Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 34:57 | Cite as

The problem of mooted models for analyses of microbiome causality

  • Justin DonhauserEmail author
  • Sara Worley
  • Michael Bradie
  • Juan L. Bouzat
Article
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Target Article: How Causal are Microbiomes

Abstract

Lynch, Parke, and O’Malley highlight the need for better evaluative criteria for causal explanations in microbiome research. They propose new interventionist criteria, show that paradigmatic examples of microbiome explanations are flawed using those criteria, and suggest numerous ways microbiome explanations can be improved. While we endorse their primary criticisms and suggestions for improvements in microbiome research, we make several observations regarding the use of mooted causal models in microbiome research that have significant implications for their overall argument. In sum, we contend that their critique is too modest and that even flawed causal inferences like those they criticize can be valuable for generating better causal models and evaluating explanatory outcomes in individual cases.

Keywords

Microbiome Causal explanation Helicobacter pylori Koch’s postulates Interventionism Mooted models 

Notes

References

  1. Archimandritis AJ et al (2003) The incidence of Helicobacter pylori is not increased in obese people, but the risk of duodenal ulcer is higher in H. pylori-positive people of high obesity. J Clin Gastroenterol 36:184–185.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200302000-00022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen LW, Kuo SF, Chen CH, Chien CH, Lin CL, Chien RN (2018) A community-based study on the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and obesity. Sci Rep 8(1):10746.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28792-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho I et al (2005) Helicobacter pylori and overweight status in the United States: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Epidemiol 162:579–584.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwi237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ioannou GN, Weiss NS, Kearney DJ (2005) Is Helicobacter pylori seropositivity related to body mass index in the United States? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:765–772.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02369.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kawano S et al (2001) Helicobacter pylori infection does not affect serum leptin concentration and body mass index (BMI) in asymptomatic subjects. J Gastroenterol 36:579–580.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350170064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kyriazanos ID et al (2002) The incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection is not increased among obese young individuals in Greece. J Clin Gastroenterol 34:541–546.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200205000-00012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levenstein S, Rosenstock S, Jacobsen RK, Jorgensen T (2015) Psychological stress increases risk for peptic ulcer, regardless of helicobacter pylori infection or use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13(3):498–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marshall BJ (2006) Helicobacter connections. ChemMedChem 1:783–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marshall BJ et al (1985) Attempt to fulfil Koch’s postulates for pyloric Campylobacter. Med J Aust 142:436–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA

Personalised recommendations