Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 171, Issue 2, pp 271–288 | Cite as

Estimating Monthly Energy Fluxes Using Observations of Near-Surface Air Temperature, Humidity and Radiosonde Profiles

  • Daiane V. BrondaniEmail author
  • Otávio C. Acevedo
  • Jônatan D. Tatsch
  • Franciano S. Puhales
Research Article
  • 145 Downloads

Abstract

A new boundary-layer method is proposed to estimate sensible and latent heat fluxes on a monthly scale, based on hourly surface observations of temperature and specific humidity, as well as their vertical profile in the morning. It assumes that advective effects may be neglected over such a time scale, so that temporal tendencies of temperature and specific humidity are controlled solely by the vertical flux convergence over the mixed layer. The growth of the mixed layer in the model is driven by the sensible heat flux and opposed by the mean thermal stratification observed by upper-air soundings over that month. The method is tested for three sites, where the flux estimates are compared to eddy-covariance observations. No filtering of days based on synoptic condition, cloudiness or other external conditions is applied, providing realistic monthly estimates. In the three cases, the flux estimates approach closely the eddy-covariance observations, indicating that the method may be applied to estimate the fluxes at places where only weather station data are available.

Keywords

Air temperature Latent heat flux Sensible heat flux Specific humidity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Santa Maria site has been deployed and maintained by Laboratório de Micrometeorologia from Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, lead by Prof. Debora R. Roberti. The study has been financially supported by Coordenação de Aperfeioamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). We acknowledge the following AmeriFlux sites for their data records: sites US-Ha1 and US-ARM. In addition, funding for AmeriFlux data resources was provided by the U.S. Department of Energys Office of Science. Suggestions from Dr. Jeffrey Freedman and one unknown reviewer have been important in improving the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. Abramowitz G, Leuning R, Clark M, Pitman A (2008) Evaluating the performance of land surface models. J Clim 21(21):5468–5481Google Scholar
  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Howell TA, Jensen ME (2011) Evapotranspiration information reporting: I factors governing measurement accuracy. Agric Water Manag 98(6):899–920Google Scholar
  3. Bagley JE, Kueppers LM, Billesbach DP, Williams IN, Biraud SC, Torn MS (2017) The influence of land cover on surface energy partitioning and evaporative fraction regimes in the us southern great plains. J Geo Res Atmos 122(11):5793–5807Google Scholar
  4. Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, Olson R, Hollinger D, Running S, Anthoni P, Bernhofer C, Davis K, Evans R et al (2001) Fluxnet: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82(11):2415–2434Google Scholar
  5. Bastiaanssen WG, Menenti M, Feddes R, Holtslag A (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (sebal). 1. Formulation. J Hydrol 212:198–212Google Scholar
  6. Bastiaanssen W, Noordman E, Pelgrum H, Davids G, Thoreson B, Allen R (2005) Sebal model with remotely sensed data to improve water-resources management under actual field conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 131(1):85–93Google Scholar
  7. Boughton W (2005) Catchment water balance modelling in australia 1960–2004. Agric Water Manag 71(2):91–116Google Scholar
  8. Brauman KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA (2007) The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:67–98Google Scholar
  9. Bright RM, Davin E, OHalloran T, Pongratz J, Zhao K, Cescatti A (2017) Local temperature response to land cover and management change driven by non-radiative processes. Nat Clim Change 7(4):296Google Scholar
  10. Chu H, Baldocchi DD, John R, Wolf S, Reichstein M (2017) Fluxes all of the time? A primer on the temporal representativeness of fluxnet. J Geo Res Biogeosci 122(2):289–307Google Scholar
  11. Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, Lee RF, Peters WD, Brode RW (2005) Aermod: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: general model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol 44(5):682–693Google Scholar
  12. De Arellano JVG, Van Heerwaarden CC, Van Stratum BJ, Van Den Dries K (2015) Atmospheric boundary layer: integrating air chemistry and land interactions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Deardorff J (1979) Prediction of convective mixed-layer entrainment for realistic capping inversion structure. J Atmos Sci 36(3):424–436Google Scholar
  14. Dow CL, DeWalle DR (2000) Trends in evaporation and bowen ratio on urbanizing watersheds in eastern United States. Water Resour Res 36(7):1835–1843Google Scholar
  15. Drexler JZ, Snyder RL, Spano D, Paw UKT (2004) A review of models and micrometeorological methods used to estimate wetland evapotranspiration. Hydrol Process 18(11):2071–2101Google Scholar
