Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 151, Issue 2, pp 517–537 | Cite as

The Detrimental Effect of Cause-Related Marketing Parodies

  • Ouidade SabriEmail author


Cause-related marketing (CrM), defined as a firm’s communication activities designed to promote a consumer good or service by including an offer to contribute a specified amount to a designated nonprofit cause, has become a preponderant practice. In tandem with the development of CrM activities, criticism of CrM has increased; critics note that some CrM claims mislead consumers regarding their purchases’ donative impact. Critics such as consumers and nonprofit advocates are using ad parodies, noncommercial messages that mimic an actual advertisement. In this context, the study investigates how these ad parodies can result in a detrimental impact on consumers’ perceptual and behavioral evaluations of the sponsoring brand. By implementing a tightly controlled experiment comparing actual CrM campaigns and CrM parodies, the author shows that the detrimental effects of CrM parodies on brand attitude and word-of-mouth valence can be explained by greater skepticism toward the firm’s sincere and altruistic motivations. In addition, the author shows that a robust asymmetry emerges in which CrM ad parodies damage perceptual and behavioral evaluations of brands more than actual CrM campaigns improve them. The authors replicate the results for two kinds of critics and two types of brands. The results provide useful implications for theory and practice, documenting the backfire effect of poorly designed CrM, which may urge brands to move toward more self-regulation of CrM practices.


Backfire effect Cause-related marketing Cause-related marketing critics Communication effects Parody 


  1. Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1965). Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression-management. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(4), 394–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baghi, I., Rubaltelli, E., & Tedeschi, M. (2009). A strategy to communicate corporate social responsibility: Cause related marketing and its dark side. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barley, A. (2001). The battle of image. New Statesman, 130(4538), 45.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(June), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of films critics, star power and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker-Olsen, K., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2012). Cause-related marketing influence on consumer responses: The moderating effect of cause–brand fit. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18(4), 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolls, P. D., Muehling, D. D., & Yoon, K. (2003). The effects of television commercial pacing on viewers’ attention and memory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 9(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 330–341.Google Scholar
  13. Buford, M. L., Daniels, G. F., Bolls, P. D., Leshner, G., & Morrison, M. (2012). Cause exhaustion in cause-related marketing: Are causes losing their emotional potency? In American Academy of advertising conference proceedings (online) (pp. 9–21). Lubbock: American Academy of Advertising.Google Scholar
  14. Bush, A. J., Bush, V., & Boller, G. J. (1994). Social criticisms reflected in TV commercial parodies: The influence of popular culture on advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 16(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carducci, V. (2006). Culture jamming: A sociological perspective. Journal of Consumer Culture, 6(1), 116–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  17. Chang, C. T. (2012). Missing ingredients in cause-related advertising: The right formula of execution style and cause framing. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 231–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiou, J. S., & Cheng, C. (2003). Should a company have message boards on its websites? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cone, C. L., Feldman, M. A., & Da Silva, A. T. (2003). Causes and effects. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 95–101.Google Scholar
  20. Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2007). The negative communication dynamic: Exploring the impact of stakeholder affect on behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management, 11(4), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cui, Y., Trent, E. S., Sullivan, P. M., & Matiru, G. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6/7), 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. D’Astous, A., & Bitz, P. (1995). Consumer evaluations of sponsorship programs. European Journal of Marketing, 29(12), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Deshpandé, S., & Hitchon, J. C. (2002). Cause-related marketing ads in the light of negative news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 905–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duncan, T. R., & Moriarty, S. E. (1997). Driving brand value: Using integrated marketing to manage profitable stakeholder relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. File, K. M., & Prince, R. A. (1998). Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1529–1539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., Moldovan, S., & Muller, E. (2007). The NPV of bad news. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing: The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grenoble, R. (2014). ‘SNL’ nails important point about aid programs in Africa with spot-on, hilarious sketch. Retrieved from
  30. Griner, D. (2008). Greenpeace aims ‘onslaught’ back at dove. AdWeek. Retrieved from
  31. Gupta, S., & Pirsch, J. (2006). The company–cause–customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harold, C. (2004). Pranking rhetoric: “Culture jamming” as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 21(3), 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Heath, T. B., DelVecchio, D., & McCarthy, M. S. (2011). The asymmetric effects of extending brands to lower and higher quality. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Horne, J. (2013). Pink profiteers: Cause-related marketing and the exploitation of consumers’ consciences. The George Washington Law Review, 81, 223–258.Google Scholar
  35. Hou, J., Du, L., & Li, J. (2008). Cause’s attributes influencing consumer’s purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 20(4), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang, J. H., & Chen, Y. F. (2006). Herding in online product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hunter, G. L., & Garnefeld, I. (2008). When does consumer empowerment lead to satisfied customers? Some mediating and moderating effects of the empowerment-satisfaction link. Journal of Research for Consumers, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  38. Hyllegard, K. H., Yan, R. N., Ogle, J. P., & Attmann, J. (2011). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on Gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1–2), 100–123.Google Scholar
  39. IEG Sponsorship Report (2014). Sponsorship spending growth slows in North America as marketers eye newer media and marketing options. Accessed January 7, 2014, from
  40. Inoue, Y., & Kent, A. (2014). A conceptual framework for understanding the effects of corporate social marketing on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 621–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing communications and corporate social responsibility (CSR): Marriage of convenience or shotgun wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jean, S. (2011). Brand parody: A communication strategy to attack a competitor. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU press.Google Scholar
  44. Kim, Y. J., & Lee, W. N. (2009). Overcoming consumer skepticism in cause-related marketing: The effects of corporate social responsibility and donation size claim objectivity. Journal of Promotion Management, 15(4), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krishna, A. (2011). Can supporting a cause decrease donations and happiness? The cause marketing paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(3), 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kulkarni, K. (2004). Billionaires for bush: Parody as political intervention. Emisférica Journal of the Hemispheric Institute for Performance and Politics, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
  48. La Ferle, C., Kuber, G., & Edwards, S. M. (2013). Factors impacting responses to cause-related marketing in India and the United States: Novelty, altruistic motives, and company origin. Journal of Business Research, 66(3), 364–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2009). Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ads: Does it really matter? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(2), 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lafferty, B. A., & Edmondson, D. R. (2014). A note on the role of cause type in cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1455–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Landreth, S., & Garretson, J. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CrM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lavack, A. M., & Kropp, F. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of consumer attitudes toward cause related marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 9(2), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kim, M. (2009). Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the brand and website. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(2), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lii, Y. S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing right leads to doing well: When the type of CSR and reputation interact to affect consumer evaluations of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Liu, G. (2013). Impacts of instrumental versus relational centered logic on cause-related marketing decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liu, T. C., Wang, C. Y., & Wu, L. W. (2010). Moderators of the negativity effect: Commitment, identification, and consumer sensitivity to corporate social performance. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. MacKenzie, S., & Lutz, R. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
  60. Nan, X., & Heo, K. (2007). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand–cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nunes, G., & Schultz, D. E. (2011). The high cost of bad publicity: Identify, measure and manage image risk. Marketing Management, 20(4), 32–50.Google Scholar
  62. Nunnally, C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  63. Oh, H., Animesh, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2016). Free versus for-a-fee: The impact of a paywall on the pattern and effectiveness of word-of-mouth via social media. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive–negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1(1), 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pullig, C., Netemeyer, R. G., & Biswas, A. (2006). Attitude basis, certainty, and challenge alignment: A case of negative brand publicity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 528–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reeder, G., & Brewer, M. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reinstein, D. A., & Snyder, C. M. (2005). The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rifon, N., Choi, S., Trimble, C., & Li, H. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robinson, S. R., Irmak, C., & Jayachandran, S. (2012). Choice of cause in cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Roehm, M. L., & Roehm, H. A. (2014). Consumer responses to parodic ads. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(1), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Romani, S. (2006). Price misleading advertising: Effects on trustworthiness toward the source of information and willingness to buy. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 15(2), 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ross, J. K., Patterson, L., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 20(1), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ross, J. K, I. I. I., Stutts, M. A., & Patterson, L. (2011). Tactical considerations for the effective use of cause-related marketing. Journal of Applied Business Research, 7(2), 58–65.Google Scholar
  75. Sabri, O., & Michel, G. (2014). When do advertising parodies hurt?. Journal of Advertising Research 54(2), 233–247.Google Scholar
  76. Shamir, R. (2004). Between self-regulation and the alien tort claims act: On the contested concept of corporate social responsibility. Law & Society Review, 38(4), 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Showronski, J., & Carlston, D. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skard, S., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2014). Is publicity always better than advertising? The role of brand reputation in communicating corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(1), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, S. M., & Alcorn, D. S. (1991). Cause-marketing: A new direction in the marketing of corporate responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8(3), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 434–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Strazzieri, A. (1994). Mesurer l’implication durable vis-à-vis d’un produit indépendamment du risque perçu. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 9(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2004). See how “good” we are: The dangers of using corporate social activities in communication campaigns. In B. E. Kahn & M. F. Luce (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 31, pp. 302–303). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
  83. Tice, C. (2010). Buckets of embarrassment for KFC in cancer promotion. CBS News. Retrieved from
  84. Till, B. D., & Shimp, A. T. (1998). Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tryon, C. (2008). Pop politics: Online parody videos, intertextuality, and political participation. Popular Communication, 6(4), 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tybout, A. M., Calder, B. J., & Sternthal, B. (1981). Using information processing theory to design marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Vanden Bergh, B. G., Lee, M., Quilliam, E. T., & Hove, T. (2011). The multidimensional nature and brand impact of user-generated advertising parodies in social media. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J., & Van Popering, N. (2012). To do well by doing good: Improving corporate image through cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.Google Scholar
  91. Wyatt, R. O., & Badger, D. P. (1984). How reviews affect interest in and evaluation of films. Journalism Quarterly, 61(4), 874–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zhu, D. H., & Chang, Y. P. (2013). Negative publicity effect of the business founder’s unethical behavior on corporate image: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gregor Center of ResearchIAE de Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, Sorbonne Business SchoolParisFrance

Personalised recommendations