Improving the competency of medical students in clinical breast examination through a standardized simulation and multimedia-based curriculum
Clinical breast examination (CBE) is an important step in the assessment of patients with breast-related complaints. We developed a standardized simulation and multimedia-based (SSMBI) curriculum using current evidenced-based recommendations. This study aimed to determine if SSMBI training resulted in better performance (examination scores and detection of abnormal findings) than the traditional teaching method.
Novice fourth-year medical students were exposed to the SSMBI curriculum (n = 68) or traditional (n = 52) training. The traditional group was taught by a lecture and attending weekly clinics where they had hands-on experience. The SSMBI group underwent a structured lecture followed by an instructional video and dedicated simulated teaching. Both groups were assessed through a written knowledge exam and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Student’s t test and χ2 tests were used to assess differences in CBE technique and knoweldge.
Students who underwent SSMBI training had significantly higher numbers of correct answers describing the different steps and justifications of CBE. OSCE performance was significantly higher in the SSMBI group. SSMBI-trained students were more likely to complete all the necessary CBE steps compared to traditionally-trained students (88.2% vs. 28.2%, p < 0.00001). The SSMBI group was also more systematic and more likely to perform adequate inspection, palpation, examination of the nipple-areolar complex, and identify and characterize a palpable lesion (p < 0.05).
Formal SSMBI training is an important asset when teaching medical students how to perform a CBE. Real clinical experience is still necessary to refine this skill and the physician–patient interaction.
KeywordsClinical breast examination Breast disease Breast cancer Breast
Clinical breast examination
Objective structured clinical examinations
Standardized simulation and multimedia-based
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval was obtained by the review board from the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana School of Medicine in Bogota, Colombia.
- 1.Klein S (2005) Evaluation of palpable breast masses. Breast 100:28–33Google Scholar
- 7.Khatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, Esserman LJ, Grunfeld E, Halberg F, Hantel A, Henry NL, Muss HB, Smith TJ (2012) Breast cancer follow-up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9859 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Smith RL, Hanchak NA, Leibreid D (1996) The effectiveness of postgraduate education on the clinical breast examination skills of primary care physicians. Am J Man Care 2:989–995Google Scholar
- 18.Cook TD, Campbell DT, Shadish W (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 19.Angarita FA, Acuna SA, Torregrosa L, Tawil M (2008) Examen clínico de mama (instruction video). Asociación Colombiana de Cirugía. https://www.ascolcirugia.org/component/k2/item/36-examen-clinico-de-la-mama.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2017
- 26.Lee M, Vermillion M (2018) Comparative values of medical school assessments in the prediction of internship performance. Med Teach 1:1–6Google Scholar
- 30.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2016) Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Version 1Google Scholar
- 31.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2017) Breast cancer risk assessment and screening in average-risk women. ACOG Pract Bull 170:1–16Google Scholar
- 33.Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, Herzig A, Michaelson JS, Shih YC, Walter LC, Church TR, Flowers CR, LaMonte SJ, Wolf AM, DeSantis C, Lortet-Tieulent J, Andrews K, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, Smith RA, Brawley OW, Wender R, American Cancer Society (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 314(15):1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Chang JM (2011) The detection of recurrent breast cancer in patients with a history of breast cancer surgery: comparison of clinical breast examination, mammography and ultrasonography. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 52(1):15–20Google Scholar