Trends and Drivers in CSR Disclosure: A Focus on Reporting Practices in the Automotive Industry
- 959 Downloads
This work focuses on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure practices of multinational corporations. Based on a longitudinal study of CSR reports of companies operating in the automotive industry, the paper offers a detailed study of how disclosure practices are changing and which principles and approaches influence and drive the development of such disclosure. Based on a four-year report-based study, the findings enable us to identify three main trends in the CSR disclosure strategy of automotive firms. First, in line with the mainstream CSR literature, the present study confirms the trend towards the increasing environmental and social accountability. Second, it adds evidence to the emerging debate regarding the harmonization and standardization of reporting and discusses this aspect by mentioning the standards as exerting some normative pressures within the sector. Finally, it provides evidence on specific links emerging between issues and actors. The implications of this evidence contribute to opening up the debate on CSR disclosure to the possibility of combining the institutional lens with a strategic approach that captures the materiality considerations of CSR disclosure.
KeywordsCSR disclosure CSR report Institutional theory Strategic approach Materiality
- Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communications research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Buck, B., Espinach, L., & Söderberg, S. (2014). GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000:2010. How to use the GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction, http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-gri-26000_2014-01-28.pdf.
- Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 948–967.Google Scholar
- Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2005). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between the World Wide Fund for Nature and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), 343–372.Google Scholar
- Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1987). Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. A. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- McKinsey & Company Inc. (2013). The road to 2020 and beyond: What’s driving the global automotive industry? www.mckinsey.com.
- Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 436–452.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
- Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2005). The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: Does source credibility matter? Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 590–591.Google Scholar
- Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (No. 49). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Xueming, L., & Bhattachary, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70, 1–18.Google Scholar