Landscape predictors of rodent dynamics in fragmented rainforests
- 118 Downloads
Land-use change threatens a large number of tropical species (so-called ‘loser’ species), but a small subset of disturbance-adapted species may proliferate in human-modified landscapes (‘winner’ species). Identifying such loser and winner species is critically needed to improve conservation plans, but this task requires longitudinal studies that are extremely rare. We assessed this topic with small rodent assemblages in the Lacandona rainforest, a relatively new and highly dynamic agricultural frontier from southeastern Mexico. In particular, we measured the abundance of four rodent species in 12 forest sites during a 6 year period. We related changes in abundance to differences across time in landscape structure (i.e., percentage of forest cover, matrix contrast, number of forest patches, and forest edge density) surrounding each site. Total rodent abundance was almost two times higher in 2016 than in 2011, although abundances were generally low in all years. The abundance of Heteromys desmarestianus increased through time, mainly in forest sites with increasing matrix contrast. Oryzomys sp. also tended to increase in abundance, especially in sites with decreasing edge density. Sigmodon toltecus remained stable through time, but Peromyscus mexicanus tended to decrease in abundance, particularly in sites with decreasing edge density and increasing matrix contrast across time. Therefore, spatial variations in landscape structure lead to species-specific responses. If current deforestation rates persist, we predict a population decline of forest-specialist species (P. mexicanus), and an increase in generalist species (S. toltecus and Oryzomys sp.). Improving matrix quality is crucial for preventing the extinction of forest-specialist rodent species.
KeywordsHabitat fragmentation Human-modified landscape Lacandona rainforest Landscape structure Multi-scale approach Winner species
We thank financial support provided by PAPIIT-DGAPA, UNAM (Grant IN-204215), CONACyT (Project 2015-253946), and Rufford Small Grants (No. 22049-1). N.P.A.P. obtained a graduate scholarship from CONACyT. This paper constitutes a partial fulfillment of the PhD program of the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). V.A.-R. thanks PASPA-DGAPA-UNAM for funding his sabbatical stay at the Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Carleton University. The Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, UNAM, provided logistical support. We thank Carlos Palomares Magaña (Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Morelia, UNAM) for his technical support in GIS. H. Ferreira, A. Valencia and A. López also provided technical support. Three anonymous reviewers provided valuable insights on the manuscript. Livia León Paniagua (Faculty of Sciences, UNAM) and IDEA WILD provided some Sherman traps. We thank the landowners from the Marqués de Comillas region (Ixcán, Loma Bonita, Chajul, Pirú, Reforma, Galacia, Flor de Marqués), for allowing us to collect data on their properties, as well as the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos A.C., and the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP). A special acknowledgement to Audón Jamangapé and his family, as this study would not have been possible without their assistance in the field.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no other conflict of interest.
This research adhered to national and international guidelines for the treatment of research animals, and was conducted in accordance with the legal requirements of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), and the country of Mexico. We assured the welfare of all rodents captured in the study. We were granted access to the study sites by local communities, landowners, and the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, part of the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas of Mexico (CONANP).
- Andresen E, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Escobar F (2018) Tropical biodiversity: the roles of biotic interactions in its origin, maintenance, function and conservation. In: Dáttilo W, Rico-Gray V (eds) Ecological networks in the tropics. Springer, New York, pp 1–13Google Scholar
- Arriaga L, Espinoza J, Aguilar C et al (2000) Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México. CONABIO, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Carabias J, de la Maza J, Cadena R (2015) Conservación y desarrollo sustentable en la Selva Lacandona. 25 años de actividades y experiencias. Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
- Ceballos G, Oliva G (2005) Los mamíferos silvestres de México. CONABIO & Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
- Courtier S, Núñez JM, Kolb M (2012) Measuring tropical deforestation with error margins: a method for REDD monitoring in south-eastern Mexico. In: Sudarshana P (ed) Tropical forests. InTech, Shanghai, pp 269–296Google Scholar
- FAO (2016) State of the World’s Forests 2016. Forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. SAGE publications Inc, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- Howe HF, Davlantes J (2017) Waxing and waning of a cotton rat (Sigmodon toltecus) monoculture in early tropical restoration. Trop Conserv Sci 10:1–11Google Scholar
- Instituto Nacional de Ecología (2000) Programa de Manejo Reserva de la Biósfera Montes Azules. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
- Malcolm JR (1995) Forest structure and the abundance and diversity of Neotropical small mammals. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest canopies. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 179–197Google Scholar
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 07 November 2018
- Meli P, Hernández-Cárdenas G, Carabias J et al (2015) La deforestación de los ecosistemas naturales en Marqués de Comillas. In: Carabias J, de la Maza J, Cadena R (eds) Conservación y desarrollo sustentable de la Selva Lacandona. Natura y Ecosistemas Mexicanos A.C, Mexico City, pp 247–259Google Scholar
- Mendes C (2014) Patch size, shape and edge distance influences seed predation in a keystone palm in tropical rainforests. MS Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociencias de Rio Claro, Rio ClaroGoogle Scholar
- Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtshein CJ et al (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Pfeifer M, Lefebvre V, Peres CA et al (2017) Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551:187–191Google Scholar
- Reid FA (2009) A field guide to the mammals of Central America & Southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Silvy NJ, López RR, Peterson MJ (2005) Wildlife marking techniques. In: Braun EE (ed) Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. The Wildlife Society Inc., Bethesda, pp 339–376Google Scholar