The Detrimental Effect of Cause-Related Marketing Parodies
Cause-related marketing (CrM), defined as a firm’s communication activities designed to promote a consumer good or service by including an offer to contribute a specified amount to a designated nonprofit cause, has become a preponderant practice. In tandem with the development of CrM activities, criticism of CrM has increased; critics note that some CrM claims mislead consumers regarding their purchases’ donative impact. Critics such as consumers and nonprofit advocates are using ad parodies, noncommercial messages that mimic an actual advertisement. In this context, the study investigates how these ad parodies can result in a detrimental impact on consumers’ perceptual and behavioral evaluations of the sponsoring brand. By implementing a tightly controlled experiment comparing actual CrM campaigns and CrM parodies, the author shows that the detrimental effects of CrM parodies on brand attitude and word-of-mouth valence can be explained by greater skepticism toward the firm’s sincere and altruistic motivations. In addition, the author shows that a robust asymmetry emerges in which CrM ad parodies damage perceptual and behavioral evaluations of brands more than actual CrM campaigns improve them. The authors replicate the results for two kinds of critics and two types of brands. The results provide useful implications for theory and practice, documenting the backfire effect of poorly designed CrM, which may urge brands to move toward more self-regulation of CrM practices.
KeywordsBackfire effect Cause-related marketing Cause-related marketing critics Communication effects Parody
- Barley, A. (2001). The battle of image. New Statesman, 130(4538), 45.Google Scholar
- Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2003). Message order effects and gender differences in advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 330–341.Google Scholar
- Buford, M. L., Daniels, G. F., Bolls, P. D., Leshner, G., & Morrison, M. (2012). Cause exhaustion in cause-related marketing: Are causes losing their emotional potency? In American Academy of advertising conference proceedings (online) (pp. 9–21). Lubbock: American Academy of Advertising.Google Scholar
- Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Cone, C. L., Feldman, M. A., & Da Silva, A. T. (2003). Causes and effects. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 95–101.Google Scholar
- Duncan, T. R., & Moriarty, S. E. (1997). Driving brand value: Using integrated marketing to manage profitable stakeholder relationships. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Grenoble, R. (2014). ‘SNL’ nails important point about aid programs in Africa with spot-on, hilarious sketch. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/17/saturday-night-live-39-cents-african-aid_n_5999612.html.
- Griner, D. (2008). Greenpeace aims ‘onslaught’ back at dove. AdWeek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/greenpeace-aims-onslaught-back-dove-15967.
- Horne, J. (2013). Pink profiteers: Cause-related marketing and the exploitation of consumers’ consciences. The George Washington Law Review, 81, 223–258.Google Scholar
- Hunter, G. L., & Garnefeld, I. (2008). When does consumer empowerment lead to satisfied customers? Some mediating and moderating effects of the empowerment-satisfaction link. Journal of Research for Consumers, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Hyllegard, K. H., Yan, R. N., Ogle, J. P., & Attmann, J. (2011). The influence of gender, social cause, charitable support, and message appeal on Gen Y’s responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(1–2), 100–123.Google Scholar
- IEG Sponsorship Report (2014). Sponsorship spending growth slows in North America as marketers eye newer media and marketing options. Accessed January 7, 2014, from https://www.sponsorship.com/User/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fiegsr%2f2014%2f01%2f07%2fSponsorship-Spending-Growth-Slows-In-NorthAmerica.aspx&Access=0&Reason=NoUser#.UtBkbmRDscJ.
- Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU press.Google Scholar
- Kulkarni, K. (2004). Billionaires for bush: Parody as political intervention. Emisférica Journal of the Hemispheric Institute for Performance and Politics, 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
- Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods (3rd ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.Google Scholar
- Nunes, G., & Schultz, D. E. (2011). The high cost of bad publicity: Identify, measure and manage image risk. Marketing Management, 20(4), 32–50.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Ross, J. K, I. I. I., Stutts, M. A., & Patterson, L. (2011). Tactical considerations for the effective use of cause-related marketing. Journal of Applied Business Research, 7(2), 58–65.Google Scholar
- Sabri, O., & Michel, G. (2014). When do advertising parodies hurt?. Journal of Advertising Research 54(2), 233–247.Google Scholar
- Swaen, V., & Vanhamme, J. (2004). See how “good” we are: The dangers of using corporate social activities in communication campaigns. In B. E. Kahn & M. F. Luce (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 31, pp. 302–303). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- Tice, C. (2010). Buckets of embarrassment for KFC in cancer promotion. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/buckets-of-embarrassment-for-kfc-in-cancer-promotion/.
- Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.Google Scholar