PIK3CA mutations early persistence in cell-free tumor DNA as a negative prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with hormonal therapy
- 5 Downloads
The identification of biomarkers of hormonal therapy (HT) failure would allow tailored monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. PIK3CA gene mutation is one of the most frequent events in mBC and is associated with HT resistance. We evaluated the early prognostic value of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) PIK3CA detection in first-line HT-treated mBC patients.
Between June 2012 and January 2014, 39 patients were prospectively included in a dedicated clinical trial (NCT01612871). Blood sampling was performed before (M0) and 4 weeks (M1), 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6) after HT initiation, and at tumor progression. Patients were followed until progression or until the end of the study (2 years). Mutation detection was performed using droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR). Progression-free survival (PFS) was used as primary endpoint.
Median age at inclusion was 63 years (range 40–86). Most patients (34/39) received an aromatase inhibitor and presented a non-measurable disease (71.8%). PIK3CA mutations were reported in 10 (27.8%) and 5 (14.3%) cases at M0 and M1, respectively. The persistence of a detectable circulating mutation at M1 was highly correlated with a worse progression-free survival (PFS), rate at 1 year: 40% versus 76.7%; p = 0.0053).
Four-week persistence of cfDNA PIK3CA mutation appears highly correlated with PFS.
NCT01612871, registered on June 6th, 2012; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01612871.
KeywordsBreast cancer PIK3CA Cell-free DNA Prognostic biomarker
Metastatic breast cancer
Mammalian target of rapamycin
PI3K catalytic subunit alpha
- 95% CI
95% confidence interval
The authors want to thank Dr. Hélène de Forges for her substantive writing and editing assistance.
Study concept/design/funding: WJ, P-JL, EL-C, FD, and AD. Reagents/materials/analysis tools contribution: NG, P-JL, NL, and EL-C. Patients’ inclusion and follow-up: WJ, FD, AD, J-LL, SP, LG, GR, and HR. Acquisition of data: NG, WJ, P-JL, and EL-C. Statistical analysis: LC and TF. Analysis and interpretation of data: WJ, P-JL, and EL-C. Drafting of the manuscript: NG, WJ, P-JL, EL-C, FD, LC, and TF. All the authors participated to the critical revision and validation of the final manuscript.
This ancillary study was supported by the “Fond pour la Recherche Val d’Aurelle” grant. This research was supported by the SIRIC Montpellier Cancer Grant INCa_Inserm_DGOS_12553.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This study was approved by the CPP (Ethics Committee) Sud-Ouest et Outre-Mer III and registered under the reference No. 2012/25. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
- 4.Ramirez-Ardila DE, Helmijr JC, Look MP, Lurkin I, Ruigrok-Ritstier K, van Laere S, Dirix L, Sweep FC, Span PN, Linn SC, Foekens JA, Sleijfer S, Berns EM, Jansen MP (2013) Hotspot mutations in PIK3CA associate with first-line treatment outcome for aromatase inhibitors but not for tamoxifen. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139(1):39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2529-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Higgins MJ, Jelovac D, Barnathan E, Blair B, Slater S, Powers P, Zorzi J, Jeter SC, Oliver GR, Fetting J, Emens L, Riley C, Stearns V, Diehl F, Angenendt P, Huang P, Cope L, Argani P, Murphy KM, Bachman KE, Greshock J, Wolff AC, Park BH (2012) Detection of tumor PIK3CA status in metastatic breast cancer using peripheral blood. Clin Cancer Res 18(12):3462–3469. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bertucci F, Ng CKY, Patsouris A, Droin N, Piscuoglio S, Carbuccia N, Soria JC, Dien AT, Adnani Y, Kamal M, Garnier S, Meurice G, Jimenez M, Dogan S, Verret B, Chaffanet M, Bachelot T, Campone M, Lefeuvre C, Bonnefoi H, Dalenc F, Jacquet A, De Filippo MR, Babbar N, Birnbaum D, Filleron T, Le Tourneau C, Andre F (2019) Genomic characterization of metastatic breast cancers. Nature 569(7757):560–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1056-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Singh VM, Salunga RC, Huang VJ, Tran Y, Erlander M, Plumlee P, Peterson MR (2013) Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies. Ann Diagn Pathol 17(4):322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2013.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Goto K, Ichinose Y, Ohe Y, Yamamoto N, Negoro S, Nishio K, Itoh Y, Jiang H, Duffield E, McCormack R, Saijo N, Mok T, Fukuoka M (2012) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in circulating free DNA in serum: from IPASS, a phase III study of gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 7(1):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307f98 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Board RE, Wardley AM, Dixon JM, Armstrong AC, Howell S, Renshaw L, Donald E, Greystoke A, Ranson M, Hughes A, Dive C (2010) Detection of PIK3CA mutations in circulating free DNA in patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120(2):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0747-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Baselga J, Im SA, Iwata H, Cortes J, De Laurentiis M, Jiang Z, Arteaga CL, Jonat W, Clemons M, Ito Y, Awada A, Chia S, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Pistilli B, Tseng LM, Hurvitz S, Masuda N, Takahashi M, Vuylsteke P, Hachemi S, Dharan B, Di Tomaso E, Urban P, Massacesi C, Campone M (2017) Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(7):904–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30376-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Lamy PJ, Castan F, Lozano N, Montelion C, Audran P, Bibeau F, Roques S, Montels F, Laberenne AC (2015) Next-generation genotyping by digital PCR to detect and quantify the BRAF V600E Mutation in melanoma biopsies. J Mol Diagn 17(4):366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hu ZY, Xie N, Tian C, Yang X, Liu L, Li J, Xiao H, Wu H, Lu J, Gao J, Hu X, Cao M, Shui Z, Xiao M, Tang Y, He Q, Chang L, Xia X, Yi X, Liao Q, Ouyang Q (2018) Identifying circulating tumor DNA mutation profiles in metastatic breast cancer patients with multiline resistance. EBioMedicine 32:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Rothe F, Laes JF, Lambrechts D, Smeets D, Vincent D, Maetens M, Fumagalli D, Michiels S, Drisis S, Moerman C, Detiffe JP, Larsimont D, Awada A, Piccart M, Sotiriou C, Ignatiadis M (2014) Plasma circulating tumor DNA as an alternative to metastatic biopsies for mutational analysis in breast cancer. Ann Oncol 25(10):1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Petrakova K, Blackwell KL, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Mondal S, Su F, Miller M, Elmeliegy M, Germa C, O’Shaughnessy J (2018) Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 29(7):1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy155 Google Scholar
- 23.Andre F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, Iwata H, Conte P, Mayer IA, Kaufman B, Yamashita T, Lu YS, Inoue K, Takahashi M, Papai Z, Longin AS, Mills D, Wilke C, Hirawat S, Juric D, Group S-S, the S-SG (2019) Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380(20):1929–1940. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813904 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.O’Leary B, Hrebien S, Morden JP, Beaney M, Fribbens C, Huang X, Liu Y, Bartlett CH, Koehler M, Cristofanilli M, Garcia-Murillas I, Bliss JM, Turner NC (2018) Early circulating tumor DNA dynamics and clonal selection with palbociclib and fulvestrant for breast cancer. Nat Commun 9(1):896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03215-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Vora SR, Juric D, Kim N, Mino-Kenudson M, Huynh T, Costa C, Lockerman EL, Pollack SF, Liu M, Li X, Lehar J, Wiesmann M, Wartmann M, Chen Y, Cao ZA, Pinzon-Ortiz M, Kim S, Schlegel R, Huang A, Engelman JA (2014) CDK 4/6 inhibitors sensitize PIK3CA mutant breast cancer to PI3 K inhibitors. Cancer Cell 26(1):136–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Herrera-Abreu MT, Palafox M, Asghar U, Rivas MA, Cutts RJ, Garcia-Murillas I, Pearson A, Guzman M, Rodriguez O, Grueso J, Bellet M, Cortes J, Elliott R, Pancholi S, Baselga J, Dowsett M, Martin LA, Turner NC, Serra V (2016) Early adaptation and acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res 76(8):2301–2313. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar