Advertisement

Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 953–973 | Cite as

When good animals love restored habitat in bad neighborhoods: ecological traps for eastern cottontails in agricultural landscapes

  • Julia A. Nawrocki
  • Robert L. SchooleyEmail author
  • Michael P. Ward
Original Paper
First Online:
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Large-scale restoration programs have been implemented worldwide to counteract habitat loss and fragmentation from expansion and intensification of agriculture. These agri-environment programs create habitat patches imbedded in an agricultural matrix. The assumption is these patches benefit wildlife and that individuals either avoid agricultural fields or use them to increase their fitness. We selected eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) as a focal species on restored grasslands in Illinois, USA to assess survival and to determine if maladaptive habitat selection for agricultural fields could create an ecological trap. We also investigated whether a mismatch between real and perceived predation risk could explain their habitat selection. We radiotracked 95 cottontails and estimated habitat-specific survival using known-fate models, and measured habitat selection using Manly’s standardized selection ratios. We also assessed perceived predation risk with giving-up density experiments. Survival of cottontails was higher in restored grasslands relative to agricultural and developed areas. Habitat selection did not reflect this spatial variation in mortality risk, however, when crops were present on the landscape. Agricultural lands created an equal-preference trap. Cottontails did not accurately assess predation risk; they did not recognize that agricultural fields were risky. This mismatch could be due to cottontails’ emphasis on protecting themselves from avian predators rather than from coyotes (Canis latrans), which currently are their main predator. Our novel study demonstrates how dynamic landscape context can create ecological traps. Such unexpected outcomes can reduce the conservation benefits of restoration programs.

Keywords

Agroecosystem Ecological trap Predation risk Restoration Survival Sylvilagus floridanus 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program) through the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. We thank S. Beyer, S. Chow, C. Dempsey, and L. Kelter for field assistance, C. Miller for providing cottontail trend data, and B. Berry for collecting the camera trap data. We are grateful to T. J. Benson, A. Ahlers, T. Lyons, and M. Whitby for help with statistical analysis. E. Heske, B. Robertson, and anonymous reviewer provided helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10531_2019_1704_MOESM1_ESM.docx (92 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 90 kb)

References

  1. Abu Baker MA, Brown JS (2009) Patch area, substrate depth, and richness affect giving-up densities: a test with mourning doves and cottontail rabbits. Oikos 118:1721–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu Baker MA, Emerson SE, Brown JS (2015) Foraging and habitat use of eastern cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus) in an urban landscape. Urban Ecosyst 18:977–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althoff DP (1983) Daytime home range, habitat selection, and microenvironments used by cottontail rabbits in central Pennsylvania. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  4. Althoff DP, Storm GL, Dewalle DR (1997) Daytime habitat selection by cottontails in central Pennsylvania. J Wildl Manage 61:450–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arias-Del Razo I, Hernández L, Laundré JW, Myers O (2011) Do predator and prey foraging activity patterns match? A study of coyotes (Canis latrans), and lagomorphs (Lepus californicus and Sylvilagus audobonii). J Arid Environ 75:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manage 74:1175–1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthur SM, Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Garner GW (1996) Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18:1482–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baundry J, Burel F, Aviron S, Martin M, Ouin A, Pain G, Thenail C (2003) Temporal variability of connectivity in agricultural landscapes: do farming activities help? Landsc Ecol 18:303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bedoya-Perez MA, Carthey AJR, Mella VSA et al (2013) A practical guide to avoid giving up on giving-up densities. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1541–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell SS, Fonseca MS, Moten LB (1997) Linking restoration and landscape ecology. Restor Ecol 5:318–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry WB, Schooley RL, Ward MP (2017) Landscape context affects use of restored grasslands by mammals in a dynamic agroecosystem. Am Midl Nat 177:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boland KM, Litvaitis JA (2008) Role of predation and hunting on eastern cottontail mortality at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts. Can J Zool 86:918–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bond BT, Burger LW, Leopold BD, Godwin KD (2001a) Survival of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Mississippi and an examination of latitudinal variation. Am Midl Nat 145:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bond BT, Leopold BD, Burger LW, Godwin KD (2001b) Movements and home range dynamics of cottontail rabbits in Mississippi. J Wildl Manage 65:1004–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brillhart DE, Kaufman DW (1995) Spatial and seasonal variation in prey use by coyotes in north-central Kansas. Southwest Nat 40:160–166Google Scholar
  18. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG et al (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 16:909–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown JS (1988) Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown JS, Alkon PU (1990) Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches. Oecologia 83:512–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brudvig LA (2011) The restoration of biodiversity: where has research been and where does it need to go? Am J Bot 98:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Calenge C (2006) The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Celis-Murillo A, Stodola KW, Pappadopoli B, Burton JM, Ward MP (2016) Seasonal and daily patterns of nocturnal singing in the field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). J Ornithol 157:853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chapman JA, Hockma JG, Edwards WR (1982) Cottontails (Sylvilagus floridanus and allies). In: Chapman JA, Feldhammer GA (eds) Wild mammals of North America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 83–123Google Scholar
  26. Concepción ED, Díaz M, Baquero RA (2008) Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landsc Ecol 23:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cosentino BJ, Schooley RL, Phillips CA (2011) Connectivity of agroecosystems: dispersal costs can vary among crops. Landsc Ecol 26:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cox EW, Garrott RA, Cary JR (1997) Effect of supplemental cover on survival of snowshoe hares and cottontail rabbits in patchy habitat. Can J Zool 75:1357–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crawford JC, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM (2018) Survival and habitat use of sympatric lagomorphs in bottomland hardwood forests. Can J Zool 96:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Deppe JL, Ward MP, Bolus RT et al (2015) Fat, weather, and date affect migratory songbirds’ departure decisions, routes, and time it takes to cross the Gulf of Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:E6331–E6338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Donald PF, Evans AD (2006) Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes. J Appl Ecol 43:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Duggan JM, Heske EJ, Schooley RL (2012) Gap-crossing decisions by adult Franklin’s ground squirrels in agricultural landscapes. J Mammal 93:1231–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dusi JL (1952) The food habits of several populations of cottontail rabbits in Ohio. J Wildl Manage 16:180–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Duvick DN, Cassman KG (1999) Post-green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Sci 39:1622–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Elbroch LM, Lendrum PE, Alexander P, Quigley H (2015) Cougar den site selection in the Southern Yellowstone Ecosystem. Mamm Res 60:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ellis EC, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:589–606Google Scholar
  38. Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L et al (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ferris J, Siikamaki J (2009) Conservation reserve program and wetland reserve program: primary land retirement programs for promoting farmland conservation. Resources For the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Fritsky RS (2006) Effects of the conservation reserve enhancement program on abundance and survival of Eastern Cottontails in Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania State University, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  41. Gosselink TE, Van Deelen TR, Warner RE, Joselyn MG (2003) Temporal habitat partitioning and spatial use of coyotes and red foxes in east-central Illinois. J Wildl Manage 67:90–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffin PC, Mills SL (2009) Sinks without borders: snowshoe hare dynamics in a complex landscape. Oikos 118:1487–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hale R, Swearer SE (2016) Ecological traps: current evidence and future directions. Proc R Soc B 283:20152647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hale R, Swearer SE (2017) When good animals love bad restored habitat: how maladaptive habitat selection can constrain restoration. J Appl Ecol 54:1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Henke SE, Bryant FC (1999) Effects of coyote removal on the faunal community in western Texas. J Wildl Manage 63:1066–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heske E, Miller M (1995) Coyotes in the corn-fields. Ill Nat Hist Surv Rep 334:1Google Scholar
  47. Hiron M, Berg Å, Pärt T (2012) Do skylarks prefer autumn sown cereals? Effects of agricultural land use, region and time in the breeding season on density. Agric Ecosyst Environ 150:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Humberg LA, Devault TL, Macgowan BJ, Beasley JC, Rhodes OE (2007) Crop depredation by wildlife in northcentral Indiana. In: Stewart A (ed) Proceedings of the national wild turkey symposium. pp 199–205Google Scholar
  51. Huntly N (1991) Herbivores and the dynamics of communities and ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:477–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Illinois State Geological Survey, Illinois Natural Resources Geospatial Data Clearinghouse. 2015. NAIP Digital Orthophoto Quadrangle Data. https://clearinghouse.isgs.illinois.edu/data/imagery/2015-illinois-naip-digital-orthophoto-quadrangle-data. Accessed Feb 2017
  53. Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keith LB, Bloomer SEM (1993) Differential mortality of sympatric snowshoe hares and cottontail rabbits in central Wisconsin. Can J Zool 71:1694–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kleijn D, Sutherland WJ (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? J Appl Ecol 40:947–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Korschgen LJ (1957) Food habits of the coyote in Missouri. J Wildl Manage 21:424–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Korschgen LJ (1980) Food and nutrition of cottontail rabbits in Missouri. Mo Dept Conserv Terr Ser 6:1–16Google Scholar
  58. Kovach WL (2009) Oriana—circular statistics for windows, version 3. Kovach Computing Services, PentraethGoogle Scholar
  59. Kuussaari M, Bommarco R, Heikkinen RK et al (2009) Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 24:564–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Laundré JW, Calderas JMM, Hernández L (2009) Foraging in the landscape of fear, the predator’s dilemma: where should I hunt? Open Ecol J 2:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laundré JW, Hernández L, Ripple WJ (2010) The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. Open Ecol J 3:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Longland WS (1991) Risk of predation and food consumption by black-tailed jackrabbits. J Range Manage 44:447–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lord RD (1963) The cottontail rabbit in Illinois. Ill Dept Conserv Tech Bull 3:1–94Google Scholar
  64. MacCracken J, Hansen R (1987) Coyote feeding strategies in southeastern Idaho: optimal foraging by an opportunistic predator? J Wildl Manage 51:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mankin PC, Warner RE (1999a) Responses of eastern cottontails to intensive row-crop farming. J Mamm 80:940–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mankin PC, Warner RE (1999b) A regional model of the eastern cottontail and land-use changes in Illinois. J Wildl Manage 63:956–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  68. Marsden HM, Holler NR (1964) Social behavior in confined populations of the cottontail and the swamp rabbit. Wildl Monogr 27:938–942Google Scholar
  69. Medve KA (1987) Eastern cottontail habitat use and survival in southern Illinois. Dissertation, Southern Illinois UniversityGoogle Scholar
  70. Menz MHM, Dixon KW, Hobbs RJ (2013) Hurdles and opportunities for landscape-scale restoration. Science 339:526–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mulligan MP, Schooley RL, Ward MP (2013) Effects of connectivity and regional dynamics on restoration of small mammal communities in midwestern grasslands. Restor Ecol 21:678–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nawrocki JA (2017) Dangerous misperceptions with consequences: survival of eastern cottontails on restored grasslands surrounded by agriculture. Thesis, University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  73. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL et al (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nisi AC, Hernandez DL, English LP, Rogers ES (2015) Patterns of selective herbivory on five prairie legume species. Am Midl Nat 173:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. NOAA National Weather Service Forecast Office (2017) Annual Climate Report. http://w2.weather.gov/climate/index.php?wfo=ilx. Accessed March 2017
  76. Noon BR (1981) Techniques for sampling avian habitats. In: Capen DE (ed) The use of multivariate statistics in studies of wildlife habitat. USDA For Ser Gen Tech Rep RM-57Google Scholar
  77. Northrup JM, Stenhouse GB, Boyce MS (2012) Agricultural lands as ecological traps for grizzly bears. Anim Conserv 15:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Petersen L (1979) Ecology of great horned owls and red-tailed hawks in southeastern Wisconsin. Tech Bull Dept Nat Res Wis 111:1–63Google Scholar
  79. Randa LA, Cooper DM, Meserve PL, Yunger JA (2009) Prey switching of sympatric canids in response to variable prey abundance. J Mamm 90:594–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Robertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87:1075–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Santangeli A, Lehikoinen A, Bock A, Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Girardello M, Valkama J (2018) Stronger response of farmland birds than farmers to climate change leads to the emergence of an ecological trap. Biol Conserv 217:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sauer JR, Fallon JE, Johnson R (2003) Use of North American breeding bird survey data to estimate population change for bird conservation regions. J Wildl Manage 67:372–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F et al (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schooley RL (1994) Annual variation in habitat selection: patterns concealed by pooled data. J Wildl Manage 58:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2011) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal 92:235–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stephens DW, Brown JS, Ydenberg RC (2007) Foraging behavior and ecology. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA et al (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thibault I, Ouellet J-P (2005) Hunting behaviour of eastern coyotes in relation to vegetation cover, snow conditions, and hare distribution. Ecoscience 12:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trent TT, Rongstad OJ (1974) Home range and survival of cottontail rabbits in southwestern Wisconsin. J Wildl Manage 38:459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. USDA Farm Service Agency (2017) State acres for wildlife enhancement (SAFE) program. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC. Available from https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/FactSheets/2017/safe_fact_sheet_jan2017.pdf. Accessed March 2017
  93. USDA NASS [U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service] (2012) 2012 census of agriculture. https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf. Accessed Feb 2017
  94. Villafuerte R, Litvaitis JA, Smith DF (1997) Physiological responses by lagomorphs to resource limitations imposed by habitat fragmentation: implications for condition-sensitive predation. Can J Zool 75:148–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wagner F, Stoddart L (1972) Influence of coyote predation on black-tailed jackrabbit populations in Utah. J Wildl Manage 36:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ward MP, Sperry JH, Weatherhead PJ (2013) Evaluation of automated radio telemetry for quantifying movements and home ranges of snakes. J Herpetol 47:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Warner RE (1994) Agricultural land use and grassland habitat in Illinois: future shock for Midwestern birds? Conserv Biol 8:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Washburn BE (2000) Ecological relationships among eastern cottontail rabbits, tall fescue, and native warm-season grasses. Dissertation, University of KentuckyGoogle Scholar
  99. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:S120–S139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wibbicombe W, Thelen K (2002) Row width and plant density effects on corn grain production in the northern corn belt. Agron J 94:1020–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Windberg LA, Mitchell CD (1990) Winter diets of coyotes in relation to prey abundance in southern Texas. J Mammal 71:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Young JK, Andelt WF, Terletzky PA, Shivik JA (2006) A comparison of coyote ecology after 25 years: 1978 versus 2003. Can J Zool 84:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options