case of green networks in Denmark. In S. Sharma & A. Aragon-Correa (Eds.), Corporate environmental strategy and competitive advanatage (pp. 286–308). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Louviere, J. J., Street, D., Burgess, L., Wasi, N., Islam, T., & Marley, A. (2008). Modeling the choice of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiments designs with extra preference information. Journal of Choice Modelling, 1(1), 128–164.Google Scholar
  52. Mahalik, N. P., & Nambiar, A. N. (2010). Trends in food packaging and manufacturing systems and technology. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 21(2), 117–128.Google Scholar
  53. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2000). Measuring corporate citizenship in two countries: The case of the United States and France. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(3), 283–297.Google Scholar
  54. Majid, I. A., & Koe, W. L. (2012). Sustainable Entrepreneurship (SE): A revised model based on the triple bottom line (TBL). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 293–310.Google Scholar
  55. Matsaganis, M., & Leventi, C. (2013). The distributional impact of the Greek crisis in 2010. Fiscal Studies, 24(1), 83–108.Google Scholar
  56. Millstone, E., & Lang, T. (2003). The atlas of food: Who eats what, where and why. London: Earthscan & Myriad Editions Limited.Google Scholar
  57. Myers, J. H., & Mullet, G. M. (2003). Managerial applications of multivariate analysis in marketing. New York: Thomson Business and Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Neville, M. (2008). Positive deviance on the ethical continuum: Green Mountain Coffee as a case study in conscientious capitalism. Business and Society Review, 113(4), 555–576.Google Scholar
  59. Nicolopoulou, K. (2014). Social entrepreneurship between cross-currents: Toward a framework for theoretical restructuring of the field. Journal of Small Business and Management, 52(4), 678–702.Google Scholar
  60. Notta, O., Vlachvei, A., & Samathrakis, V. (2010). Competitiveness—The case of Greek food manufacturing firms. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(7), 211–225.Google Scholar
  61. O’Neil, G. D., Jr., Hershauer, J. C., & Golden, J. S. (2009). The cultural context of sustainability entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 55, 33–46.Google Scholar
  62. Pachecco, T. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464–480.Google Scholar
  63. Paredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65.Google Scholar
  64. Parrish, B. (2010). Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: Principles of organization design. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 510–523.Google Scholar
  65. Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(4), 631–652.Google Scholar
  66. Pol, M. V., & Ryan, M. (1996). Using conjoint analysis to establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables. British Food Journal, 98(8), 5–12.Google Scholar
  67. Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57.Google Scholar
  68. Quazi, A. M., & O’Brien, D. (2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 33–51.Google Scholar
  69. Rajasekaran, B. (2013). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Past researcher and future directions. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 2(1), 12–19.Google Scholar
  70. Rice, G. (2006). Pro-environmental behaviour in Egypt: Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390.Google Scholar
  71. Richomme-Huet, K., & Freyman, J. D. (2011). What sustainable entrepreneurship looks like: An exploratory study from a student perspective. In Conference proceedings in 56th annual international council for small business (ICSB), World Conference, June 15–18, 2011, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  72. Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., & Burton, M. (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable practice. Ecological Economics, 39, 463–478.Google Scholar
  73. Rowan, N., & Wulff, D. (2007). Using qualitative methods to inform scale development. The Qualitative Report, 12(3), 450–466.Google Scholar
  74. Ruvio, A. A., & Shoham, A. (2011). A multilevel study of nascent social ventures. International Small Business Journal, 29, 562–579.Google Scholar
  75. Sands, G., & Podmore, T. (2000). A generalized environmental sustainability index for agricultural systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 79, 29–41.Google Scholar
  76. Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework of ecopreneurship. Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45–58.Google Scholar
  77. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.Google Scholar
  78. Schaper, M. (2002). The essence of ecopreneurship. In M. Shaper (Ed.), Environmental entrepreneurship: Greener Management International (GMI). Greenleaf: Sheffield.Google Scholar
  79. Schneider, B., Wheeler, J. K., & Cox, J. F. (1992). A passion for service using content analysis to explicate service climate themes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 705–716.Google Scholar
  80. Sharma, S. (1996). Appied multivariate techniques. Toronto: Willey.Google Scholar
  81. Silverman, D. (2000). Doing a qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  83. Sydorovych, O., & Wossink, A. (2008). The measure of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Agricultural Systems, 98, 10–20.Google Scholar
  84. Tagkalakis, A. O. (2015). Fiscal, policy, net exports, and the sectoral composition of output in Greece. International Economics and Economic Policy, 12(4), 521–529.Google Scholar
  85. Tansey, G., & Worsley, T. (1995). The food system: A Guide. London.Google Scholar
  86. Tarnanidis, T., Papathanasiou, J., & Subeniotis, D. (2016). Critical success factors in the TBL concept of sustainable entrepreneurship. International Journal of Decision Support Systems, 2(1–3), 38–53.Google Scholar
  87. Thomson, N., Kiefer, K., & York, J. G. (2011). Distinctions not dichotomies: Exploring social, sustainable, and envrinmental entrepreneurship. In G. T. Lumpkin & J. A. Katz (Eds.), Social and sustainable entrepreneurship (Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth) (pp. 201–229). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  88. Tilley, F., & Young, W. (2009). Sustainability entrepreneurs: Could they be the true wealth generators of the future. Leeds: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  89. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 411–427.Google Scholar
  90. Van Calker, K. J., Berentsen, P., Giesen, G., & Huirne, R. (2005). Identifying and ranking attributes that determine sustainability in Dutch dairy farming. Agriculture and Human Values, 22(1), 53–63.Google Scholar
  91. Van de Ven, A. H., & Engleman, R. M. (2004). Event-and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 343–358.Google Scholar
  92. Waddock, S., & Post, J. E. (1991). Social entrepreneurs and catalytic change. Public Administration Review, 51(5), 393–401.Google Scholar
  93. Williams, N., & Vorley, T. (2015). The impact of institutional change on entrepreneurship in a crisis-hit economy: The case of Greece. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An international Journal, 27(1–2), 28–49.Google Scholar
  94. Woodfield, P. (2010). Sustainable entrepreneurship: More than corporate green. Paper presented at Conferrence proceedings in 7th International AGSE entrepreneurship research exchange, February 2–5, 2010.Google Scholar
  95. Zahra, S. A., Gedajkovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519–532.Google Scholar
  96. Zahra, S. A., Rawhouser, H. N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D. O., & Hayton, J. C. (2008). Globalization and social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(2), 117–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore Tarnanidis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jason Papathanasiou
    • 1
  • Demetres Subeniotis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of MacedoniaThessaloníkiGreece

Personalised recommendations