Response Hand and Motor Set Differentially Modulate the Connectivity of Brain Pathways During Simple Uni-manual Motor Behavior
We investigated the flexible modulation of undirected functional connectivity (uFC) of brain pathways during simple uni-manual responding. Two questions were central to our interests: (1) does response hand (dominant vs. non-dominant) differentially modulate connectivity and (2) are these effects related to responding under varying motor sets. fMRI data were acquired in twenty right-handed volunteers who responded with their right (dominant) or left (non-dominant) hand (blocked across acquisitions). Within acquisitions, the task oscillated between periodic responses (promoting the emergence of motor sets) or randomly induced responses (disrupting the emergence of motor sets). Conjunction analyses revealed eight shared nodes across response hand and condition, time series from which were analyzed. For right hand responses connectivity of the M1 ←→ Thalamus and SMA ←→ Parietal pathways was more significantly modulated during periodic responding. By comparison, for left hand responses, connectivity between five network pairs (including M1 and SMA, insula, basal ganglia, premotor cortex, parietal cortex, thalamus) was more significantly modulated during random responding. uFC analyses were complemented by directed FC based on multivariate autoregressive models of times series from the nodes. These results were complementary and highlighted significant modulation of dFC for SMA → Thalamus, SMA → M1, basal ganglia → Insula and basal ganglia → Thalamus. The results demonstrate complex effects of motor organization and task demand and response hand on different connectivity classes of fMRI data. The brain’s sub-networks are flexibly modulated by factors related to motor organization and/or task demand, and our results have implications for assessment of medical conditions associated with motor dysfunction.
KeywordsUni-manual responses Motor organization Right-handers fMRI Functional connectivity Granger causality
Preparation of this work was supported by a Career Development Chair from Wayne State University, the Charles H. Gershenson Distinguished Faculty Fellowship from Wayne State University, the Lyckaki-Young Fund from the State of Michigan, the Prechter Family Bipolar Foundation, the Children’s Hospital of Michigan Foundation, the Children’s Research Center of Michigan, the Cohen Neuroscience Endowment, the Dorsey Endowment, a Medical Student Internship from the Detroit Medical Center, and the National Institute of Mental Health (MH 59299).
- Diwadkar VA, Bellani M, Chowdury A, Savazzi S, Perlini C, Marinelli V et al (2017b) Activations in gray and white matter are modulated by uni-manual responses during within and inter-hemispheric transfer: effects of response hand and right-handedness. Brain Imaging Behav. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-017-9750-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- First MD, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Benjamin LS (1997) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders. Biometrics Research Department, NYSPI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, De Vos J, Wenderoth N, Swinnen SP (2010) The neural control of bimanual movements in the elderly: brain regions exhibiting age-related increases in activity, frequency-induced neural modulation, and task-specific compensatory recruitment. Hum Brain Mapp 31(8):1281–1295PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liepmann H (1905) The left hemisphere and action. Republished in 1908 in Drei Aufsatze aus dem Apraxiegebiet. Karger, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Ward BD (2000) Simultaneous inference for fMRI data. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WIGoogle Scholar