  16. Duan Z, Bastiaanssen W (2013) Estimating water volume variations in lakes and reservoirs from four operational satellite altimetry databases and satellite imagery data. Remote Sens Environ 134:403–416Google Scholar
  17. Duveiller G, Hooker J, Cescatti A (2018) The mark of vegetation change on earths surface energy balance. Nat Commun 9(1):679Google Scholar
  18. Ek M, Holtslag A (2004) Influence of soil moisture on boundary layer cloud development. J Hydrometeorol 5(1):86–99Google Scholar
  19. Fedorovich E, Conzemius R, Mironov D (2004) Convective entrainment into a shear-free, linearly stratified atmosphere: bulk models reevaluated through large eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 61(3):281–295Google Scholar
  20. Fitzjarrald DR, Moore KE (1994) Growing season boundary layer climate and surface exchanges in a subarctic lichen woodland. J Geo Res Atmos 99(D1):1899–1917Google Scholar
  21. Fitzjarrald DR, Acevedo OC, Moore KE (2001) Climatic consequences of leaf presence in the eastern United States. J Clim 14(4):598–614Google Scholar
  22. Foken T (2008) The energy balance closure problem: an overview. Ecol Appl 18(6):1351–1367Google Scholar
  23. Freedman JM, Fitzjarrald DR, Moore KE, Sakai RK (2001) Boundary layer clouds and vegetation–atmosphere feedbacks. J Clim 14(2):180–197Google Scholar
  24. Gentine P, Chhang A, Rigden A, Salvucci G (2016) Evaporation estimates using weather station data and boundary layer theory. Geophys Res Lett 43(22):661–670Google Scholar
  25. Giasson MA, Ellison AM, Bowden RD, Crill PM, Davidson EA, Drake JE, Frey SD, Hadley JL, Lavine M, Melillo JM et al (2013) Soil respiration in a northeastern US temperate forest: a 22-year synthesis. Ecosphere 4(11):1–28Google Scholar
  26. Grimsdell AW, Angevine WM (1998) Convective boundary layer height measurement with wind profilers and comparison to cloud base. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15(6):1331–1338Google Scholar
  27. Kim D, Rhee J (2016) A drought index based on actual evapotranspiration from the Bouchet hypothesis. Geophys Res Lett 43(19):277–285Google Scholar
  28. Leplastrier M, Pitman A, Gupta H, Xia Y (2002) Exploring the relationship between complexity and performance in a land surface model using the multicriteria method. J Geo Res Atmos 107(D20).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000931
  29. Leuning R, Van Gorsel E, Massman WJ, Isaac PR (2012) Reflections on the surface energy imbalance problem. Agric For Meteorol 156:65–74Google Scholar
  30. Li R, Min Q, Lin B (2009) Estimation of evapotranspiration in a mid-latitude forest using the microwave emissivity difference vegetation index (EDVI). Remote Sens Environ 113(9):2011–2018Google Scholar
  31. Lin K, Juang J, Shiu YW, Chang L (2016) Estimating the bowen ratio for application in air quality models by integrating a simplified analytical expression with measurement data. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 55(4):1041–1048Google Scholar
  32. Liu M, Xu X, Xu C, Sun AY, Wang K, Scanlon BR, Zhang L (2017) A new drought index that considers the joint effects of climate and land surface change. Water Resour Res 53(4):3262–3278Google Scholar
  33. Mahrt L (2010) Computing turbulent fluxes near the surface: needed improvements. Agric For Meteorol 150(4):501–509Google Scholar
  34. Min Q, Lin B (2006) Remote sensing of evapotranspiration and carbon uptake at Harvard forest. Remote Sens Environ 100(3):379–387Google Scholar
  35. Min Q, Lin B, Li R (2010) Remote sensing vegetation hydrological states using passive microwave measurements. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 3(1):124–131Google Scholar
  36. Moore KE, Fitzjarrald DR, Sakai RK, Goulden ML, Munger JW, Wofsy SC (1996) Seasonal variation in radiative and turbulent exchange at a deciduous forest in central Massachusetts. J Appl Meteorol 35(1):122–134Google Scholar
  37. Norman JM, Kustas WP, Humes KS (1995) Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agric For Meteorol 77(3–4):263–293Google Scholar
  38. Petropoulos GP (2013) Remote sensing of energy fluxes and soil moisture content. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  39. Petropoulos G, Carlson TN, Wooster MJ (2009) An overview of the use of the simsphere soil vegetation atmosphere transfer (SVAT) model for the study of land–atmosphere interactions. Sensors 9(6):4286–4308Google Scholar
  40. Raz-Yaseef N, Billesbach DP, Fischer ML, Biraud SC, Gunter SA, Bradford JA, Torn MS (2015) Vulnerability of crops and native grasses to summer drying in the us southern great plains. Agric Ecosyst Environ 213:209–218Google Scholar
  41. Renner M, Brust K, Schwärzel K, Volk M, Bernhofer C (2014) Separating the effects of changes in land cover and climate: a hydro-meteorological analysis of the past 60 yr in Saxony, Germany. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:389–405Google Scholar
  42. Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M (2013) Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric For Meteorol 169:156–173Google Scholar
  43. Rigden AJ, Salvucci GD (2015) Evapotranspiration based on equilibrated relative humidity (ETRHEQ): evaluation over the continental US. Water Resourc Res 51(4):2951–2973Google Scholar
  44. Rigden AJ, Salvucci GD (2017) Stomatal response to humidity and CO\(_2\) implicated in recent decline in us evaporation. Glob Change Biol 23(3):1140–1151Google Scholar
  45. Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D et al (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91(8):1015–1058Google Scholar
  46. Saha S, Moorthi S, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Behringer D, Hou YT, Hy Chuang, Iredell M et al (2014) The NCEP climate forecast system version 2. J Clim 27(6):2185–2208Google Scholar
  47. Salvucci GD, Gentine P (2013) Emergent relation between surface vapor conductance and relative humidity profiles yields evaporation rates from weather data. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p 201215844Google Scholar
  48. Savage K, Davidson E (2001) Interannual variation of soil respiration in two New England forests. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 15(2):337–350Google Scholar
  49. Scire JS, Strimaitis DG, Yamartino RJ et al (2000) A users guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model, vol 10. Earth Tech, Inc, ConcordGoogle Scholar
  50. Seibert P, Beyrich F, Gryning SE, Joffre S, Rasmussen A, Tercier P (2000) Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height. Atmos Environ 34(7):1001–1027Google Scholar
  51. Shi TT, Guan DX, Wu JB, Wang AZ, Jin CJ, Han SJ (2008) Comparison of methods for estimating evapotranspiration rate of dry forest canopy: eddy covariance, Bowen ratio energy balance, and Penman-Monteith equation. J Geo Res Atmos 113(D19):D19116Google Scholar
  52. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. Su Z (2002) The surface energy balance system (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(1):85–100Google Scholar
  54. Syktus JI, McAlpine CA (2016) More than carbon sequestration: biophysical climate benefits of restored savanna woodlands. Sci Rep 6(29):194Google Scholar
  55. Tennekes H (1973) A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 30(4):558–567Google Scholar
  56. Tennekes H, Driedonks A (1981) Basic entrainment equations for the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 20(4):515–531Google Scholar
  57. Terrado M, Acuña V, Ennaanay D, Tallis H, Sabater S (2014) Impact of climate extremes on hydrological ecosystem services in a heavily humanized Mediterranean basin. Ecol Indic 37:199–209Google Scholar
  58. Twine TE, Kustas W, Norman J, Cook D, Houser P, Meyers T, Prueger J, Starks P, Wesely M (2000) Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland. Agric For Meteorol 103(3):279–300Google Scholar
  59. Ukkola A, Prentice I (2013) A worldwide analysis of trends in water-balance evapotranspiration. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(10):4177–4187Google Scholar
  60. Urbanski S, Barford C, Wofsy S, Kucharik C, Pyle E, Budney J, McKain K, Fitzjarrald D, Czikowsky M, Munger J (2007) Factors controlling CO\(_2\) exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard forest. J Geo Res Biogeosci 112(G2):G02020Google Scholar
  61. Vickers D, Göckede M, Law B (2010) Uncertainty estimates for 1-h averaged turbulence fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat and sensible heat. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 62(2):87–99Google Scholar
  62. Vihma T, Pirazzini R (2005) On the factors controlling the snow surface and 2-m air temperatures over the Arctic sea ice in winter. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 117(1):73–90Google Scholar
  63. Wang K, Dickinson RE (2012) A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Rev Geophys 50(2):RG2005Google Scholar
  64. Wang X, Guo W, Qiu B, Liu Y, Sun J, Ding A (2017) Quantifying the contribution of land use change to surface temperature in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Atmos Chem Phys 17(8):4989–4996Google Scholar
  65. Wehr R, Saleska S (2015) An improved isotopic method for partitioning net ecosystem–atmosphere CO\(_2\) exchange. Agric For Meteorol 214:515–531Google Scholar
  66. West PC, Narisma GT, Barford CC, Kucharik CJ, Foley JA (2011) An alternative approach for quantifying climate regulation by ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 9(2):126–133Google Scholar
  67. Xu CY, Singh VP (1998) A review on monthly water balance models for water resources investigations. Water Resour Manag 12(1):20–50Google Scholar
  68. Ye S, Li HY, Li S, Leung LR, Demissie Y, Ran Q, Blöschl G (2015) Vegetation regulation on streamflow intra-annual variability through adaption to climate variations. Geophys Res Lett 42(23):10–307Google Scholar
  69. Zhao K, Jackson RB (2014) Biophysical forcings of land-use changes from potential forestry activities in North America. Ecol Monogr 84(2):329–353Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daiane V. Brondani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Otávio C. Acevedo
    • 1
  • Jônatan D. Tatsch
    • 1
  • Franciano S. Puhales
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaSanta MariaBrazil

Personalised recommendations