Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 813–824 | Cite as

Does Contact Between Employees and Service Recipients Lead to Socially More Responsible Behaviours? The Case of Cleaning

  • Placide Abasabanye
  • Franck Bailly
  • François-Xavier Devetter
Original Paper

Abstract

Cleaning occupations, which in recent years have accounted for a not inconsiderable share of employment and job creation in France, are characterised by particularly bad working conditions and low pay. Is this situation inevitable? Are there not in fact mechanisms that might lead employers in the cleaning sector to adopt socially more responsible behaviours towards their employees? After all, the literature on corporate social responsibility suggests that the actions of consumers could be one of these mechanisms. The aim of our paper is to test the impact on job quality of contact between cleaning workers and service recipients. To this end, we analyse data from a survey carried out by the French Ministry of Labour and supplemented by interviews. Our results indicate that contact with service recipients does indeed have an influence.

Keywords

Cleaning occupations Wages Service relation Job quality France 

References

  1. Abasabanye, P., Brolis, et., & Devetter, F.-X. (2015). La qualité des emplois en France: une analyse par les professions, Working paper, CLERSE, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Aguiar, L., & Herod, A. (2006). The dirty work of neoliberalism, cleaners in the global economy. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell .Google Scholar
  3. Bailly, F., Devetter, F.-X., & Horn, F. (2013). Can working and employment conditions in the personal services sector be improved ? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(2), 299–321.Google Scholar
  4. Barrois & Devetter (2012). Aides à domicile : un régime temporel non stabilisé qui témoigne des ambiguïtés d'une professionnalisation inachevée », Dossiers Solidarité et Santé, n°30.Google Scholar
  5. Baxter, J., Hewitt, B., & Western, M. (2009). Who uses paid domestic labor in Australia? choice and constraint in hiring household help. Feminist Economics, 15(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  6. Benelli, N. (2011). Divisions sexuelle et raciale du travail dans un sale boulot féminin. L’exemple du nettoyage en Suisse. Raison présente, 178, 95–104.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, O., & Nisim, S. (2015). The illegal as normative: Employment practices of cleaning companies in Israel as shaped by subcontractors’ organizational networks. Business Society, 54(5), 676–700.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, O., Nisim, S., & Segev, G. (2015). Corporate social responsibility as shaped by managers’ role dissonance: Cleaning services procurement in Israel. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 209–221.Google Scholar
  9. Brück, T., Haisken-DeNew, J., & Zimmermann, K. (2006). Creating low skilled jobs by subsidizing market-contracted household work. Applied Economics, 38(8), 899–911.Google Scholar
  10. Crifo, P., & Forget, V. (2015). The economics of corporate social responsibility: A firm-level perspective. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(1), 112–130.Google Scholar
  11. Cruz, S., & Abrantes, M. (2014). Service interaction and dignity in cleaning work: How important is the organizational context? Employee Relations, 36(3), 294–311.Google Scholar
  12. Delaunay, J.-C., & Gadrey, J. (1987). Les enjeux de la société de service (p. 333). Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences politiques.Google Scholar
  13. Devetter, F.-X. (2016a). Cleaners working time: A way to avoid minimum wage legislation. In 37th Annual conference of the international Working Party on Labour Market Segmentation, 6–8 July, 2016. Barcelona.Google Scholar
  14. Devetter, F.-X. (2016b). Can public policies bring about the democratization of the outsourcing of household tasks? Review of Radical Political Economics, 48(3), 365–393. doi:  10.1177/0486613415594159.Google Scholar
  15. Devetter, F.-X., & Lefebvre, M. (2015). Employment quality in the sector of personal and household services: Status and impact of public policies in France. In C. Carbonnier & N. Morel (Eds.), The political economy of household services in Europe (pp. 150–172). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Edwards, R., Gordon, D., & Reich, M. (1982). Segmented work, divided workers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. England, P., Budig, M., & Folbre, N. (2002). Wages of virtue: The relative pay of care work. Social Problems, 49(4), 455–473.Google Scholar
  18. Erickson, C., Fiskn, C., Milkman, R., Mitchell, D., & Wong, K. (2002). Justice for janitors in Los Angeles: Lessons from three rounds of negotiations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 543–567.Google Scholar
  19. Fakih, A., & Marrouch, W. (2012). Determinants of domestic workers’ employment: Evidence from lebanese household survey data. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6822.Google Scholar
  20. Falvey, R., & Gemmel, N. (1996). Are services income-elastic? Some new evidence. Review of Income and Wealth, 42(3), 257–269.Google Scholar
  21. Flipo, A., Fougère, D., & Olier, L. (2007). Is the household demand for in-home services sensitive to tax reductions? The French case. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 365–385.Google Scholar
  22. Folbre, N. (2006). Demanding quality: Worker/consumer coalitions and “high road” strategies in the care sector. Politics and society, 34(1), 11–31.Google Scholar
  23. Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (2006). The unmanageable consumer. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Gualbert, B. (2008). La question des ressources humaines toujours plus cruciale pour les entreprises de services à la personne. Les Cahiers du Crocis no 29, 42.Google Scholar
  25. Gualbert, B. (2009). Malgré les premiers effets de la crise, les chefs d’entreprises de services à la personne restent optimistes. Les Cahiers du Crocis,no 33, 46Google Scholar
  26. Hirsch, B., & Manzella, J. (2015). Who cares-and does it matter? Measuring the wage penalty for caring work. Research in Labor Economics, 40, 213–275.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, E. (1996). Le regard sociologique. Essais choisis: Textes rassemblés et présentés par Jean-Michel Chapoulie, Éditions de l’EHESS, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Hyytinen, A., Lundberg, S., & Toivanen, O. (2009). Politics and procurement: Evidence from cleaning contracts. Discussion Paper No. 277.Google Scholar
  29. Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84.Google Scholar
  30. Lainé, F., & Omalek, L. (2012). Les Métiers en 2020. DARES Analyses, 22, 16.Google Scholar
  31. Lanfranchi, J., & Narcy, M. (2008). Différence de satisfaction dans l’emploi entre les secteurs à but lucratif et à but non lucratif: Le rôle joué par les caractéristiques d’emploi. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 79(2), 323–368.Google Scholar
  32. Lloyd, C., Warhurst, C., & Dutton, E. (2013). The weakest link? product market strategies, skill and pay in the hotel industry. Work, Employment & Society, 27(2), 254–271.Google Scholar
  33. Lopez, S. (2010). Workers, managers, and customers triangles of power in work communities. Work and Occupations, 37(3), 251–271.Google Scholar
  34. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  35. Molinier, P. (2009). Des féministes et de leurs femmes de ménage: Entre réciprocité du care et souhait de dépersonnalisation. Multitudes, 2, 113–121.Google Scholar
  36. Nisim, S., & Benjamin, O. (2008). Power and size of firms as reflected in cleaning subcontractors’ practices of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 673–683.Google Scholar
  37. Nisim, S., & Benjamin, O. (2010). The speech of services procurement: The negotiated order of commodification and dehumanization of cleaning employees. Human Organization, 36(3), 221–232.Google Scholar
  38. Sherman, R. (2011). Beyond interaction customer influence on housekeeping and room service work in hotels. Work, Employment & Society, 25(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  39. Simonazzi, A. (2009). Care regimes and national employment models. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33(2), 211–232.Google Scholar
  40. Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the the nature and cause of the wealth of Nations. In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.) (vols. 2). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Soni-Sinha, U., & Yates, C. (2013). ‘Dirty work?’ Gender, race and the union in industrial cleaning. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(6), 737–751.Google Scholar
  42. Spencer, D. (2013). Promoting high quality work: Obstacles and opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 583–597.Google Scholar
  43. Suleman, F. (2015). The employment relationship in an (almost) structureless labour market: The case of domestic work. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(3), 733–750.Google Scholar
  44. Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  45. Weinkopf, C., Banyuls, J., & Grimshaw, D. (2013). Business cleaning. In D. Grimshaw (Ed.), Minimum wages, pay equity and comparative industrial relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Weyzig, F. (2009). Political and economic arguments for corporate social responsibility: Analysis and a proposition regarding the CSR Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 417–428.Google Scholar
  47. Zlolniski, Ch. (2003). Labor control and resistance of Mexican immigrant janitors in Silicon Valley. Human Organization, 62(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
  48. Zock, J.-P. (2005). World at work: Cleaners. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62, 581–584.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Placide Abasabanye
    • 1
  • Franck Bailly
    • 2
  • François-Xavier Devetter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LilleLilleFrance
  2. 2.University of RouenRouenFrance

Personalised recommendations