Corporate Philanthropy, Reputation Risk Management and Shareholder Value: A Study of Australian Corporate giving
- 1.2k Downloads
This study examines the role of corporate philanthropy (CP) in the management of reputation risk and shareholder value of the top 100 ASX listed Australian firms for the 3 years 2011–2013. The results of this study demonstrate the business case for corporate philanthropy and hence encourage corporate philanthropy by showing increasing firms’ investment in corporate giving as a percentage of profit before tax, increases the likelihood of an increase in shareholder value. However, the proviso is that firms must also manage their reputation risk at the same time. There is a negative association between corporate giving and shareholder value (Tobin’s Q) which is mitigated by firms’ management of reputation. The economic significance of this result is that for every cent in the dollar the firm spends on corporate giving, Tobin’s Q will decrease by 0.413 %. In contrast, if the firm increase their reputation by 1 point then Tobin’s Q will increase by 0.267 %. Consequently, the interaction of corporate giving and reputation risk management is positively associated with shareholder value. These results are robust while controlling for potential endogeneity and reverse causality. This paper assists both academics and practitioners by demonstrating that the benefits of corporate philanthropy extend beyond a gesture to improve reputation or an attempt to increase financial performance, to a direct collaboration between all the factors where the benefits far outweigh the costs.
KeywordsCorporate philanthropy Reputation risk management Shareholder value
We would like to thank the London Benchmarking Group in Australia for their encouragement and assistance in this project. We thank the participants at the 2015 European Accounting Association conference Glasgow and Janet Mack for their insightful comments. We would also like to thank QUT for financial assistance and research assistants Alexandra Williamson and Marie Crittall.
- Argenti, P. (2005). The challenge of protecting reputation. Financial Times, Mastering Risk, September 30:2–3.Google Scholar
- Atkins, D., Bates, I., & Drennan, L. (2006). Reputational Risk: A question of trust. London: Lessons Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
- Australian Philanthropy Figures. (2015). Philanthropy Australia. Viewed April 11 2016, www.philanthropy.org.au.
- Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.Google Scholar
- Bloom, M., & Milkovich, G. T. (1998). Relationships among risk, incentive pay, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 283–297.Google Scholar
- Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(1), 49–55.Google Scholar
- Campbell, D., Moore, G., & Metzger, M. (2002). Corporate philanthropy in the U.K. 1985–2000: Some empirical findings. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 363–376.Google Scholar
- Carroll, C. E. (2004). How the mass media influence perceptions of corporate reputation: Exploring agenda-setting effects within business news coverage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
- Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2011) Business and society: ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. https://books.google.com.au/books?isbn=0538453168.
- Centre for Corporate Public Affairs. (2009). Impact of the economic downturn on corporate Community investment. Sydney: Final report to the Department of Social Services.Google Scholar
- Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2003). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Chronicle of Philanthropy. (2012). http://chronicle.com/. Accessed November 10, 2015.
- Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy. (2015). Giving around the globe 2015 edition. Google Scholar
- Downes, J., Schofield, J., & Fentiner Van Vlissengen, R. (2012). What gives? How companies invest in communities. Australia: Catalyst. Retrieved December 27, 2015, from http://www.catalyst.org.au/campaigns/full-disclosure/138-what-gives-how-companies-are-investing-in-communities.
- Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. California: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
- FASB Accounting Standards (No. 117) June, 1993.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C., & Rindova, V. (2000). The Road to Transparency: Reputation Management at Royal Dutch Shell. In M. Schultz, M. J. Hatch, & M. H. Larsen (Eds.), The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation and the Corporate Brand (pp. 77–97). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in the name? Reputation building and corporate strategy, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. In T. L. Beauchamp, N. E. Bowie, & D. G. Arnold (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business (8th ed., p. 55). New Jersey: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Hempel, J. (2003) A corporate cornucopia, Business Week, December.Google Scholar
- Himmelstein, J. L. (1997). Looking good and doing good. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Janis, I. L., & Fadner, R. (1965). The coefficient of imbalance. In H. Lasswell, N. Leites, & Associates (Eds.), Language of Politics (pp. 153–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Knauer, N. J. (1994). The paradox of corporate giving: tax expenditures, the nature of the corporation and the social construction of charity. DePaul Law Review, 44(1), 1–97.Google Scholar
- Lowengard, M. (1989). Community relations: New approaches to building consensus. Public Relations Journal, 45(10), 24.Google Scholar
- Madden, K., & Scaife, W. (2007). Corporate giving: Who gives and why? Wymer (pp. 145–164). London: W. and Sargeant A. The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Marketing.Google Scholar
- McKinsey Quarterly (2008). The state of corporate philanthropy: A McKinsey global survey. Accessed 27, December 2015 http://www.centerforgiving.org/Portals/0/The%20State%20of%20Corporate%20Philanthropy-%20A%20McKinsey%20Global%20Survey%202008.pdf.
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–69.Google Scholar
- Shamma, H. M. (2012). Toward a comprehensive understanding of corporate reputation: concept, measurement and implications. International Journal of Business Management, 7(16), 151–169.Google Scholar
- Smith, C. N. (1994). The new corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 105–116.Google Scholar
- Sum, L. S., & Henry, G. J. (2013). A landscape study of donations in Singapore. World Future Foundation. Accessed 27, December 2015, http://www.worldfuturefound.org/a/Research/Papers/list_65_2.html.
- Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar