Advertisement

Invoking denialism does not strengthen invasion science

  • Greg R. GuerinEmail author
Letter to the Editor
  • 39 Downloads

To the Editor,

Kuebbing and Nuñez (2018) defend their meta-analysis of the impacts of non-native plant species on native biodiversity (Kuebbing and Nuñez 2016), one of the articles explored as examples of selection bias in a cautionary article about generalising impacts across species (Guerin et al. 2018). However, Kuebbing and Nuñez (2018) rebut statements that were never made, yet fail to address key points or take into account recent movement in the literature when they conclude that generalisation of negative impacts across non-native species is supported.

Guerin et al. (2018) recognised that non-native species can have significant individual and cumulative impacts (Boltovskoy et al. 2018). Guerin et al. (2018) offered no objection to managers and scientists focusing on problematic species, since understanding and effective control is clearly needed in those cases. Our case focused on the risk of generalising from a biased set of problematic training species to many potentially...

Notes

References

  1. Boltovskoy D, Sylvester F, Paolucci EM (2018) Invasive species denialism: sorting out facts, beliefs, and definitions. Ecol Evol 8:11190–11198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis MA, Chew MK (2017) ‘The denialists are coming!’Well, not exactly: a response to Russell and Blackburn. Tree 32:229–230Google Scholar
  3. Guerin GR, Martín-Forés I, Sparrow B et al (2018) The biodiversity impacts of non-native species should not be extrapolated from biased single-species studies. Biodivers Conserv 27:785–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kuebbing E, Nuñez MA (2016) Invasive non-native plants have a greater effect on neighbouring natives than other non-natives. Nat Plants 2:16134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuebbing E, Nuñez MA (2018) Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings. Biodivers Conserv 27:1545–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcantonio M, Rocchini D, Ottaviani G (2014) Impact of alien species on dune systems: a multifaceted approach. Biodivers Conserv 23:2645–2668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martín-Forés I, Castro I, Acosta-Gallo B, del Pozo A, Sánchez-Jardón L et al (2016) Alien plant species coexist over time with native ones in Chilean Mediterranean grasslands. J Plan Ecol 9:682–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Martín-Forés I, Guerin GR, Lowe AJ (2017) Weed abundance is positively correlated with native plant diversity in grasslands of southern Australia. PLoS ONE 12:e0178681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Peng S, Kinlock NL, Gurevitch J, Peng S (2019) Correlation of native and exotic species richness: a global meta-analysis finds no invasion paradox across scales. Ecology 100:e02552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richardson DM, Ricciardi A (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Divers Distrib 19:1461–1467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sax DF (2002) Native and naturalized plant diversity are positively correlated in scrub communities of California and Chile. Divers Distrib 8:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations