Advertisement

Biomedical Microdevices

, 21:61 | Cite as

CoCrMo alloys ions release behavior by TiNbN coating: an in vitro study

  • Vincenza Ragone
  • Elena Canciani
  • Carlo Alberto Biffi
  • Riccardo D’AmbrosiEmail author
  • Rossella Sanvito
  • Claudia Dellavia
  • Emanuela Galliera
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of the study was to show in vitro the greater inertness to the corrosion body fluid of TiNbN coating than the CoCrMo alloy substrate. The prosthetic component under study was a femoral component of total knee prosthesis in CoCrMo alloy coated in TiNbN with Physical Vapor Deposition technique immersed in static Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBS) (pH = 6) for at least 34 months at a constant temperature of 37 °C. Another uncoated prosthetic component of CoCrMo alloy with the same type and size was left in static immersion in the same solution and for the same period of time. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was performed to investigate adhesion and proliferation at 24, 48, 72 h after seeding of 104 sub-confluents osteoblast-like cells (SaOS-2) cells on scaffold. The results of the study showed a reduction in the concentration of the metal ions released from the TiNbN-coated femoral component surface compared to the uncoated surface in the HBS solution. The overall reduction of the ions for the TiNbN-coated femoral component compared to the uncoated one was 80.1 ± 2%, 62.5% ± 8% and 48% ± 10% for Co, Cr, Mo, respectively (p < 0.01). SEM analysis confirmed the healthy state of the cells, the cellular adhesion and proliferation of SaOS-2 on the TiNbN-coated specimen. Although the results observed in vitro for the TiNbN coating are encouraging, clinical studies are certainly needed to be performed in order to understand how these positive findings can be translated in vivo and to determine the clinical benefit of TiNbN coating.

Keywords

Cobalt-chromium alloy Biocorrosion Titanium niobium nitride coating Biocompatibility Immersion test 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. M.C. Aprea, M.L. Scapellato, M.C. Valsania, A. Perico, L. Perbellini, M.C. Ricossa, M. Pradella, S. Negri, I. Iavicoli, P. Lovreglio, F. Salamon, M. Bettinelli, P. Apostoli, Methodology to define biological reference values in the environmental and occupational fields: The contribution of the Italian Society for Reference Values (SIVR). Med. Lav. 108, 138–148 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. A.D. Bloemke, H.D. Clarke, Prevalence of self-reported metal allergy in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty. J. Knee Surg. 28, 243–246 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Dalal, V. Pawar, K. McAllister, C. Weaver, N. Hallab, Orthopedic implant cobalt-alloy particles produce greater toxicity and inflammatory cytokines than titanium alloy and zirconium alloy-based particles in vitro, in human osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and macrophages. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100, 2147–2158 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DIN 50142-03. Testing of metallic materials; Flat bending fatigue testGoogle Scholar
  5. S.C. Gad, Acute and chronic systemic chromium toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 86, 149–157 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. E.Y. Gutmanas, I. Gotman, PIRAC Ti nitride coated Ti-6AI-4V head against UHMWPE acetabular cup-hip wear simulator study. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 15, 327–330 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. N. Hallab, K. Merritt, J.J. Jacobs, Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 83, 428 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. T. Hanawa, T. Metal ion release from metal implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 24, 745–752 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ISO 18452:2005 Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) Determination of thickness of ceramic films by contact-probe profilometerGoogle Scholar
  10. ISO 5832-11:2014 Implants for surgery -- Metallic materials -- Part 11: Wrought titanium 6-aluminium 7-niobium alloyGoogle Scholar
  11. ISO 5832-3:2016 Implants for surgery -- Metallic materials -- Part 3: Wrought titanium 6-aluminium 4-vanadium alloyGoogle Scholar
  12. ISO 5832-4:2014 Implants for surgery — Metallic materials — Part 4: Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum casting alloyGoogle Scholar
  13. R.E. Jones, Hexavalent chrome: Threshold concept for carcinogenicity. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 3, 20–34 (1990)Google Scholar
  14. J.J. Joshua, J.L. Gilbert, R.M.U.C.c. review, Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. 80, 268–282 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Kasemo, J. Lausmaa, Surface science aspects on inorganic biomaterials. CRC Crit. Rev. Clin. Neurobiol. 2, 335–380 (1986)Google Scholar
  16. E. Kobayashi, T.J. Wang, H. Doi, T. Yoneyama, H. Hamanaka, Mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy dental castings. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 9, 567–574 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Léonard, R.R. Lauwerys, Carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chromium. Mutat. Res. 76, 227–239 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Manivasagam, D. Dhinasekaran, A. Rajamanickam, Biomedical implants: Corrosion and its prevention - a review. Recent Pat Corros Sci 2, 40–54 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Metikos-Huković, Z. Pilić, R. Babić, D. Omanović, Influence of alloying elements on the corrosion stability of CoCrMo implant alloy in Hank's solution. Acta Biomater. 2, 693–700 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Y. Okazaki, E. Gotoh, Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterials in vitro. Biomaterials 26, 11–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D.J. Paustenbach, B.E. Tvermoes, K.M. Unice, B.L. Finley, B.D. Kerger, A review of the health hazards posed by cobalt. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 43, 316–362 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. T.T. Roberts, C.M. Haines, R.L. Uhl, Allergic or hypersensitivity reactions to Orthopaedic implants. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 25, 693–702 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. A.P. Serro, C. Completo, R. Colaço, F. dos Santos, C.L. da Silva, J.M.S. Cabral, H. Araújo, E. Pires, B. Saramago, A comparative study of titanium nitrides, TiN, TiNbN and TiCN, as coatings for biomedical applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 203, 3701–3707 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. K.M. Shah, J.M. Wilkinson, A. Gartland, Cobalt and chromium exposure affects osteoblast function and impairs the mineralization of prosthesis surfaces in vitro. J. Orthop. Res. 33, 1663–1670 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. F.W.J. Sunderman, S.M. Hopfer, T. Swift, W.N. Rezuke, L. Ziebka, P. Highman, B. Edwards, M. Folcik, H.R. Gossling, Cobalt, chromium, and nickel concentrations in body fluids of patients with porous-coated knee or hip prostheses. J. Orthop. Res. 7, 307–315 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. J.P. Thyssen, T. Menné, Metal allergy-a review on exposures, penetration, genetics, prevalence, and clinical implications. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 23, 309–318 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. U. Türkan, O. Öztürk, A.E. Eroglu, Metal ion release from TiN coated CoCrMo orthopedic implant material. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 5020–5027 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. UNI CEN/TS 1071-7:2003 Advanced technical ceramics - Methods of test for ceramic coatings - Determination of hardness and Young's modulus by instrumented indentation testingGoogle Scholar
  29. UNI EN 1071-2:2003 Advanced technical ceramics - methods of test for ceramic coatings - determination of coating thickness by the crater grinding methodGoogle Scholar
  30. R.P. van Hove, I.N. Sierevelt, B.J. van Royen, P.A. Nolte, Titanium- nitride coating of Orthopaedic implants: A review of the literature. Biomed. Res. Int. 485975, 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. VDI 3198 Verein Deutscher Ingenieure Normen, VDI-Verlag, Dusseldorf, 1991Google Scholar
  32. H.G. Willert, G.H. Buchhorn, A. Fayyazi, R. Flury, M. Windler, G. Köster, C.H. Lohmann, Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87, 28–36 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. A. Wisbey, P.J. Gregson, M. Tuke, Application of PVD TiN coating to co-Cr-Mo based surgical implants. Biomaterials 8, 477–480 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Development Department, Permedica S.p.A.Merate (LC)Italy
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental SciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  3. 3.National Research Council, Institute of Condensed Matter Chemistry and Technologies for Energy, Unit of Lecco, CNR ICMATELeccoItaly
  4. 4.IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic InstituteMilanItaly
  5. 5.Milan Department of Biomedical Sciences for HealthUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations