Advertisement

Carbon dioxide fluxes of air-exposed sediments and desiccating ponds

  • Kenneth Thorø MartinsenEmail author
  • Theis Kragh
  • Kaj Sand-Jensen
Article

Abstract

Ponds are active components of the global carbon cycle processing and emitting carbon dioxide and methane to the atmosphere. These common habitats frequently experience seasonal water table variations resulting in periodically air-exposed sediments. However, the influence of these events on both the system scale carbon balance and in-pond environmental conditions remains poorly studied. We took advantage of an extraordinarily warm and dry summer to quantify the CO2 efflux from air-exposed sediments and water surfaces in desiccating ponds on Öland, Sweden. Simultaneously, we modelled metabolism and measured environmental variables within the ponds. We found that air-exposed sediments had high CO2 effluxes greatly exceeding that from the water surfaces. Sediment water content influenced the temperature and strongly regulated the CO2 efflux gradually approaching zero as water evaporated. Within the desiccating ponds, respiration was generally higher than gross primary production, but was lower compared to the same ponds with higher water table. These findings highlight the role of periodically air-exposed pond sediments as sites of highly active carbon processes. Not only is this important for the system-scale carbon in ponds, but it may also influence the destiny of buried carbon in lakes subject to climate changes. The environmental conditions within desiccating ponds, most notably high water temperatures and poor oxygen conditions, further iterate the dynamics and extreme nature of ponds.

Keywords

Ponds Air-exposed sediments CO2 efflux Ecosystem metabolism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for grant support from COWIfonden and the Carlsberg Foundation (CF14-0136) to Kaj Sand-Jensen to the study of environmental and biological dynamics in ponds. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which helped improve the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10533_2019_579_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (113 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 113 kb)

References

  1. Abril G et al (2015) Large overestimation of pCO2 calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters. Biogeosciences 12:67–78.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-67-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen MR, Kragh T, Sand-Jensen K (2017a) Extreme diel oxygen and carbon cycles in shallow vegetated lakes. Proc R Soc B 284:20171427.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen MR, Sand-Jensen K, Iestyn Woolway R, Jones ID (2017b) Profound daily vertical stratification and mixing in a small, shallow, wind-exposed lake with submerged macrophytes. Aquat Sci 79:395–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-016-0505-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen MR, Kragh T, Martinsen KT, Kristensen E, Sand-Jensen K (2019) The carbon pump supports high primary production in a shallow lake Aquat Sci 81:24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-019-0622-7 Google Scholar
  5. Baastrup-Spohr L, Kragh T, Petersen K, Moeslund B, Schou JC, Sand-Jensen K (2016a) Remarkable richness of aquatic macrophytes in 3-years old re-established Lake Fil. Denmark Ecol Eng 95:375–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baastrup-Spohr L, Møller CL, Sand-Jensen K (2016b) Water-level fluctuations affect sediment properties, carbon flux and growth of the isoetid Littorella uniflora in oligotrophic lakes. Freshw Biol 61:301–315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barko JW, Smart RM (1986) Sediment-related mechanisms of growth limitation in submersed macrophytes. Ecology 67:1328–1340.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1938689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barton K (2018) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R package version 1.40.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  9. Bastviken D, Sundgren I, Natchimuthu S, Reyier H, Gålfalk M (2015) Technical Note: cost-efficient approaches to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and concentrations in terrestrial and aquatic environments using mini loggers. Biogeosciences 12:3849–3859.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-3849-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof JP (2008) Climate Change and Water. Technical Paper of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC Secretariat, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  11. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme. J Stat Software 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Batt RD, Carpenter SR (2012) Free-water lake metabolism: addressing noisy time series with a Kalman filter. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 10:20–30.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2012.10.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Biggs J, von Fumetti S, Kelly-Quinn M (2017) The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for policy makers. Hydrobiologia 793:3–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-3007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brothers S, Kazanjian G, Köhler J, Scharfenberger U, Hilt S (2017) Convective mixing and high littoral production established systematic errors in the diel oxygen curves of a shallow, eutrophic lake. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 15:429–435.  https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Casselman JM, Lewis CA (1996) Habitat requirements of northern pike (Essox lucius). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:161–174.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f96-019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Catalán N, von Schiller D, Marcé R, Koschorreck M, Gomez-Gener L, Obrador B (2014) Carbon dioxide efflux during the flooding phase of temporary ponds. Limnetica 33:349–360Google Scholar
  19. Cavalcanti JR, da Motta-Marques D, Fragoso CR Jr (2016) Process-based modeling of shallow lake metabolism: spatio-temporal variability and relative importance of individual processes. Ecol Model 323:28–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Christensen J, Sand-Jensen K, Staehr PA (2013) Fluctuating water levels control water chemistry and metabolism of a charophyte-dominated pond. Freshw Biol 58:1353–1365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cole JJ et al (2007) Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10:172–185.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downing J et al (2006) The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2388–2397.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Downing JA et al (2008) Sediment organic carbon burial in agriculturally eutrophic impoundments over the last century. Global Biogeochem Cycles 22:1.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002854 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dv Schiller, Marce R, Obrador B, Gomez-Gener L, Casas-Ruiz JP, Acuna V, Koschorreck M (2014) Carbon dioxide emissions from dry watercourses. Inland waters 4:377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fromin N, Pinay G, Montuelle B, Landais D, Ourcival J, Joffre R, Lensi R (2010) Impact of seasonal sediment desiccation and rewetting on microbial processes involved in greenhouse gas emissions. Ecohydrology 3:339–348.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallo EL, Lohse KA, Ferlin CM, Meixner T, Brooks PD (2014) Physical and biological controls on trace gas fluxes in semi-arid urban ephemeral waterways. Biogeochemistry 121:189–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9927-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilbert PJ, Cooke DA, Deary M, Taylor S, Jeffries MJ (2017) Quantifying rapid spatial and temporal variations of CO2 fluxes from small, lowland freshwater ponds. Hydrobiologia 793:83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2855-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gómez-Gener L et al (2015) Hot spots for carbon emissions from Mediterranean fluvial networks during summer drought. Biogeochemistry 125:409–426.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0139-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gómez-Gener L et al (2016) When water vanishes: magnitude and regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from dry temporary streams. Ecosystems 19:710–723.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-9963-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gran G (1952) Determination of the equivalence point in potentiometric titrations. Part II. Analyst 77:661–671.  https://doi.org/10.1039/an9527700661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffiths RA (1997) Temporary ponds as amphibian habitats. Aquat Conserv 7:119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grinham A et al (2018) The importance of small artificial water bodies as sources of methane emissions in Queensland, Australia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:5281–5298.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hecnar SJ, M’Closkey RT (1997) The effects of predatory fish on amphibian species richness and distribution. Biol Conserv 79:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00113-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holgerson MA, Raymond PA (2016) Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds. Nat Geosci 9:222–226.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2654 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jassby AD, Platt T (1976) Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 21:540–547.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1976.21.4.0540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jin H, Yoon TK, Lee S-H, Kang H, Im J, Park J-H (2016) Enhanced greenhouse gas emission from exposed sediments along a hydroelectric reservoir during an extreme drought event. Environ Res Lett 11:124003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jørgensen SE, Bendoricchio G (2001) Developments in environmental modelling. In: Jørgensen SE, Bendoricchio G (eds) Fundamentals of ecological modelling. vol 21. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Koschorreck M (2000) Methane turnover in exposed sediments of an Amazon floodplain lake. Biogeochemistry 50:195–206.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006326018597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kosten S et al (2018) Extreme drought boosts CO2 and CH4 emissions from reservoir drawdown areas. Inland Waters 8:329–340.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2018.1483126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kragh T, Andersen MR, Sand-Jensen K (2017) Profound afternoon depression of ecosystem production and nighttime decline of respiration in a macrophyte-rich, shallow lake. Oecologia 185:157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3931-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leon E, Vargas R, Bullock S, Lopez E, Panosso AR, La Scala N (2014) Hot spots, hot moments, and spatio-temporal controls on soil CO2 efflux in a water-limited ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 77:12–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lloyd J, Taylor J (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2389824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marcé R et al (2019) Emissions from dry inland waters are a blind spot in the global carbon cycle Earth-Sci Rev 188:240–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.11.012 Google Scholar
  44. Martinsen KT, Andersen MR, Kragh T, Sand-Jensen K (2017) High rates and close diel coupling of primary production and ecosystem respiration in small, oligotrophic lakes. Aquat Sci 79:995–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-017-0550-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martinsen KT, Kragh T, Sand-Jensen K (2018) Technical note: a simple and cost-efficient automated floating chamber for continuous measurements of carbon dioxide gas flux on lakes. Biogeosciences 15:5565–5573.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5565-2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martinsen KT, Andersen MR, Sand-Jensen K (2019) Water temperature dynamics and the prevalence of daytime stratification in small temperate shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia 826:247–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3737-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mendonça R, Müller RA, Clow D, Verpoorter C, Raymond P, Tranvik LJ, Sobek S (2017) Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat Commun 8:1694.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01789-6 Google Scholar
  48. Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) A review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391:202–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Obrador B, von Schiller D, Marcé R, Gómez-Gener L, Koschorreck M, Borrego C, Catalán N (2018) Dry habitats sustain high CO2 emissions from temporary ponds across seasons. Sci Rep 8:3015.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20969-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pekel J-F, Cottam A, Gorelick N, Belward AS (2016) High-resolution mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes. Nature 540:418–422.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prairie YT et al (2018) Greenhouse gas emissions from freshwater reservoirs: what does the atmosphere see? Ecosystems 21:1058–1071.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-017-0198-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  54. Raat AJ (1988) Synopsis of biological data on the northern pike: Esox lucius Linnaeus, 1758. FAO Fish. Synop., (30) Rev. 2Google Scholar
  55. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus B 44:81–99.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.1992.t01-1-00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Raymond PA et al (2013) Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503:355–359.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Read JS et al (2011) Derivation of lake mixing and stratification indices from high-resolution lake buoy data. Environ Model Software 26:1325–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sand-Jensen K, Møller CL (2014) Reduced root anchorage of freshwater plants in sandy sediments enriched with fine organic matter. Freshw Biol 59:427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen MF, Nielsen SL (1992) Photosynthetic use of inorganic carbon among primary and secondary water plants in streams. Freshw Biol 27:283–293.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sand-Jensen K, Pedersen NL, Søndergaard M (2007) Bacterial metabolism in small temperate streams under contemporary and future climates. Freshw Biol 52:2340–2353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sand-Jensen K, Baastrup-Spohr L, Christensen JP, Alnoee AB, Andersen MR, Jespersen TS, Riis T, Bruun HH (2015) Mellan torka och översvämning på Öland. [Caught between draught and flooding on Öland’s Great Alvar.] Svensk Bot Tidskr 109:28–35Google Scholar
  62. Sand-Jensen K et al (2018) Photosynthesis and calcification of charophytes. Aquat Bot 149:46–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2018.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Skinner D, Oliver R, Aldridge K, Brookes J (2014) Extreme water level decline effects sediment distribution and composition in Lake Alexandrina, South Australia. Limnology 15:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-013-0422-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. SMHI (2018) Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute. http://www.smhi.se/klimatdata. Accessed February 2019
  65. Solomon CT et al (2013) Ecosystem respiration: drivers of daily variability and background respiration in lakes around the globe. Limnol Oceanogr 58:849–866.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.3.0849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Staehr PA et al (2010) Lake metabolism and the diel oxygen technique: state of the science. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 8:628–644.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2010.8.0628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor S, Gilbert PJ, Cooke DA, Deary ME, Jeffries MJ (2019) High carbon burial rates by small ponds in the landscape. Front Ecol Environ 17:25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1988 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tranvik LJ et al (2009) Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2298–2314.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vargas R, Sánchez-Cañete PE, Serrano-Ortiz P, Curiel Yuste J, Domingo F, López-Ballesteros A, Oyonarte C (2018) Hot-moments of Soil CO2 efflux in a water-limited grassland. Soil Systems 2:47.  https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems2030047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verpoorter C, Kutser T, Seekell DA, Tranvik LJ (2014) A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys Res Lett 41:6396–6402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl060641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wantzen KM, Rothhaupt K-O, Mörtl M, Cantonati M, László G, Fischer P (2008) Ecological effects of water-level fluctuations in lakes: an urgent issue. Hydrobiologia 613:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9192-6_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weise L et al (2016) Water level changes affect carbon turnover and microbial community composition in lake sediments FEMS. Microbiol Ecol 92:fiw035.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weyhenmeyer GA, Kortelainen P, Sobek S, Müller R, Rantakari M (2012) Carbon dioxide in boreal surface waters: a comparison of lakes and streams. Ecosystems 15:1295–1307.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9585-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams DD (1997) Temporary ponds and their invertebrate communities. Aquat Conserv 7:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams P, Whitfield M, Biggs J, Bray S, Fox G, Nicolet P, Sear D (2004) Comparative biodiversity of rivers, streams, ditches and ponds in an agricultural landscape in Southern England. Biol Conserv 115:329–341.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(03)00153-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freshwater Biological LaboratoryBiological Institute, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations