Avoiding tailings dam collapses requires governance, partnership and responsibility

  • Fernando A. O. SilveiraEmail author
  • Evandro M. Gama
  • Kingsley W. Dixon
  • Adam T. Cross
Letter to the Editor

On November 5th, 2015, 50 million m3 of mining tailings were spilled after a dam collapse in Mariana, south-eastern Brazil. The toxic waste destroyed the entire village of Bento Rodrigues, killed 19 people, and compromised the livelihood and welfare of hundreds more people living in the Doce River watershed (Escobar 2015). Eventually, the tailings reached the Atlantic Ocean, leaving in their wake a trail of sterilised aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (Queiroz et al. 2018). After a tragedy of such immense scale, National and State congressmen proposed more rigorous legislation to prevent further tailings storage facility failures. However, on January 25th, 2019, another dam collapsed at the Córrego do Feijão Mine near Brumadinho. Another 12 million m3of tailings was spilled, this time in the Paraopeba watershed. Although a smaller amount of toxic waste was released, the human tragedy is set to eclipse that of the Mariana tragedy: so far 212 people have lost their lives, and nearly...



  1. Callisto M, Gonçalves JF, Ligeiro R (2016) Water resources in the rupestrian grasslands of the Espinhaço Range. In: Fernandes GW (ed) Ecology and conservation of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cross AT, Stevens JC, Dixon KW (2017) One giant leap for mankind: can ecopoiesis avert mine tailings disasters? Plant Soil 421:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Escobar H (2015) Mud tsunami wreaks ecological havoc in Brazil. Science 350:1138–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gama E (2019) Os coprodutos da mineração de ferro para uma economia sustentável. Novas Edições AcadêmicasGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobi CM, Carmo FF, Vincent RC, Stehmann JR (2007) Plant communities on ironstone outcrops: a diverse and endangered Brazilian ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 16:2185–2200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McDonald T, Gann GD, Jonson J, Dixon KW (2016) International standards for the practice of ecological restoration-including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Meira RMSA, Peixoto AL, Coelho MAN, Ponzo APL, Esteves VGL, Silva MC, Câmara PEAS, Meira-Neto JAA (2016) Brazil’s mining code under attack: giant mining companies impose unprecedented risk to biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 25:407–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Myers et al (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pena JCC, Goulart F, Fernandes GW, Hoffmann D, Leite FSF, Santos NB, Soares-Filho B, Sobral-Souza T, Vancine MH, Rodrigues M (2017) Impacts of mining activities on the potential geographic distribution of eastern Brazil mountaintop endemic species. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:172–178Google Scholar
  10. Queiroz HM, Nóbrega GN, Ferreira TO, Almeida LS, Romero TB, Santaella ST, Bernardino AF, Otero XL (2018) The Samarco mine tailing disaster: a possible time-bomb for heavy metals contamination? Sci Total Environ 637–638:498–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Salles DM, Carmo FF, Jacobi CM (2018) Habitat loss challenges the conservation of endemic plants in mining-targeted Brazilian mountains. Environ Conserv 46:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando A. O. Silveira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Evandro M. Gama
    • 2
  • Kingsley W. Dixon
    • 3
  • Adam T. Cross
    • 3
  1. 1.Departamento de BotânicaUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Engenharia de MinasUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.School of Molecular and Life SciencesCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations