Metabolic syndrome and risk of breast cancer mortality by menopause, obesity, and subtype
- 370 Downloads
To investigate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and risk of breast cancer mortality by menopausal status, obesity, and subtype.
Data from 94,555 women free of cancer at baseline in the National Institute of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study cohort (NIH-AARP) were used to investigate the prospective associations of baseline MetS and components with risk of breast cancer mortality using Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for baseline behavioral and demographic covariates.
During a mean follow-up duration of 14 years, 607 women in the cohort died of breast cancer. Overall, MetS was associated with a 73% increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.09–2.75); the association remained significant among post-menopausal women overall (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.32, 3.25), and among those with overweight/obesity (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.81, 1.64). MetS was associated with increased risk of breast cancer mortality for ER+/PR+ (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.52, 3.16) and lower risk for ER−/PR− (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.11, 1.75) subtypes; however, the associations were not statistically significant. Of the individual MetS components, high waist circumference (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03, 1.70), high cholesterol (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05, 1.46), and hypertension (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.05, 1.46) were independently associated with increased risk of breast cancer mortality.
MetS was associated with increased risk of breast cancer mortality, especially among post-menopausal women. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to definitively determine the extent to which these associations vary by breast cancer subtype.
KeywordsMetabolic syndrome Breast cancer mortality Menopause Obesity Hormone-receptor subtypes
We thank the participants in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study for their cooperation, and David Campbell and Jane Wang at Information management Services (Silver Spring, MD) for data support.
TA conceived and designed the study and oversaw statistical analysis and manuscript writing. DTD, KO, TA, and DB contributed to statistical analysis, drafting of the results, and critical review of the manuscript. All authors substantially contributed to the manuscript.
TA was funded by Grant K01TW010271 by the NIH. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The Special Studies Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the U.S. National Cancer Institute approved the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (Protocol Number: OH95CN025).
- 14.Healy LA, Ryan AM, Carroll P, Ennis D, Crowley V, Boyle T, Kennedy MJ, Connolly E, Reynolds JV (2010) Metabolic syndrome, central obesity and insulin resistance are associated with adverse pathological features in postmenopausal breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 22(4):281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Simon MS, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Hastert TA, Manson JE, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Neuhouser ML, Ho GYF, Freudenheim JL, Strickler H, Ruterbusch J et al (2018) Cardiometabolic risk factors and survival after breast cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative. Cancer 124(8):1798–1807PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Gathirua-Mwangi WG, Song Y, Monahan PO, Champion VL, Zollinger TW (2018) Associations of metabolic syndrome and C-reactive protein with mortality from total cancer, obesity-linked cancers and breast cancer among women in NHANES III. Int J Cancer 143(3):535–542PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Chan DS, Vieira AR, Aune D, Bandera EV, Greenwood DC, McTiernan A, Navarro Rosenblatt D, Thune I, Vieira R, Norat T (2014) Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol 25(10):1901–1914PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Harlan LC, Tangrea J, Hollenbeck AR, Hurwitz PE, Coyle L, Schussler N, Michaud DS et al (2001) Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions: the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 154(12):1119–1125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Etemadi A, Sinha R, Ward MH, Graubard BI, Inoue-Choi M, Dawsey SM, Abnet CC (2017) Mortality from different causes associated with meat, heme iron, nitrates, and nitrites in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: population based cohort study. BMJ 357.j1957Google Scholar
- 26.Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC Jr et al (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120(16):1640–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kang S, Song J, Kang H, Kim S, Lee Y, Park D (2003) Insulin can block apoptosis by decreasing oxidative stress via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase-dependent signaling pathways in HepG2 cells. Eur J Endocrinol 148(1):147–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Monteiro R, Azevedo I (2010) Chronic inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Mediat Inflamm 289645Google Scholar
- 45.Villaseñor A, Flatt SW, Marinac C, Natarajan L, Pierce JP, Patterson RE (2013) Postdiagnosis C-reactive protein and breast cancer survivorship: findings from the WHEL study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark PrevGoogle Scholar