Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 34:50 | Cite as

Further clarification on permissive and instructive causes

  • Brett CalcottEmail author
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

I respond to recent criticism of my analysis of the permissive-instructive distinction and outline problems with the alternative analysis on offer. Amongst other problems, I argue that the use of formal measures is unclear and unmotivated, that the distinction is conflated with others that are not equivalent, and that no good reasons are provided for thinking the alternative model or formal measure tracks what biologists are interested in. I also clarify my own analysis where it has been misunderstood or ignored.

Keywords

Permissive Instructive Specificity Information Causation Development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The initial ideas for much of this work occurred during my time in the Theory and Method in Biosciences group at the University of Sydney with Paul Griffiths, Arnaud Pocheville, and Karola Stotz, where funding was provided by Swansea University Templeton World Charity Foundation. Many thanks to Maureen O’Malley and Emily Parke for reading and commenting on drafts.

References

  1. Bourrat P (2019a) Variation of information as a measure of one-to-one causal specificity. Eur J Philos Sci 9(1):11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-018-0224-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourrat P (2019b) On Calcott’s permissive and instructive cause distinction. Biol Philos 34(1):1.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9654-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calcott B (2017) Causal specificity and the instructive-permissive distinction. Biol Philos 32(4):481–505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-017-9568-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Griffiths PE, Pocheville A, Calcott B, Stotz K, Kim H, Knight R (2015) Measuring causal specificity. Philos Sci 82(4):529–555.  https://doi.org/10.1086/682914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kerr B, Godfrey-Smith P, Feldman MW (2004) What is altruism? Trends Ecol Evol 19(3):135–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirschner MW, Gerhart JC (2006) The plausibility of life: resolving Darwin’s dilemma. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  7. Lemmon V, Burden SM, Payne HR, Elmslie GJ, Hlavin ML (1992) Neurite growth on different substrates: permissive versus instructive influences and the role of adhesive strength. J Neurosci 12(3):818–826.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-03-00818.1992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levy A (2011) Game theory, indirect modeling, and the origin of morality. J Philos 108(4):171–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Wagner A (2011) The origins of evolutionary innovations: a theory of transformative change in living systems, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Woodward J (2010) Causation in biology: stability, specificity, and the choice of levels of explanation. Biol Philos 25(3):287–318.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-010-9200-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Charles Perkins CentreThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations