Advertisement

Brain Topography

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 111–117 | Cite as

Grey Matter Volumes in the Executive Attention System Predict Individual Differences in Effortful Control in Young Adults

  • Luqing Wei
  • Nana Guo
  • Chris Baeken
  • Minghua Bi
  • Xiaowan Wang
  • Jiang Qiu
  • Guo-Rong WuEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Effortful control (EC), considered as one component of temperament, describes an individual’s capacity for self-regulation. Previous neuroimaging studies have provided convergent evidence that individual differences in EC are determined by the functioning of neural systems subserving executive attention, primarily comprising the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC). Notwithstanding, as previous neuroimaging findings highlighted the structural neural bases of EC in adolescence, during which the PFC is prominently remodeled, the underlying neuroanatomical substrates of EC remain uncertain in young adults. In this study, we included 246 healthy young adults and used voxel-based morphometry analysis to investigate the relationship between EC and grey matter (GM) volumes. Additionally, permutation testing and cross-validation were applied to determine whether GM volumes in the detected regions could predict individual differences in EC. Our results revealed that EC was associated with GM volumes in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), demonstrating that these two regions may play a crucial role in EC. Furthermore, the identified regional GM volumes reliably contribute to the prediction of EC confirmed by cross-validation. Overall, these findings provide further evidence for the involvement of the executive attention system in EC, and shed more light on the neuroanatomical substrates of EC in young adulthood.

Keywords

Effortful control Voxel-based morphometry Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex Pre-supplementary motor area 

Notes

Acknowledgements

G-R.W was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61876156, 61403312), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. SWU116074). This research was supported by a grant of het Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Rode Neuzen (G0F4617N).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Allman JM, Hakeem A, Erwin JM, Nimchinsky E, Hof P (2001) The anterior cingulate cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci 935:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braver TS, Barch DM, Gray JR, Molfese DL, Snyder A (2001) Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency inhibition and errors. Cereb Cortex 11:825–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, Jenike MA, McInerney SC, Rauch SL (1998) The counting stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 6(4):270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bush G et al (1999) Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the counting stroop. Biol Psychiatry 45:1542–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bush G, Vogt BA, Holmes J, Dale AM, Greve D, Jenike MA, Rosen BR (2002) Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: a role in reward-based decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:523–528.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012470999 Google Scholar
  7. Bush G, Valera EM, Seidman LJ (2005) Functional neuroimaging of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a review and suggested future directions. Biol Psychiatry 57:1273–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280:747–749.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casey B et al (1997) The role of the anterior cingulate in automatic and controlled processes: a developmental neuroanatomical study. Dev Psychobiol 30:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casey B, Tottenham N, Liston C, Durston S (2005) Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? Trends Cogn Sci 9:104–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chao HH, Luo X, Chang JL, Li C-sR (2009) Activation of the pre-supplementary motor area but not inferior prefrontal cortex in association with short stop signal reaction time—an intra-subject analysis. BMC Neurosci 10:75.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clements AD, Bailey BA (2010) The relationship between temperament and anxiety phase I in the development of a risk screening model to predict stress-related health problems. J Health Psychol 15:515–525.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105309355340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui Z, Su M, Li L, Shu H, Gong G (2017) Individualized prediction of reading comprehension ability using gray matter volume. Cereb Cortex 28(5):1–17Google Scholar
  14. Davis EP, Bruce J, Gunnar MR (2002) The anterior attention network: associations with temperament and neuroendocrine activity in 6-year-old children. Dev Psychobiol 40:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drevets WC, Raichle ME (1998) Reciprocal suppression of regional cerebral blood flow during emotional versus higher cognitive processes: implications for interactions between emotion and cognition. Cogn Emot 12:353–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duann J-R, Ide JS, Luo X, Li C-sR (2009) Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J Neurosci 29:10171–10179.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1300-09.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL (2004) Emotion-related regulation: sharpening the definition. Child Dev 75:334–339  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00674.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Baba M (2017) Lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC). In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford T, (eds). Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans DE, Rothbart MK (2007) Developing a model for adult temperament. J Res Pers 41:868–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forstmann BU, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008) Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1854–1865.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaal SV, Scholte HS, Lamme VAF, Fahrenfort JJ, Ridderinkhof KR (2011) Pre-SMA gray-matter density predicts individual differences in action selection in the face of conscious and unconscious response conflict. J Cogn Neurosci 23:382–390.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giedd JN (2004) Structural magnetic resonance imaging of the adolescent brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1021:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jernigan TL, Trauner DA, Hesselink JR, Tallal PA (1991) Maturation of human cerebrum observed in vivo during adolescence. Brain 114:2037–2049.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.5.2037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kam JWY, Solbakk AK, Endestad T, Meling TR, Knight RT (2018) Lateral prefrontal cortex lesion impairs regulation of internally and externally directed attention. NeuroImage 175:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanske P, Kotz SA (2013) Effortful control, depression, and anxiety correlate with the influence of emotion on executive attentional control. Biol Psychol 91:88–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keehn B, Muller RA, Townsend J (2013) Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:164–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly AM, Hester R, Murphy K, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, Garavan H (2004) Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI. Eur J Neurosci 19:3105–3112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03429.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly AM, Hester R, Murphy K, Javitt DC, Foxe JJ, Garavan H (2015) Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI. Eur J Neurosci 19:3105–3112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kennis M, Rademaker AR, Geuze E (2013) Neural correlates of personality: an integrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:73–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King RB, Gaerlan MJM (2014) High self-control predicts more positive emotions, better engagement, and higher achievement in school. Eur J Psychol Educ 29:81–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0188-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin W-L, Hsu K-Y, Chen H-C, Chang W-y (2013) Different attentional traits different creativities. Think Skills Creat 9:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu W et al (2017) Longitudinal test-retest neuroimaging data from healthy young adults in southwest China. Sci Data 4:170017.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsden CD et al (1996) The functions of the supplementary motor area. Summary of a workshop. Adv Neurol 70:477Google Scholar
  34. Mayberg HS (1997) Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 9:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meehan KB, De Panfilis C, Cain NM, Clarkin JF (2013) Effortful control and externalizing problems in young adults. Pers Individ Differ 55:553–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moriya J, Tanno Y (2008) Relationships between negative emotionality and attentional control in effortful control. Pers Individ Differ 44:1348–1355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mostofsky SH, Simmonds DJ (2008) Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J Cogn Neurosci 20:751–761.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Muller A, Claes L, Mitchell JE, Fischer J, Horbach T, de Zwaan M (2012) Binge eating and temperament in morbidly obese prebariatric surgery patients. Eur Eat Disord Rev 20:e91–e95.  https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.1126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nachev P, Wydell H, O’Neill K, Husain M, Kennard C (2007) The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action. NeuroImage 36:T155-T163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M (2008) Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:856–869.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pardo JV, Pardo PJ, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:256–259.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.1.256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pedregosa F et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830Google Scholar
  43. Picard RR, Cook RD (1984) Cross-validation of regression models. J Am Stat Assoc 79:575–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Picard N, Strick PL (1996) Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex 6:342–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Posner MI (2012) Imaging attention networks. Neuroimage 61:450–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Posner MI, Rothbart MK (2009) Toward a physical basis of attention and self-regulation. Phys Life Rev 6:103–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2009.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ray Li CS, Huang C, Constable RT, Sinha R (2006) Imaging response inhibition in a stop-signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post-response processing. J Neurosci 26:186–192.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3741-05.2006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rothbart MK, Rosario Rueda M (2005) The development of effortful control. In: Mayr U, Awh E, Keele S (eds) Developing individuality in the human brain: a tribute to Michael I Posner. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp 167–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rothbart MK, Sheese BE, Posner MI (2007) Executive attention and effortful control: linking temperament, brain networks and genes. Child Dev Perspect 1:2–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00002.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sakai H, Takahara M, Honjo NF, Doi SI, Sadato N, Uchiyama Y (2012) Regional frontal gray matter volume associated with executive function capacity as a risk factor for vehicle crashes in normal aging adults. PLoS ONE 7:e45920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schiller B, Gianotti LR, Nash K, Knoch D (2014) Individual differences in inhibitory control–relationship between baseline activation in lateral PFC and an electrophysiological index of response inhibition. Cereb Cortex 24:2430–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simpson JR, Drevets WC, Snyder AZ, Gusnard DA, Raichle ME (2001) Emotion-induced changes in human medial prefrontal cortex: II. During anticipatory anxiety. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:688–693.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.688 Google Scholar
  53. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Jernigan TL, Toga AW (1999) In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci 2:859–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Spear LP (2000) The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 24:417–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Steinbeis N, Bernhardt BC, Singer T (2012) Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron 73:1040–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Veronneau MH, Racer KH, Fosco GM, Dishion TJ (2014) The contribution of adolescent effortful control to early adult educational attainment. J Educ Psychol 106:730–743.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vijayakumar N, Whittle S, Dennison M, Yucel M, Simmons J, Allen NB (2014) Development of temperamental effortful control mediates the relationship between maturation of the prefrontal cortex and psychopathology during adolescence: a 4-year longitudinal study. Dev Cogn Neurosci 9:30–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2013.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vogt BA, Finch DM, Olson CR (1992) Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cereb Cortex 2:435–443.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/2.6.435-a Google Scholar
  59. Whalen PJ, Bush G, McNally RJ, Wilhelm S, McInerney SC, Jenike MA, Rauch SL (1998) The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division. Biol Psychiatry 44:1219–1228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00251-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Whittle S, Allen NB, Lubman DI, Yücel M (2006) The neurobiological basis of temperament: towards a better understanding of psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 30:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whittle S et al (2008) Neuroanatomical correlates of temperament in early adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 47:682–693.  https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816bffca CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whittle S, Allen NB, Fornito A, Lubman DI, Simmons JG, Pantelis C, Yucel M (2009) Variations in cortical folding patterns are related to individual differences in temperament. Psychiatry Res 172:68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang W, Li H, Chen J, Liu Q, Liu X, Wang D, Shen J (2015) The association of gray matter volumes in the frontoparietal attention network with temperamental effortful control in young adults: a voxel-based morphometry study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 233:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.04.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Faculty of PsychologySouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Medical PsychologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel)BrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Ghent Experimental Psychiatry (GHEP) LabGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations