Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas
- 13 Downloads
Koonin, in an article in this issue, claims that CRISPR–Cas systems are mechanisms for the inheritance of acquired adaptive characteristics, and that the operation of such systems comprises a “Lamarckian mode of evolution.” We argue that viewing the CRISPR–Cas mechanism as facilitating a form of “directed mutation” more accurately represents how the system behaves and the history of neoDarwinian thinking, and is to be preferred.
KeywordsLamarckian Evolution CRISPR–Cas Directed mutation Mutationism
Funding was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant No. GLDSU447989).
- Gould SJ (1977) Ever since Darwin: reflections in natural history. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Phillips S, Edgell MH et al (1978) Mutagenesis at a specific position in a DNA sequence. J Biol Chem 253:6551–6560Google Scholar
- Nei M (2013) Mutation-driven evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar