A Numerically Efficient Parametrization of Turbulent Wind-Turbine Flows for Different Thermal Stratifications
The wake characteristics of a wind turbine in a turbulent atmospheric boundary layer under different thermal stratifications are investigated by means of large-eddy simulation with the geophysical flow solver EULAG. The turbulent inflow is based on a method that imposes the spectral energy distribution of a neutral boundary-layer precursor simulation, the turbulence-preserving method. This method is extended herein to make it applicable for different thermal stratification regimes (convective, stable, neutral) by including suitable turbulence assumptions, which are deduced from velocity fields of a diurnal-cycle precursor simulation. The wind-turbine-wake characteristics derived from simulations that include the parametrization result in good agreement with diurnal-cycle-driven wind-turbine simulations. Furthermore, different levels of accuracy are tested in the parametrization assumptions, representing the thermal stratification. These range from three-dimensional matrices of the precursor-simulation wind field to individual values. The resulting wake characteristics are similar, even for the simplest parametrization set-up, making the diurnal-cycle precursor simulation non-essential for the wind-turbine simulations. Therefore, the proposed parametrization results in a computationally fast, simple, and efficient tool for analyzing the effects of different thermal stratifications on wind-turbine wakes by means of large-eddy simulation.
KeywordsAtmospheric boundary layer Diurnal cycle Large-eddy simulation Turbulence Wind-turbine wake
The authors thank Fernando Porté-Agel and Gert-Jan Steeneveld for the constructive discussion on the turbulence preserving method. Further, we thank Mark Zagar for providing the airfoil data of the 10-MW reference wind turbine from DTU. This work was performed within the project LIPS, funded by the Federal Ministry of Economy and Energy on the basis of a resolution of the German Bundestag under the contract number 0325518.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e.V. (www.gauss-centre.eu) for funding this project by providing computing time on the GCS Supercomputer SuperMUC at Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (LRZ, www.lrz.de).
- Doyle JD, Gaberšek S, Jiang Q, Bernardet L, Brown JM, Dörnbrack A, Filaus E, Grubišic V, Kirshbaum DJ, Knoth O, Koch S, Schmidli J, Stiperski I, Vosper S, Zhong S (2011) An intercomparison of t-rex mountain-wave simulations and implications for mesoscale predictability. Mon Weather Rev 139:2811–2831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fröhlich J (2006) Large Eddy simulation turbulenter Strömungen. Teubner Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden, p 414 (in German)Google Scholar
- Grimsdell AW, Angevine WM (2002) Observations of the afternoon transition of the convective boundary layer. J Appl Meteorol 41(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041%3c3C0003:OOTATO%3e3E2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelley CL, Ennis BL (2016) Swift site atmospheric characterization. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM, USAGoogle Scholar
- Naughton JW, Heinz S, Balas M, Kelly R, Gopalan H, Lindberg W, Gundling C, Rai R, Sitaraman J, Singh M (2011) Turbulence and the isolated wind turbine. In: 6th AIAA theoretical fluid mechanics conference, 27–30 June 2011, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 1–19Google Scholar
- Shapiro A, Fedorovich E (2010) Analytical description of a nocturnal low-level jet. Q J R Meteorol Soc 136(650):1255–1262Google Scholar
- Smolarkiewicz PK, Prusa JM (2002) Forward-in-time differencing for fluids: simulation of geophysical turbulence. In: Turbulent flow computation, Kluwer, Boston, pp 279–312Google Scholar
- Witha B, Steinfeld G, Heinemann D (2014) Wind energy—impact of turbulence. In: Hölling M, Peinke J, Ivanell S (eds) High-resolution offshore wake simulations with the LES model PALM. Springer, Oldenburg, pp 175–181Google Scholar