Advertisement

Biology & Philosophy

, 34:10 | Cite as

When is it co-evolution? A reply to Steen and co-authors

  • Mark SagoffEmail author
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

David Steen and co-authors in this journal offer a philosophical argument to support an “Evolutionary Community Concept” to identify what they call “evolutionary communities.” They describe these as “unique collections of species that interact and have co-evolved in a given geographic area” and that include “co-evolved dependencies between different parts of a community.” Steen et al. refer to the coevolution of assemblages, collections, communities, dependencies, interspecific and abiotic interactions, and traits, but they do not define “co-evolution” or provide an example in which co-evolution (as distinct from interaction) has been demonstrated. There may be as many ways to explain interactions among species as these interactions themselves; they may result, for example, from ecological fitting and phenotypic plasticity. In this paper, I argue that standard Darwinian Theory explains intraspecific microevolution or descent with modification within an interbreeding and potentially continuous population. The power, mechanism, or force that causes interspecific co-evolution, especially at the community scale, requires further explanation.

Keywords

Philosophy of ecology Co-evolution Community ecology Natural theology 

Notes

References

  1. Agosta SJ, Klemens JA (2008) Ecological fitting by phenotypically flexible genotypes: implications for species associations, community assembly and evolution. Ecol Lett 11(11):1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allee WC, Park O, Emerson AE, Park T, Schmidt KP (1949) Principles of animal ecology (No. 591.5/A422). WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo SB, Braga MP, Brooks DR, Agosta SJ, Hoberg EP, von Hartenthal FW, Boeger WA (2015) Understanding host-switching by ecological fitting. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0139225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrows CW, Murphy-Mariscal ML, Hernandez RR (2016) At a crossroads: the nature of natural history in the twenty-first century. Bioscience 66(7):592–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnicksen TM (2000) America’s Ancient forest: from the ice age to the age of discovery. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmona D, Fitzpatrick CR, Johnson MT (2015) Fifty years of co-evolution and beyond: integrating co-evolution from molecules to species. Mol Ecol 24(21):5315–5329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll WC, Kapeluck PR, Harper RA, Van Lear DH (2002) Background paper: historical overview of the southern forest landscape and associated resources. In: Wear DN, Greis JG (eds) Southern forest resource assessment. USDA Forest Service GTR SRS-53, Asheville, pp 583–606Google Scholar
  8. Clewell AF (1989) Natural history of wiregrass (Aristida strida Michx., Gramineae). Nat Areas J 9:223–233Google Scholar
  9. Collier J (2000) Autonomy and process closure as the basis for functionality. Ann N Y Acad Sci 901(1):280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croker RA (2001) Stephen Forbes and the rise of American ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Curtin CG, Parker JP (2014) Foundations of resilience thinking. Conserv Biol 28(4):912–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dice L (1952) Natural communities. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donhauser J (2018) Informative ecological models without ecological forces. Synthese.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1859-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dussault AC, Bouchard F (2017) A persistence enhancing propensity account of ecological function to explain ecosystem evolution. Synthese 194(4):1115–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18(4):586–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forbes SA (1880) On some interactions of organisms. Bull Ill State Lab Nat Hist I:3–17Google Scholar
  19. Forbes SA (1925 [1887]) The lake as a microcosm. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull 015(09)Google Scholar
  20. Futuyma DJ (2013) The evolution of evolutionary ecology. Isr J Ecol Evolut 59(4):172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ginzburg L, Colyvan M (2004) Ecological orbits: how planets move and populations grow. Oxford University Press on Demand, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Gleason HA (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 53(1):7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gleason HA (1927) Further views on the succession concept. Ecology 8:299–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleason HA (1939) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Am Midl Nat 21(1):92–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gould SJ (1998) An evolutionary perspective on strengths, fallacies, and confusions in the concept of native plants. Arnoldia 58(1):3–10Google Scholar
  26. Grant PR, Grant BR (1995) Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49:241–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greene HW, Losos JB (1988) Systematics, natural history, and conservation: field biologists must fight a public-image problem. Bioscience 38:458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grimm V (1998) To be, or to be essentially the same: the self-identity of ecological units’. Trends Ecol Evol 13(8):298–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gunderson LH, Allen CR, Holling CS (eds) (2012) Foundations of ecological resilience. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Haila Y, Taylor P (2001) The philosophical dullness of classical ecology, and a Levinsian alternative. Biol Philos 16(1):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hembry DH, Yoder JB, Goodman KR (2014) Coevolution and the diversification of life. Am Nat 184(4):425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Herrera CM (1988) Habitat-shaping, host plant use by a hemiparasitic shrub, and the importance of gut fellows. Oikos 51:383–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze PC (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 31–44Google Scholar
  35. Janz N (2011) Ehrlich and Raven revisited: mechanisms underlying codiversification of plants and enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Janzen DH (1985) On ecological fitting. Oikos 45(3):308–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Janzen DH, Hallwachs W (2016) Biodiversity conservation history and future in Costa Rica: the case of Área de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG), Ch. 10. In: Kappelle M (ed) Costa Rican ecosystems. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  38. Janzen DH, Martin PS (1982) Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215(4528):19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jax K (2006) Ecological units: definitions and application. Q Rev Biol 81(3):237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jax K, Jones CG, Pickett STA (1998) The self-identity of ecological units. Oikos 82:253–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jermy T (1984) Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. Am Nat 124(5):609–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson MTJ, Stinchcombe JR (2007) An emerging synthesis between community ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 22:250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kettlewell HBD (1973) The evolution of melanism. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Kingsland SE (1994) Essay review: the history of ecology. J Hist Biol 27(2):349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kitcher P (2000) Patterns of scientific controversies. In: Machamer P (ed) Scientific controversies: philosophical and historical perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 21–39Google Scholar
  46. Levin SA (1981) The role of theoretical ecology in the description and understanding of populations in heterogeneous environments. Am Zool 21:865–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levins R, Lewontin R (1985) The dialectical biologist. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Lovejoy AO (1959) The great chain of being. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Maynard-Smith J (1964) Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201(4924):1145–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. McIntosh RP (1980) The background and some current problems of theoretical ecology. Synthese 43(2):195–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McPeek MA (2017a) Evolutionary community ecology, vol 58. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McPeek MA (2017b) The ecological dynamics of natural selection: traits and the coevolution of community structure. Am Nat 189(5):E91–E117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Means BD (2006) Vertebrate faunal diversity of longleaf pine ecosystems. In: Jose S, Jokela E, Miller DL (eds) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York, pp 157–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Noss RF (1996) The naturalists are dying off. Conserv Biol 10:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nylin S, Agosta S, Bensch S, Boeger WA, Braga MP, Brooks DR, Schäpers A (2018) Embracing colonizations: a new paradigm for species association dynamics. Trends Ecol Evolut 33(1):4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Odum EP (1992) Great ideas in ecology for the 1990’s. Bioscience 42:542–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paley W (1810 [1802]) The works of William Paley, DD: Natural theology, vol 1. Joshua BelcherGoogle Scholar
  59. Patten BC (1975) Ecosystem as a co-evolutionary unit: a theme for teaching systems ecology. In: Innis GS (ed) New directions in the analysis of ecological systems. Part 1. Society for Computer Simulation, La Jolla, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  60. Phillips D (2003) The truth of ecology: nature, culture, and literature in America. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pimm SL (1991) The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  62. Pyle RM (2001) The rise and fall of natural history: how a science grew that eclipsed direct experience. Orion 20:16–23Google Scholar
  63. Pyne SJ, Andrews PL, Laven RD (1996) Introduction to wildland fire, 2nd edn. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
  64. Quine W (1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Rodriguez RA, Herrera AM, Santander J, Miranda JV, Perdomo ME, Quirós Á, Riera R, Fath BD (2016) From a stationary to a non-stationary ecological state equation: adding a tool for ecological monitoring. Ecol Model 320:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Salt GW (1983) Roles: their limits and responsibilities in ecological and evolutionary research. Am Nat 122(5):697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sherbakov DY, Kovalenkova MV, Maikova OO (2016) Recent results of molecular-phylogenetic studies of endemic invertebrates inhabiting Lake Baikal. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genetiki i Selektsii Vavilov J Genet Breed 20(4):403–407Google Scholar
  68. Silver B (1978) William Bartram’s and other eighteenth-century accounts of nature. J Hist Ideas 39(4):597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simberloff D (1980) A succession of paradigms in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese 43(1):3–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simberloff D (1983) Competition theory, hypothesis-testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. Am Nat 122(5):626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simberloff D (2004) Community ecology: is it time to move on? (An American Society of Naturalists Presidential Address). Am Nat 163(6):787–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simberloff D (2010) Invasions of plant communities—more of the same, something very different, or both? Am Midl Nat 163(1):220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Snaydon RW (1970) Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic populations to soils. Evolution 24:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sober E (1984) The nature of selection: evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Soulé ME (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35(11):727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stearns SC (1983) The genetic basis of differences in life-history traits among six populations of mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) that shared ancestors in 1905. Evolution 37:618–627Google Scholar
  77. Steen DA, Barrett K, Clarke E, Guyer C (2017) Conceptualizing communities as natural entities: a philosophical argument with basic and applied implications. Biol Philos 32:1019–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sterelny K (1995) Understanding life: recent work in philosophy of biology. Br J Philos Sci 46(2):155–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Suchan T, Alvarez N (2015) Fifty years after Ehrlich and Raven, is there support for plant–insect coevolution as a major driver of species diversification? Entomol Exp Appl 157(1):98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tewksbury JJ et al (2014) Natural history’s place in science and society. Bioscience 64:300–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turcotte MM, Levine JM (2016) Phenotypic plasticity and species coexistence. Trends Ecol Evol 31(10):803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Van Lear DH, Carroll WD, Kapeluck PR, Johnson R (2005) History and restoration of the longleaf pine-grassland ecosystem: implications for species at risk. For Ecol Manag 211(1–2):150–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Webb SD (1974) Chronology of Florida Pleistocene mammals. In: Webb SD (ed) Pleistocene mammals of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, pp 5–31Google Scholar
  84. Webb SD (1977) A history of savanna vertebrates in the New World. Part I: North America. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:355–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33(1):475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. White TCR (2013) Experimental and observational evidence reveals that predators in natural environments do not regulate their prey: they are passengers, not drivers. Acta Oecol 53:73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Whittaker RH (1975) Communities and ecosystems, 2nd edn. Macmillan, Collier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  88. Wilcove DS, Eisner TS (2000) The impending extinction of natural history. Chron High Educ 47(3):B24Google Scholar
  89. Wilkinson DM (2004) The parable of Green Mountain: ascension Island, ecosystem construction and ecological fitting. J Biogeogr 31:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection: a critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilson DS, Sober E (1989) Reviving the superorganism. J Theor Biol 136(3):337–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zamora R (2000) Functional equivalence in plant-animal interactions: ecological and evolutionary consequences. Oikos 88(2):442–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Philosophy and Public PolicyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations