Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 245–264 | Cite as

From Resistance to Opportunity-Seeking: Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Nordic Fashion Industry

Article

Abstract

Using survey responses from 400 fashion companies in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Iceland, we examine the diversity of strategic responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility (CSR) within the Nordic fashion industry. We also develop and test a new model of strategic responses to institutional pressures that encompasses both resistance and opportunity-seeking behaviour. Our results suggest that it is inconsistent pressures within, rather than between, stakeholder groups that shape strategic responses to CSR pressures and that increasing pressures stimulates opportunity-seeking at the expense of compliance.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Sustainability Institutional pressures Strategic responses 

References

  1. Accenture. (2010, November 29). A new era of sustainability: UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO Study 2010.Google Scholar
  2. Ählström, J., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2008). The processes of defining corporate responsibility: A study of Swedish garment retailers’ responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(4), 230–244.Google Scholar
  3. Alam, K., Blanch, L., & Smith, A. (2011). Stitched up: Women workers in the Bangladeshi garment sector. London: War on Want.Google Scholar
  4. Alam, K., Klier, S., & McRae, S. (2008). Fashion Victims II: How UK clothing retailers are keeping workers in poverty. London: War on Want.Google Scholar
  5. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.Google Scholar
  6. Allwood, J. M., Laursen, S. E., de Rodriguez, C. M., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2006). Well dressed? Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing.Google Scholar
  7. Amazeen, M. (2011). Gap (RED): Social responsibility campaign or window dressing? Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
  8. Ansett, S. (2007). Mind the gap: A journey to sustainable supply chains. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 19(4), 295–303.Google Scholar
  9. Aragón-Correa, J. A. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556–567.Google Scholar
  10. Arnold, D. G. (2003). Exploitation and the sweatshop quandary. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 243–256.Google Scholar
  11. Baden, D. A., Harwood, I. A., & Woodward, D. G. (2009). The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? European Management Journal, 27(6), 429–441.Google Scholar
  12. Bebbington, J., Higgins, C., & Frame, B. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588–625.Google Scholar
  13. Bekefi, T., & Epstein, M. J. (2008). Transforming social and environmental risks into opportunities. Strategic Finance, 89, 42–47.Google Scholar
  14. Bertels, S., & Peloza, J. (2008). Running just to stand still? Managing CSR reputation in an era of ratcheting expectations. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 56–72.Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya, S. (2010). Exploring the concept of strategic corporate social responsibility for an integrated perspective. European Business Review, 22(1), 82–101.Google Scholar
  16. Birkin, F., Polesie, T., & Lewis, L. (2009). A new business model for sustainable development: An exploratory study using the theory of constraints in Nordic organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 277–290.Google Scholar
  17. Bitzer, V., & Glasbergen, P. (2010). Partnerships for sustainable change in cotton: An Institutional analysis of African cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 223–240.Google Scholar
  18. Blomgren, A. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility influence profit margins? A case study of executive perceptions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(5), 263–274.Google Scholar
  19. Boyd, E., Spekman, R. E., Kamauff, J. W., & Werhane, P. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains: A procedural justice perspective. Long Range Planning, 40(3), 341–356.Google Scholar
  20. Brønn, P. S., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(Suppl 1), 91–109.Google Scholar
  21. Buchholtz, A. K., & Carroll, A. B. (2009). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  22. Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.Google Scholar
  23. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.Google Scholar
  24. Campbell, J. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.Google Scholar
  25. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.Google Scholar
  26. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  27. Castka, P., Balzarova, M. A., Bamber, C. J., & Sharp, J. M. (2004). How can SMEs effectively implement the CSR agenda? A UK case study perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11, 140–149.Google Scholar
  28. Chan, R. Y. K. (2010). Corporate environmentalism pursuit by foreign firms competing in China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 80–92.Google Scholar
  29. Chapman, A. (2010). Mistra future fashion—Review of life cycle assessment. Stockholm: MISTRA—The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research.Google Scholar
  30. Chua, F., & Rahman, A. (2011). Institutional pressures and ethical reckoning by business corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 307–329.Google Scholar
  31. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  32. Clemens, B., Bamford, C., & Douglas, T. (2008). Choosing strategic responses to address emerging environmental regulations: Size, perceived influence and uncertainty. Business Strategy and Environment, 17(8), 493–511.Google Scholar
  33. Clemens, B., & Douglas, T. (2005). Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1205–1213.Google Scholar
  34. Connor, T., & Dent, K. (2006). Offside! Labour rights and sportswear production in Asia. Oxford: Oxfam International.Google Scholar
  35. Turcotte, B., De Bellefeuille, S., & den Hond, F. (2007). Gildan Inc. Journal of Corporate Citizenship Autumn, 2007(27), 23–36.Google Scholar
  36. Co-operative Bank. (2010) Ethical Consumerism Report 2010. Retrieved October 5, 2012, from http://www.goodwithmoney.co.uk/ethicalconsumerismreport.
  37. Cowe, R., & Williams, S. (2000). Who are the ethical consumers?. Manchester: The Co-operative Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Criado-Jiménez, I., Fernández-Chulián, M., Larrinage-González, C., & Husillos-Carqués, F. (2008). Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: The case of Spain (2001–2003). Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 245–262.Google Scholar
  39. Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072–1094.Google Scholar
  40. DEFRA. (2010). Sustainable clothing action plan (Update Feb 2010). London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
  41. Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the Black Box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027–1055.Google Scholar
  42. DeTienne, K. B., & Lewis, L. W. (2005). The pragmatic and ethical barriers to corporate social responsibility disclosure: The Nike case. Journal of Business Ethics, 60(4), 359–376.Google Scholar
  43. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.Google Scholar
  44. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47–73.Google Scholar
  45. Doorey, D. J. (2011). The transparent supply chain: From resistance to implementation at Nike and Levi-Strauss. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 587–603.Google Scholar
  46. Emmelhainz, M. A., & Adams, R. J. (1999). The apparel industry response to “sweatshop” concerns: A review and analysis of codes of conduct. The Journal of Supply Chain Management Summer, 1999, 51–57.Google Scholar
  47. Etherington, L. D., & Richardson, A. J. (1994). Institutional Pressures on University Accounting Education in Canada. Contemporary Accounting Research Special Education Research, 10, 141–162.Google Scholar
  48. Fisher, T., Cooper, T., Woodward, S., Hiller, A., & Goworek, H. (2008). Public understanding of sustainable clothing: A report to the department for environment, food and rural affairs. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), London.Google Scholar
  49. Fitjar, R. D. (2011). Little big firms? Corporate social responsibility in small businesses that do not compete against big ones. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(1), 30–44.Google Scholar
  50. Fletcher, K. (2008). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  51. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, Massachusetts: Pitman.Google Scholar
  52. Frenkel, S. J., & Scott, D. (2002). Compliance collaboration, and codes of labor practice: The Adidas Connection. California Management Review, 45(1), 29–49.Google Scholar
  53. Garcés-Ayerbe, C., Rivera-Torres, P., & Murillo-Luna, J. (2012). Stakeholder pressure and environmental proactivity: Moderating effect of competitive advantage expectations. Management Decision, 50(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
  54. Giesen, B. (2008). Ethical clothing—New awareness or fading fashion trend. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Gjølberg, M. (2009a). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.Google Scholar
  56. Gjølberg, M. (2009b). The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies? Socio-Economic Review, 7(4), 605–637.Google Scholar
  57. Gjølberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”. Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 203–229.Google Scholar
  58. Goodrick, E., & Salancik, G. R. (1996). Organizational discretion in responding to institutional practices: Hospitals and Cesarean births. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  59. Goodstein, G. D. (1994). Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: Employer involvement in work–family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), 350–382.Google Scholar
  60. Goworek, H. (2011). Social and environmental sustainability in the clothing industry: A case study of a fair trade retailer. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(1), 74–86.Google Scholar
  61. Graafland, J. J. (2002). Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: The case of C&A. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11(3), 282–294.Google Scholar
  62. Graafland, J., & van de Ven, B. (2006). Strategic and moral motivation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 22(Summer), 111–123.Google Scholar
  63. Grayson, D., & Hodges, A. (2004). Corporate social opportunity! Seven steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  64. Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–498.Google Scholar
  65. Greenpeace, (2009). Slaugthering the Amazon. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  66. Greenpeace. (2011a). Dirty laundry. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  67. Greenpeace. (2011b). Dirty laundry 2: Hung out to dry. Amsterdam: Greenpeace.Google Scholar
  68. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054.Google Scholar
  69. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.Google Scholar
  70. Haanaes, K., Balagopal, B., Arthur, D., Kong, M. T., Velken, I., Kruschwitz, N., et al. (2011). First look: The second annual sustainability & innovation survey. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 77–83.Google Scholar
  71. Heikkurinen, P. (2010). Image differentiation with corporate environmental responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(3), 142–152.Google Scholar
  72. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 87–99.Google Scholar
  73. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85.Google Scholar
  74. Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses: The diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133–156.Google Scholar
  75. Hoivik, H. W., & Melé, D. (2009). Can an SME become a global corporate citizen? Evidence from a case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 551–563.Google Scholar
  76. Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 838–849.Google Scholar
  77. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2010). Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance information: A Study of two global clothing and sports retail companies. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 131–148.Google Scholar
  78. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371–394.Google Scholar
  79. Jackson, N., & Carter, P. (2000). Rethinking organisational behaviour. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  80. Jermier, J. M., & Forbes, L. C. (2003). Greening organizations: Critical issues. In M. Alvesson & H. Willmott (Eds.), Studying management critically (pp. 157–176). London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  81. Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 163–179.Google Scholar
  82. Jones, B., Temperley, J., & Lima, A. (2009). Corporate reputation in the Era of Web 2.0. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(9–10), 927–939.Google Scholar
  83. Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297–311.Google Scholar
  84. Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. (2006). Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 145–159.Google Scholar
  85. Knight, G., & Greenberg, J. (2002). Promotionalism and subpolitics: Nike and its labor critics. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 541–570.Google Scholar
  86. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.Google Scholar
  87. Kozlowski, A., Bardecki, M., & Searcy, C. (2012). Environmental impacts in the fashion industry: A life-cycle and stakeholder framework. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 45, 17–36.Google Scholar
  88. KPMG. (2011). KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2011. http://www.kpmg.com/Ca/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/CSR%20Survey%202011.pdf.
  89. Langhelle, O., Blindheim, B.-T., Laudal, T., Blomgren, A., & Fitjar, R. D. (2009). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility. Case: The clothing business. Stavanger: International Research Institute of Stavanger (IRIS). http://www.iris.no/internet/student.nsf/199f312efd2a0cacc125680e00635b85/535ba92284863db9c125768f004e4511/$FILE/IRIS%202009-247.pdf.
  90. Laudal, T. (2010). An attempt to determine the CSR potential of the international clothing business. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 63–77.Google Scholar
  91. Lawrence, A. T. (2010). Managing disputes with nonmarket stakeholders: Wage a fight, withdraw, wait, or work it out? California Management Review, 53(1), 90–113.Google Scholar
  92. Lee, M.-D. P. (2011). Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 281–298.Google Scholar
  93. Lee, S.-Y., & Rhee, S.-K. (2005). From end-of-pipe technology towards pollution preventive approach: The evolution of corporate environmentalism in Korea. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 387–395.Google Scholar
  94. Lee, S. Y., & Rhee, S.-K. (2007). The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision, 45, 196–216.Google Scholar
  95. Li, S., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Latteman, C., & Yeh, K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: The importance of the governance environment. Management International Review, 50(5), 635–654.Google Scholar
  96. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59–87.Google Scholar
  97. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2010). The role of institutional pressures on organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt Internet-enabled supply chain management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 28, 372–384.Google Scholar
  98. Livesey, S. M. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. Journal of Business Communication, 38(1), 58–91.Google Scholar
  99. Locke, R., & Romis, M. (2007). Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 54–62.Google Scholar
  100. Lozano, J. M., Albareda, L., Ysa, T., Roscher, H., & Marcuccio, M. (2008). Governments and corporate social responsibility: Public policies beyond regulation and voluntary compliance. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  101. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.Google Scholar
  102. McAdam, T. W. (1973). How to put corporate responsibility into practice. Business & Society Review/Innovation Summer, 73(6), 8–20.Google Scholar
  103. McKinsey (2001). McKinsey global survey results: How companies manage sustainability. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/PDFDownload.aspx?ar=2558. Accessed Jan 23
  104. McMullen, A., & Maher, S. (2009). Let’s clean up fashion. Bristol: Labour Behind the Label.Google Scholar
  105. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  106. Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2010). The interactive effect of internal and external factors on a proactive environmental strategy and its influence on a firm’s performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 279–298.Google Scholar
  107. Midttun, A., Gautesen, K., & Gølberg, M. (2006). The political economy of CSR in Western Europe. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 369–385.Google Scholar
  108. Mirvis, P., & Googins, B. K. (2006). Stages of corporate citizenship: A developmental framework. Chestnut Hill: The Center for Corporate Citizenship at Boston College.Google Scholar
  109. Misani, N. (2010). The convergence of corporate social responsibility practices. Management Research Review, 33(7), 734–748.Google Scholar
  110. MISTRA. (2010). Mistra future fashion research program: Background paper. Stockholm: The Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA).Google Scholar
  111. Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2008). Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders’ pressure approach. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1225–1240.Google Scholar
  112. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.Google Scholar
  113. Noci, G., & Verganti, R. (1999). Managing ‘green’ product innovation in small firms. R&D Management, 29(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
  114. Nordic Fashion Association. (2009). This is NICE: NICE 10-year plan of action. Copenhagen: Nordic Fashion Association.Google Scholar
  115. O’Higgins, E. R. E. (2010). Corporations, civil society, and stakeholders: An organizational conceptualization. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 157–176.Google Scholar
  116. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.Google Scholar
  117. Owen, D. L., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.Google Scholar
  118. Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.Google Scholar
  119. Park, H., & Lennon, S. J. (2006). The organizational factors influencing socially responsible apparel buying/sourcing. Clothing & Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), 229–247.Google Scholar
  120. Park, H., & Stoel, L. (2005). A model of socially responsible buying/sourcing decision-making processes. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(4), 235–248.Google Scholar
  121. Pedersen, E. R. (2010). Modelling CSR: How managers understand the responsibilities of business towards society. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 155–166.Google Scholar
  122. Pedersen, E. R. G. (2011). All animals are equal, but …: Management perceptions of stakeholder relationships and societal responsibilities in multinational corporations. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(2), 177–191.Google Scholar
  123. Perez-Aleman, P., & Sandilands, M. (2008). Building value at the top and the bottom of the global value chain. California Management Review, 51(1), 24–49.Google Scholar
  124. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  125. Preuss, L. (2011). Innovative CSR: A framework for anchoring corporate social responsibility in the innovation literature. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 42(Summer), 17–33.Google Scholar
  126. Quazi, A. M. (2003). Identifying the determinants of corporate managers’ perceived social obligations. Management Decision, 41(9), 822–831.Google Scholar
  127. Räsänen, K., Meriläinen, S., & lovio, R. (1994). Pioneering descriptions of corporate greening: Notes and doubts on the emerging discussion. Business Strategy and the Environment, 3(4), 9–16.Google Scholar
  128. Riddselius, C., & Maher, S. (2010). Killer Jeans. Fair Trade Center/Labour Behind the Label.Google Scholar
  129. Schaefer, A. (2007). Contrasting institutional and performance accounts of environmental management systems: Three case studies in the UK Water & Severage Industry. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 506–535.Google Scholar
  130. Scott, W. R. (2010). Reflections: The past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  131. Sethi, S. P. (2003). Setting global standards: Guidelines for creating codes of conduct in multinational corporations. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  132. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.Google Scholar
  133. SHRM. (2007). 2007 Corporate social responsibility: United States, Australia, India, China, Canada, Mexico and Brazil. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Research Department.Google Scholar
  134. Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45(4), 52–76.Google Scholar
  135. Spar, D. L., & La Mure, L. T. (2003). The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review, 45(3), 78–101.Google Scholar
  136. Spence, L., & Bourlakis, M. (2009). The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: The case of Waitrose. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(4), 291–302.Google Scholar
  137. Spence, L. J., Coles, A.-M., & Harris, L. (2001). The forgotten stakeholder? Ethics and social responsibility in relation to competitors. Business and Society Review, 106(4), 331–352.Google Scholar
  138. Steurer, R. (2010). The role of governments in corporate social responsibility: Characterising public policies on CSR in Europe. Policy Sciences, 43(1), 49–72.Google Scholar
  139. Swartz, J. (2010). Timberland’s CEO on standing up to 65,000 angry activists. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 39–127.Google Scholar
  140. Tan, J., & Wang, L. (2011). MNC strategic responses to ethical pressure: An institutional logic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 373–390.Google Scholar
  141. Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.Google Scholar
  142. van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 95–105.Google Scholar
  143. van Tulder, R., van Wijk, J., & Kolk, A. (2009). From chain liability to chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl 2), 399–412.Google Scholar
  144. Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 87–108.Google Scholar
  145. Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–552.Google Scholar
  146. Wheeler, D., Colbert, B., & Freeman, R. E. (2003). Focusing on value: Reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of General Management, 28(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
  147. Wright, C. M., Smith, M. E., & Wright, B. G. (2007). Hidden costs associated with stakeholders in supply management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 64–82.Google Scholar
  148. Yu, X. (2008). Impacts of corporate code of conduct on labour standards: A case study of Reebok’s athletic footwear supplier factory in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 513–529.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen
    • 1
  • Wencke Gwozdz
    • 1
  1. 1.Copenhagen Business School, Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (cbsCSR)FrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations