Biomedical Microdevices

, 21:49 | Cite as

A portable microfluidic platform for rapid determination of microbial load and somatic cell count in milk

  • Gamze Düven
  • Barbaros ÇetinEmail author
  • Hüseyin Kurtuldu
  • Gülten Tiryaki Gündüz
  • Şebnem Tavman
  • Duygu Kışla


Microfluidics systems that have been emerged in the last 20 years and used for processing the fluid in a microchannel structure at microliter levels are alternative to the conventional methods. The objective of the study is to develop a microfluidic platform for determination of the microbial load and the number of somatic cells in milk. For this purpose, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chip with a channel size of 300 μm × 60 μm was produced. Cells/bacteria labeled with fluorescent stain in milk were counted with the proposed microfluidic platform and the results were compared with the reference cell concentration/the bacterial counts by conventional method. It was found that our platform could count somatic and bacterial cells with an accuracy above 80% in 20 min run for each analysis. The portable overall platform has an overall dimension of 25x25x25 cm and weighs approximately 9 kg.


Microfluidics Quality of milk Somatic cell count Bacteria count 



Financial support from the Turkish Scientific and Technical Research Council (Grant No. 114 M597) is greatly appreciated. B.Ç. would like to acknowledge funding from the Turkish Academy of Sciences through Outstanding Young Scientist Program (TUBA-GEBIP) and Science Academy Distinguished Young Scientist Award (BAGEP).


  1. AOAC, 1984, Official Method of Analysis, 14th Ed., Washington D.C., USA: Assoc. Official Analytical ChemistsGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Cetin, M.B. Ozer, M.E. Solmaz, Microfluidic bio-particle manipulation for biotechnology. Biochem. Eng. J. 92, 63–82 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. B. Cetin, M.B. Ozer, E. Cagatay, S. Buyukkocak, An integrated acoustic and dielectrophoretic particle manipulation in a microfluidic device for particle wash and separation fabricated by mechanical machining. Biomicrofluidics 10, 014112 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Delibato, A. Gattuso, A. Minucci, B. Auricchio, D. De Medici, L. Toti, M. Castagnola, E. Capoluongo, M.V Gianfranceschi, PCR experion automated electrophoresis system to detect Listeria monocytogenes in foods. J. Sep. Sci. 32(21), 3817–3821 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Dow, K. Kotz, S. Gruszka, J. Holder, J. Fiering, Acoustic separation in plastic microfluidics for rapid detection of bacteria in blood using engineered bacteriophage. Lab Chip 18(6), 923–932 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. A.C. Fernandes, C.M. Duarte, F.A. Cardoso, R. Bexiga, S. Cardoso, P.P. Freitas, Lab-on-chip cytometry based on magnetoresistive sensors for bacteria detection in milk. Sensors 14(8), 15496–15524 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Z. Fu, S. Rogelj, T.L. Kieft, Rapid detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by immunomagnetic separation and real-time PCR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 99(1), 47–57 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. J.L. Garcia-Cordero, L.M. Barrett, R. O’Kennedy, A.J. Ricco, Microfluidic sedimentation cytometer for milk quality and bovine mastitis monitoring. Biomed. Microdevices 12(6), 1051–1059 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J.P. Golden, J. Verbarg, P.B. Howell, L.C. Shriver-Lake, F.S. Ligler, Automated processing integrated with a microflow cytometer for pathogen detection in clinical matrices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 40(1), 10–16 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. T.S. Gunasekera, P.V. Attfield, D.A. Veal, A flow cytometry method for rapid detection and enumeration of total bacteria in milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66(3), 1228–1232 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. T.S. Gunasekera, D.A. Veal, P.V. Attfield, Potential for broad applications of flow cytometry and fluorescence techniques in microbiological and somatic cell analyses of milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 85(3), 269–279 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. L. Guo, J. Feng, Z. Fang, J. Xu, X. Lu, Application of microfluidic “lab-on-a-chip” for the detection of mycotoxins in foods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 46(2), 252–263 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Ikeda, N. Yamaguchi, M. Nasu, Rapid on-chip flow cytometric detection of listeria monocytogenes in milk. J. Health Sci. 55(5), 851–885 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Y. Li, C. Zhang, D. Xing, Integrated microfluidic reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for rapid detection of food- or waterborne pathogenic rotavirus. Anal. Biochem. 415(2), 87–96 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Metzger, R.A. Frobel, W.M. Dunne, Rapid simultaneous identification and quantitation of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa directly from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens using automated microscopy. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 79(2), 160–165 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J.S. Moon, H.C. Koo, Y.S. Joo, S.H. Jeon, D.S. Hur, C.I. Chung, H.S. Jo, Y.H. Park, Application of a new portable microscopic somatic cell counter with disposable plastic Chip for Milk analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 90(5), 2253–2259 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Mortari, L. Lorenzelli, Recent sensing technologies for pathogen detection in milk: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 60, 8–21 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Ohlsson, K. Petersson, P. Augustsson, T. Laurell, Acoustic impedance matched buffers enable separation of bacteria from blood cells at high cell concentrations. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 9156 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Pöhlmann, Y. Wang, M. Humenik, B. Heidenreich, M. Gareis, M. Sprinzl, Rapid, specific and sensitive electrochemical detection of foodborne bacteria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24(9), 2766–2771 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. X.X. Wen, B.L. Xu, W.X. Wang, G.T. Liang, B. Chen, Y.M. Yang, D.Y. Liu, Rapid identification of multiple bacteria on a microfluidic chip. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 42(6), 791–798 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Z. Wu, B. Willing, J. Bjerketorp, J.K. Jansson, K. Hjort, Soft inertial microfluidics for high throughput separation of bacteria from human blood cells. Lab Chip 9(9), 1193–1199 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Yamaguchi, H. Ohba, M. Nasu, Simple detection of small amounts of Pseudomonas cells in milk by using a microfluidic device. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 43(6), 631–636 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. H. Yasaki, T. Yasui, T. Yanagida, N. Kaji, M. Kanai, K. Nagashima, Y. Baba, A real-time simultaneous measurement on a microfluidic device for individual bacteria discrimination. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 260, 746–752 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Zeinali, B. Çetin, S. Oliaei, Y. Karpat, Fabrication of continuous flow microfluidics device with 3D electrode structures for high throughput DEP applications using mechanical machining. Electrophoresis, Special Issue on Dielectrophoresis 36(13), 1432–1442 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. S.S. Zeng, E.N. Escobar, S.P. Hart, L. Hinckley, M. Baulthaus, G.T. Robinson, G. Jahnke, Comparative study of the effects of testing laboratory, counting method, storage and shipment on somatic cell counts in goat milk. Small Rumin. Res. 31(2), 103–107 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food EngineeringEge UniversityIzmirTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Food EngineeringIzmir Institute of TechnologyIzmirTurkey
  3. 3.Microfluidics & Lab-on-a-chip Research Group, Mechanical Engineering DepartmentI.D. Bilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Faculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical EngineeringBaskent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations