Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 691–705 | Cite as

How Does Ethical Leadership Trickle Down? Test of an Integrative Dual-Process Model

  • Zhen Wang
  • Haoying Xu
  • Yukun Liu
Original Paper

Abstract

Although the trickle-down effect of ethical leadership has been documented in the literature, its underlying mechanism still remains largely unclear. To address this gap, we develop a cross-level dual-process model to explain how the effect occurs. Drawing on social learning theory, we hypothesize that the ethical leadership of high-level managers could cascade to middle-level supervisors via its impact on middle-level supervisors’ two ethical expectations. Using a sample of 69 middle-level supervisors and 381 subordinates across 69 sub-branches from a large banking firm in China, we found that middle-level supervisors’ ethical efficacy expectation and unethical behavior–punishment expectation (as one form of ethical outcome expectations) accounted for the trickle-down effect. The explanatory role of middle-level supervisors’ ethical behavior–reward expectation (as the other form of ethical outcome expectations), however, was not supported. The theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Keywords

Ethical leadership Ethical efficacy expectation Ethical outcome expectation Social learning theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 71302129).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2012). The ethical climate and context of organizations: A comprehensive model. Organization Science, 23(6), 1767–1780.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tagney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442–461). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191–201.Google Scholar
  4. Ashkanasy, N. M., Windsor, C. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Bad apples in bad barrels revisited: Cognitive moral development, just world beliefs, rewards, and ethical decision making. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 449–473.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewwirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44.Google Scholar
  9. Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2015). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2625-1.Google Scholar
  10. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.Google Scholar
  11. Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 1–45.Google Scholar
  12. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Boatright, J. R. (2010). Finance ethics: Critical issues in theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 136–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2014). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 587–598.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, T. R. V., & Luthans, F. (1980). A social learning approach to organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 281–290.Google Scholar
  19. den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 409–434.Google Scholar
  20. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counterproductively in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993–1005.Google Scholar
  21. Fischbach, S. (2015). Ethical efficacy as a measure of training effectiveness: An application of the graphic novel case method versus traditional written case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 603–615.Google Scholar
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. E. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  23. Franke, G. R., Crown, D. F., & Spake, D. F. (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 920–934.Google Scholar
  24. Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. (2010). Moral potency: Building the capacity for character-based leadership. Consulting Psychological Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 291–310.Google Scholar
  25. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation and moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.Google Scholar
  26. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational science. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641.Google Scholar
  27. Hoobler, J., & Brass, D. (2006). Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1125–1133.Google Scholar
  28. James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309.Google Scholar
  29. Jaussi, K. S., & Dionne, S. D. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 475–498.Google Scholar
  30. Jennings, P. L., Mitchell, M. S., & Hannah, S. T. (2015). The moral self: A review and integration of the literature. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S104–S168.Google Scholar
  31. Kark, R., & Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to lead, motivation to follow: The role of the self-regulatory focus in leadership processes. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 500–528.Google Scholar
  32. Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  33. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence. The cognitive developmental approach to socialization. In D. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory (pp. 347–480). Chicago: RanMcNally.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, D., Choi, Y., Youn, S., & Chun, J. K. (2015). Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader–follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2689-y.Google Scholar
  35. Li, Y., & Sun, J. M. (2015). Traditional Chinese leadership and employee voice behavior: A cross-level examination. Leadership Quarterly, 26(2), 172–189.Google Scholar
  36. Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2011). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 107–123.Google Scholar
  37. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C. W., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434–1452.Google Scholar
  38. Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187–1212.Google Scholar
  39. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 105–113.Google Scholar
  40. May, D. R., Luth, M. T., & Schwoerer, C. E. (2013). The influence of business ethics education on moral efficacy, moral meaningfulness, and moral courage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  41. Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.Google Scholar
  42. Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell, M. S., & Palmer, N. F. (2010). The managerial relevance of ethical efficacy. In M. Schminke (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Managing the psychology of morality (pp. 89–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus users guide (7th ed). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
  45. Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948–965.Google Scholar
  46. Pan, Y., & Sparks, J. R. (2012). Predictors, consequence, and measurement of ethical judgments: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 84–91.Google Scholar
  47. Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetton & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organization: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Ruiz, P., Ruiz, C., & Martínez, R. (2011a). Improving the “leader-follower” relationship: Top manager or supervisor? The ethical leadership trickle-down effect on follower job response. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 587–608.Google Scholar
  50. Ruiz, P., Ruiz, C., & Martínez, R. (2011b). The cascading effect of top management’s ethical leadership: Supervisors or other lower-hierarchical level individuals? African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4755–4764.Google Scholar
  51. Ruiz-Palomino, P., Martínez-Ruiz, M. P., & Martínez-Cañas, R. (2013). Assessing ethical behaviours in the Spanish banking and insurance industries: Evidence and challenges. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(11), 2173–2196.Google Scholar
  52. Ruiz-Palomino, P., Ruiz-Amaya, C., & Knörr, H. (2011). Employee organizational citizenship behaviour: The direct and indirect impact of ethical leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28(3), 244–258.Google Scholar
  53. Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., et al. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1053–1078.Google Scholar
  54. Schaubroeck, J. M., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2016). Can peers’ ethical and transformational leadership improve coworkers’ service quality? A latent growth analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 133(1), 45–58.Google Scholar
  55. Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org/.
  56. Shao, P., Resick, C. J., & Schaubroeck, J. (2011). Ethical leadership and motivation: Examining promotion and prevention regulatory foci. In Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  57. Sims, R. R., & Brinkman, J. (2002). Leaders as moral role models: The case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 327–339.Google Scholar
  58. Sumanth, J., & Hannah, S. (2014). Developing leadership capacity: An integration and exploration of ethical and authentic leadership antecedents. In L. Neider & C. Schriesheim (Eds.), Advances in authentic and ethical leadership (pp. 25–74). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Sweeney, P. J., Imboden, M. W., & Hannah, S. (2015). Building moral strength: Bridging the moral judgment-action gap. New Directions for Student Leadership, 146, 17–33.Google Scholar
  60. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101–123.Google Scholar
  61. Tepper, B. I., & Taylor, E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 97–105.Google Scholar
  62. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69–83.Google Scholar
  63. Treviño, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2014). Ethical leadership. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 524–538). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Treviño, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.Google Scholar
  65. Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.Google Scholar
  66. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.Google Scholar
  67. Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.Google Scholar
  68. Venkataramani, V., Green, S. G., & Schleicher, D. J. (2010). Well-connected leaders: The impact of leaders’ social network ties on LMX and members’ work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1071–1084.Google Scholar
  69. Walker, L. J. (2004). Gus in the gap: Bridging the judgment-action gap in moral functioning. In D. Lapsley & D. N. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self and identity (pp. 1–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  70. Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 204–213.Google Scholar
  71. Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.Google Scholar
  72. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Agle, B. (2005). “Somebody I look up to”: Ethical role models in organzations. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 313–330.Google Scholar
  73. Weiss, H. M. (1977). Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior: The role of modeling in organizational socialization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19(1), 89–105.Google Scholar
  74. Wo, D. X. H., Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2015). What drives trickle-down effects? A test of multiple mediation processes. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1848–1868.Google Scholar
  75. Yaffe, T., & Kark, R. (2011). Leading by example: The case of leader OCB. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 806–826.Google Scholar
  76. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.Google Scholar
  77. Yukl, G., Mahsud, R., Hassan, S., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). An improved measure of ethical leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 20(1), 38–48.Google Scholar
  78. Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M. J., & Preacher, K. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Organization and Human Resources Management, Business SchoolCentral University of Finance and EconomicsBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Management and Organization, NUS Business SchoolNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations