Framing Social Problems in Social Entrepreneurship
- 1.1k Downloads
Social entrepreneurship (SE) is perceived as a legitimate and innovative solution to social problems. Yet, when one looks at the literature one finds that the social problems that the SE movement seeks to address and how these problems are identified and defined are not studied. This lack of attention to the defining of social problems in SE has implications for the domain for problems do not exist unless they are recognized and defined, and those that define problems have influence on how these will eventually be addressed. Our paper presents an analysis of framing activities in SE done by the actors involved in the development and promotion of the SE movement. Our analysis reveals that these actors are concerned with creating an ecosystem to support social entrepreneurs. Critical analysis of discourses of these actors reveals a powerful mobilization discourse, one that supports social entrepreneurs as the agents of change. We also find that as the SE movement emerged at the beginning of a cycle of protest against capitalist systems, their framing of SE as system changing of these very systems therefore finds strong resonance with a wide variety of actors.
KeywordsSocial entrepreneurship Social problems Social movement theory Framing processes Critical discourse analysis
- Arthur, L., Keenoy, T., Scott-Cato, M., & Smith, R. (2010). Where is the ‘social’ in social enterprise? In D. Fuller, A. E. G. Jonas, & R. Lee (Eds.), Interrogating alterity: Alternative economic and political spaces (pp. 207–222). Aldersho: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Ashoka. (2016). Ashoka: Innovators for the public. Accessed April 17, 2015. https://www.ashoka.org/.
- Brutsch, A. (2016). Inspiring social entrepreneurship: Hilde Schwab—Recognizing the best. Accessed February 12, 2016, from http://www.swissstyle.com/social-entrepreneurship/.
- Chowdry, S. (2015). If a leader serves himself, there will be no trust: Klaus Schwab. Accessed February 12, 2016, from http://www.livemint.com/Politics/5TyjFO84HXWNfL02uSO8uM/If-a-leader-serves-himself-there-will-be-no-trust-Klaus-Sc.html.
- Drayton, B. (2013). A team of teams world. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11(2), 57.Google Scholar
- Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics (p. 272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kanani, R. (2011). The Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship on the evolution and future of social enterprise. Accessed June 16, 2016, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rahim-kanani/schwab-foundation-social-entrepreneurship-_b_858312.html.
- Khandker, S. R., & Samad, H. A. (2014). Dynamic effects of microcredit in Bangladesh. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6821), pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
- Le Monde. (2014). Bill Drayton: La création de valeur viendra de la contribution au changement. Accessed February 12, 2016, from http://www.lemonde.fr/emploi/article/2014/06/16/bill-drayton-la-creation-de-valeur-viendra-de-la-contribution-au-changement_4439287_1698637.html.
- Malinsky, E. (2012). Bill Drayton’s five trends for social entrepreneurs. Accessed February 12, 2016, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eli-malinsky/bill-draytons-five-trends_b_2287819.html.
- Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28–39.Google Scholar
- Martin, R. L., & Osberg, S. (2015). Getting beyond better: How social entrepreneurship works. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
- Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
- Nee, E. (2012). Foundations: Jeff Skoll. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(2), 27–29.Google Scholar
- Nicholls, A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: Reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 34(4), 611–633.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
- Schwab Foundation. (2016). Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship. Accessed February 17, 2016. http://www.schwabfound.org/.
- Skoll Foundation. (2016). Skoll. Accessed April 14, 2015. http://skoll.org/.
- Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.Google Scholar
- Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.Google Scholar
- Tarrow, S. (1983a). Resource mobilization and cycles of protest: Theoretical reflections and comparative illustrations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Detroit, August 31–September 4.Google Scholar
- Tarrow, S. (1983b). Struggling to reform: Social movements and policy change during cycles of protest. Western societies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
- Touraine, A. (1988). Return of the actor: Social theory in postindustrial society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum. (2013). Breaking the binary: Policy guide to scaling social innovation. Accessed April 17, 2015, from http://reports.weforum.org/social-innovation-2013/.