Microfluidics-based device for the measurement of blood viscosity and its modeling based on shear rate, temperature, and heparin concentration
- 10 Downloads
Blood viscosity measurements are crucial for the diagnosis and understanding of a range of hematological and cardiovascular diseases. Such measurements are heavily used in monitoring patients during and after surgeries, which necessitates the development of a highly accurate viscometer that uses a minimal amount of blood. In this work, we have designed and implemented a microfluidic device that was used to measure fluid viscosity with a high accuracy using less than 10 μl of blood. The device was further used to construct a blood viscosity model based on temperature, shear rate, and anti-coagulant concentration. The model has an R-squared value of 0.950. Finally, blood protein content was changed to simulate diseased conditions and blood viscosity was measured using the device and estimated using the model constructed in this work. Simulated diseased conditions were clearly detected when comparing estimated viscosity values using the model and the measured values using the device, proving the applicability of the setup in the detection of rheological anomalies and in disease diagnosis.
KeywordsMicrofluidic device Blood viscosity Rheological model Point of care diagnostics Blood viscometer
This work is supported in part by the Scientific Research Support Fund (SRSF) at the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and the Deanship of Research at the Jordan University of Science and Technology.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
- J. T. Busher, in Clin. Methods Hist. Phys. Lab. Exam., edited by H. K. Walker, W. D. Hall, and J. W. Hurst, 3rd ed. (Butterworths, Boston, 1990)Google Scholar
- H.C. Kwaan, Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 44, 167 (2010)Google Scholar
- C.S. Lo, P. D. Prewett, G. J. Davies, C. J Anthony, and K Vanner, World Congr. Eng. 2007 II, 1379 (2007)Google Scholar
- G.N. Marinakis, J.C. Barbenel, S.G. Tsangaris, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] (2016)Google Scholar
- A.R. Pries, D. Neuhaus, P. Gaehtgens, Am. J. Phys. 263, H1770 (1992)Google Scholar
- D. Rubenstein, W. Yin, and M. D. Frame, Biofluid Mechanics: An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, Macrocirculation, and Microcirculation (Academic Press, 2015)Google Scholar
- Sahu, Nageswari, Banerjee, Puniyani, Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 19, 17 (1998)Google Scholar
- F. Yilmaz, M. Gundoğdu, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J. 20 (2008)Google Scholar