Advertisement

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

, Volume 171, Issue 1, pp 101–128 | Cite as

Stable Surface-Based Turbulent Layer During the Polar Winter at Dome C, Antarctica: Sodar and In Situ Observations

  • Igor PetenkoEmail author
  • Stefania Argentini
  • Giampietro Casasanta
  • Christophe Genthon
  • Margarita Kallistratova
Research Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

An experiment to investigate atmospheric turbulence was performed at Concordia station (Dome C, Antarctica) during winter 2012, finding significant turbulence in a near-surface layer extending to heights of a few tens of metres, despite the strong stable stratification. The spatial and temporal behaviour of thermal turbulence is examined using a high-resolution sodar, starting from the lowest few metres with a vertical resolution better than 2 m. Sodar observations are complemented by in situ measurements using a weather station and radiometers near the surface, temperature and wind-speed sensors at six levels on a 45-m tower, and radiosondes. The depth of the surface-based turbulent layer (SBTL) at Dome C during the whole winter is directly measured experimentally for the first time, and has an average depth of ≈ 23 m, varying from a few to several tens of metres, while the inversion-layer depth ≈ 380 m. Relationships between the depth of the SBTL and atmospheric parameters such as the temperature, wind speed, longwave radiation, Brunt–Väisälä frequency and Richardson number are shown. The SBTL under steady weather conditions is analyzed and classified into three prevailing types: (i) a very shallow layer with a depth < 15 m, (ii) a shallow layer of depth 15–70 m with uniform internal structure, (iii) a shallow layer of depth 20–70 m with waves. Wave activity in the SBTL is observed during a significant portion of the time, with sometimes regular (with periodicity of 8–15 min) trains of Kelvin–Helmholtz billow-like waves occurring at periods of 20–60 s, and lasting several hours.

Keywords

Dome C Antarctica Internal gravity-shear waves High-resolution sodar Stable boundary layer Surface-based turbulent layer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Italian National Programme of Researches in Antarctica (PNRA) and the Paul-Emile Victor French Polar Institute (IPEV) running the Concordia station for making possible a study in this special place. This research has been done in the framework of the projects “Mass lost in wind flux” (MALOX), and “Concordia multi-process atmospheric studies” (COMPASS) sponsored by the PNRA. A special thanks to P. Grigioni and all the stuff of the Antarctic Meteo-Climatological Observatory at Concordia of the PNRA for providing the data and information from the automatic weather station and radiosoundings obtained from the IPEV/PNRA Project “Routine Meteorological Observations at Station Concordia” (http://www.climantartide.it). M. Kallistratova acknowledges the Grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Project No 16-05-01072. The authors are also thankful to G. Mastrantonio, A. Viola, and A. Conidi for their assistance in preparing the experimental equipment, and to the logistics staff of the Concordia station for their help during the field work. We would like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their careful reading of our manuscript and many insightful comments and constructive suggestions. The authors are thankful to B. van de Wiel, A. Grachev, V. Gryanik, R. Sozzi, E. Vignon, and S. Zilitinkevich for useful discussions and comments.

References

  1. Alpers W, Brandt P, Rubino A (2008) Internal waves generated in the Straits of Gibraltar and Messina: observations from space. In: Barale V, Gade M (eds) Remote sensing of the European Seas. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 319–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6772-3_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. André JC, Mahrt L (1982) The nocturnal surface inversion and influence of clear-air radiative cooling. J Atmos Sci 39:864–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argentini S, Petenko I, Mastrantonio G, Bezverkhnii V, Viola A (2001) Spectral characteristics of East Antarctica meteorological parameters during 1994. J Geophys Res 106:12463–12476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Argentini S, Mastrantonio G, Petenko I, Pietroni I, Viola A (2012) Use of a high-resolution sodar to study surface-layer turbulence at night. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Argentini S, Pietroni I, Mastrantonio G, Viola A, Dargaud G, Petenko I (2014a) Observations of near surface wind speed, temperature and radiative budget at Dome C, Antarctic Plateau during 2005. Antarct Sci 26(1):104–112.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102013000382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Argentini S, Petenko I, Pietroni I, Viola A, Mastrantonio G, Casasanta G, Aristidi E, Ghenton C (2014b) The surface layer observed by a high resolution sodar at Dome C. Antarct Ann Geophys.  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6347 Google Scholar
  7. Baas P, Steeneveld GJ, van de Wiel BJH, Holtslag AAM (2006) Exploring self-correlation in flux-gradient relationships for stably stratified conditions. J Atmos Sci 63(11):3045–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banta RM (2008) Stable-boundary-layer regimes from the perspective of the low-level jet. Acta Geophys 56:58–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banta RM, Newsom RK, Lundquist JK, Pichugina YL, Coulter RL, Mahrt L (2002) Nocturnal low-level jet characteristics over Kansas during CASES-99. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 105:221–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beyrich F (1997) Mixing height estimation from sodar data—a critical discussion. Atmos Environ 31(23):3941–3953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bretherton FP (1969) Waves and turbulence in stably stratified fluids. Radio Sci 4(12):1279–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown EH, Hall FF Jr (1978) Advances in atmospheric acoustics. Rev Geophys 16:47–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brun E, Six D, Picard Vionnet V, Arnaud L, Bazile E, Boone A, Bouchard A, Genthon C, Guidars V, Le Moigne P, Rabier F, Seity Y (2011) Snow/atmosphere coupled simulation at Dome C, Antarctica. J Glaciol 52:721–736.  https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311797409794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casasanta G, Pietroni I, Petenko I, Argentini S (2014) Observed and modelled mixing layer height at Dome C, Antarctica. Part I: the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 151:597–608.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9907-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drüe C, Heinemann G (2007) Characteristics of intermittent turbulence in the upper stable layer over Greenland. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 124:361–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-007-9175-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Emmanuel CB, Bean BR, McAllister LU, Pollard JR (1972) Observation of Helmholtz waves in the lower atmosphere with an acoustic sounder. J Atmos Sci 29:886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eymard L, Weill A (1979) A study of gravity waves in the planetary boundary layer by acoustic sounding. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 17:231–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galperin B, Sukoriansky S, Anderson PS (2007) On the critical Richardson number in stably stratified turbulence. Atmos Sci Lett 8:65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garratt JR, Brost RA (1981) Radiative cooling within and above the nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 38:2730–2746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Genthon C, Gallée H, Six D, Grigioni P, Pellegrini A (2013) Two years of atmospheric boundary layer observations on a 45-m tower at Dome C on the Antarctic plateau. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:3218–3232.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gossard EE, Richter JH, Atlas D (1970) Internal waves in the atmosphere from high-resolution radar measurements. J Geophys Res Oceans Atmos 75:3523–3536.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JC075i018p03523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gossard EE, Gaynor JE, Zamora RJ, Neff WD (1985) Fine structure of elevated stable 1ayers observed by sounder and in situ tower sensors. J Atmos Sci 42:21562169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grachev AA, Fairall CW, Persson POG, Andreas EL, Guest PS (2005) Stable boundary layer scaling regimes: the SHEBA data. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 116:201–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grachev AA, Andreas EL, Fairall CW, Guest PS, Persson POG (2013) The critical Richardson number and limits of applicability of local similarity theory in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147:51–82.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9771-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gur’yanov AE, Kallistratova MA, Kutyrev AS, Petenko IV, Scheglov PV, Tokovinin AA (1992) The contribution of the lower atmospheric layers to the seeing at some mountain observatories. Astron Astrophys 262:373–381Google Scholar
  26. Holtslag AAM, Nieuwstadt FTM (1986) Scaling the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 36:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooke WH, Hall FF Jr, Gossard EE (1973) Observed generation of an atinospheric gravity wave by shear instability in the mean flow of the planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 5:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Howard L (1961) Note on a paper of John W. Miles. J Fluid Mech 10:509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joffre SM, Kangas M, Heikinheimo M, Kitaigorodskii SA (2001) Variability of the stable and unstable atmospheric boundary-layer height and its scales over a boreal forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 99(3):429–450.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10189565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kallistratova MA, Petenko IV (1993) Aspect sensitivity of sound backscattering in the atmospheric boundary layer. Appl Phys B 57:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King JC, Mobbs SD, Darby MS, Rees JM (1987) Observations of an internal gravity wave in the lower troposphere at Halley, Antarctica. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kitaigorodskii SA, Joffre SM (1988) In search of a simple scaling for the height of the stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Tellus 40A:419–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0870.1988.tb00359.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klipp CL, Mahrt L (2004) Flux–gradient relationship, self-correlation and intermittency in the stable boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130(601):2087–2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kouznetsov RD (2009) The summertime ABL structure over an Antarctic oasis with a vertical Doppler sodar. Meteorol Z 18:163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyulyukin VS, Kallistratova MA, Kouznetsov RD, Kuznetsov DD, Chunchuzov IP, Chirokova GYu (2015) Internal gravity-shear waves in the atmospheric boundary layer by the acoustic remote sensing data. Izv Atmos Ocean Phys 51(2):193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahrt L (1999) Stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 90:375–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahrt L (2010) Variability and maintenance of turbulence in the very stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 135:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mahrt L (2014) Stably stratified atmospheric boundary layers. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 46:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahrt L, Vickers D (2006) Extremely weak mixing in stable conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 119:19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mahrt L, Sun J, Blumen W, Delaney T, Oncley S (1998) Nocturnal boundary layer regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 88:255–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mahrt L, Richardson S, Seaman N, Stauffer D (2012) Turbulence in the nocturnal boundary layer with light and variable winds. Q J R Meteorol Soc 138:1430–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Melgarejo JW, Deardorff JW (1974) Stability functions for the boundary layer resistance laws based upon observed boundary layer heights. J Atmos Sci 31:1324–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miles JW (1961) On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J Fluid Mech 10:496–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mironov D, Fedorovich E (2010) On the limiting effect of the Earth’s rotation on the depth of a stably stratified boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136:1473–1480.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neff W, Helmig D, Grachev A, Davis D (2008) A study of boundary layer behavior associated with high NO concentrations at the South Pole using a minisodar, tethered balloon, and sonic anemometer. Atmos Environ 42(12):2762–2779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nieuwstadt FTM (1984) The turbulent structure of the stable, nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41:2202–2216.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041%3c2202:ttsots%3e2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Obukhov AM (1949) Structure of the temperature field in a turbulent flow. Izv Acad Nauk SSSR Ser Geogr Geofiz 13:58–69Google Scholar
  48. Petenko I, Mastrantonio G, Viola A, Argentini S, Pietroni I (2012) Wavy vertical motions in the ABL observed by sodar. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:125–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9638-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Petenko I, Pietroni I, Casasanta G, Argentini S, Viola A, Mastrantonio G (2013) Thermal turbulence in the very stable boundary layer: sodar observations at Dome C, Antarctica. In: Geophysical research abstracts, V.15, EGU2013-9442, EGU general assembly, Austria, Vienna, April 2013Google Scholar
  50. Petenko I, Argentini S, Pietroni I, Viola A, Mastrantonio G, Casasanta G, Aristidi E, Bouchez G, Agabi A, Bondoux E (2014) Observations of optically active turbulence in the planetary boundary layer by sodar at the Concordia astronomical observatory, Dome C, Antarctica. Astron Astrophys 568(A44):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201323299 Google Scholar
  51. Petenko I, Argentini S, Kallistratova M, Mastrantonio G, Viola A, Sozzi R, Casasanta G, Conidi A (2015) Spatio-temporal pattern of the surface-based turbulent layer during polar winter at Dome C, Antarctica as observed by sodar. In: 15th EMS annual meeting and 12th European conference on applications of meteorology (ECAM), Sofia, 7–11 Sep 2015Google Scholar
  52. Petenko I, Argentini S, Casasanta G, Kallistratova M, Viola A (2016) Wavelike structures observed in the turbulent layer during the morning development of convection at Dome C, Antarctica. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 161:289–307.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0173-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pietroni I, Argentini S, Petenko I, Sozzi R (2012) Measurements and parametrizations of the atmospheric boundary-layer height at Dome C, Antarctica. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 143:189–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9675-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pietroni I, Argentini S, Petenko I (2014) One year of surface-based temperature inversions at Dome C, Antarctica. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 150:131–151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9861-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Salmond JA, McKendry IG (2005) A review of turbulence in the very stable boundary layer and its implications for air quality. Prog Phys Geogr 29:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schumann U, Gerz T (1995) Turbulent mixing in stably stratified shear flows. J Appl Meteorol 34:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seaman NL, Deng A, Stauffer DR (2002) Evaluation of a meteorological model for inter-regional transport. Final report CRC project no. A-28. Pennsylvania State University. http://www.crcao.com/reports/recentstudies00-02/A-28%20Final%20Report.PDF
  58. Smedman A (1988) Observations of a multi-level turbulence structure in a very stable atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 44:231–253.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sorbjan Z (2006) Local structure of turbulence in stably stratified boundary layers. J Atmos Sci 63:1526–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sorbjan Z (2010) Gradient-based scales and similarity laws in the stable boundary layer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136(650A):1243–1254Google Scholar
  61. Sorbjan Z, Grachev AA (2010) An evaluation of the flux–gradient relationship in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 135(3):385–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sun J, Lenschow D, Burns S, Banta R, Newsom R, Coulter R, Frasier S, Ince T, Nappo C, Balsley BB, Jensen M, Mahrt L, Miller D, Skelly B (2004) Intermittent turbulence in stable boundary layers and the processes that generate it. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 110:255–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sun J, Mahrt L, Banta RM, Pichugina YL (2012) Turbulence regimes and turbulence intermittency in the stable boundary layer during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 69:338–351.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-082.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sun J et al (2015) Review of wave-turbulence interactions in the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Rev Geophys 53:956–993.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tatarskii VI (1971) The effects of the turbulent atmosphere on wave propagation. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  66. Van de Wiel BJH, Moene A, Hartogensis O, de Bruin HAR, Holtslag AAM (2002a) Intermittent turbulence in the stable boundary layer over land. Part I: a bulk model. J Atmos Sci 59:942–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van de Wiel BJH, Moene A, Ronda RI, de Bruin HAR, Holtslag AAM (2002b) Intermittent turbulence in the stable boundary layer over land. Part II: a system dynamics approach. J Atmos Sci 59:2567–2581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van de Wiel BJH, Moene A, Hartogensis O, de Bruin HAR, Holtslag AAM (2003) Intermittent turbulence in the stable boundary layer over land. Part III: a classification for observations during CASES-99. J Atmos Sci 60:2509–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Hooijdonk IGS, Donda J, Clercx H, Bosveld F, van de Wiel BJH (2015) Shear capacity as prognostic for nocturnal boundary-layer regimes. J Atmos Sci 72:1518–1532.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0140.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Ulden AP, Holtslag AAM (1985) Estimation of atmospheric boundary layer parameters for diffusion applications. J Clim Appl Meteorol 24:1196–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1985)024%3c1196:EOABLP%3e2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vignon E, van de Wiel BJH, van Hooijdonk IGS, Genthon C, van der Linden SJA, van Hooft JA, Baas P, Maurel W, Traullé O, Casasanta G (2017a) Stable boundary-layer regimes at Dome C, Antarctica: observation and analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143(704):1241–1253.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2998 (Part A) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Vignon E, Genthon C, Barral H, Amory C, Picard G, Gallée H, Casasanta G, Argentini S (2017b) Momentum and heat flux parametrization at Dome C, Antarctica: a sensitivity study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 162(2):341–367.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0192-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yamada T (1976) On the similarity functions A, B and C of the planetary boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 33:781–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zilitinkevich SS, Elperin T, Kleeorin N, Rogachevskii I (2007) Energy- and flux-budget (EFB) turbulence closure model for stably stratified flows part I: steady-state, homogeneous regimes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 125(2):167–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, CNRRomeItaly
  2. 2.A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics RASMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Laboratoire de Meteolorogie DynamiqueCNRSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations