Advertisement

Brazilian wetlands on the brink

  • Daniel Grasel
  • Philip Martin Fearnside
  • Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule
  • Reinaldo Luiz Bozelli
  • Roger Paulo Mormul
  • Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues
  • Florian Wittmann
  • Angelo Antonio Agostinho
  • João André Jarenkow
Letter to the Editor
  • 44 Downloads

Notes

Acknowledgements

DG was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES); PMF, JRSV, RLB, RPM, RRR and AAA received grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq); PMF, RLB and RRR were also supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM) and Rede Clima, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), respectively.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brancalion PHS, Garcia LC, Loyola R, Rodrigues RR, Pillar VD, Lewinsohn TM (2016) A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat Conserv 14:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Grasel D, Mormul RP, Bozelli RL, Thomaz SM, Jarenkow JA (2018) Brazil’s Native Vegetation Protection Law threatens to collapse pond functions. Perspect Ecol Conserv.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gumbricht T, Roman-Cuesta RM, Verchot L, Herold M, Wittmann F, Householder E, Herold N, Murdiyarso D (2017) An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor. Glob Change Biol 23:3581–3599.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. https://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.358.aspx.pdf. Accessed 08 October 2018
  5. Metzger JP, Lewinsohn TM, Joly CA, Verdade LM, Martinelli LA, Rodrigues RR (2010) Brazilian law: full speed in reverse? Science 329:276–277.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.276-b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Moomaw WR, Chmura GL, Davies GT, Finlayson CM, Middleton BA, Natali SM, Perry JE, Roulet N, Sutton-Grier AE (2018) Wetlands in a changing climate: science, policy and management. Wetlands 38:183–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1023-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Padial AA, Agostinho AA, Azevedo-Santos VM et al (2017) The “Tilapia Law” encouraging non-native fish threatens Amazonian river basins. Biodivers Conserv 26:243–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1229-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pelicice FM, Azevedo-Santos VM, Vitule JRS, Orsi ML, Lima Junior DP, Magalhães ALB, Pompeu PS, Petrere M Jr, Agostinho AA (2017) Neotropical freshwater fishes imperiled by unsustainable policies. Fish Fish 18:1119–1133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rovai AS, Menghini RP, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Molero GC, Coelho C Jr (2012) Protecting Brazil’s coastal wetlands. Science 335:1571–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.335.6076.1571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. SBPC, ABC (Sociedade Brasileira para o Progresso da Ciência, Academia Brasileira de Ciências) (2012) The Brazilian forest code and science: contributions to the dialogue. SBPC, ABC, São Paulo. http://www.sbpcnet.org.br/site/publicacoes/outras-publicacoes/CodigoFlorestal_ingles.pdf. Accessed 08 October 2018
  11. Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M, Rodrigues H, Alencar A (2014) Cracking Brazil’s forest code. Science 344:363–364.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Souza PT Jr, Piedade MTF, Candotti E (2011) Brazil’s forest code puts wetlands at risk. Nature 478:458.  https://doi.org/10.1038/478458b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, Silva VP, Valentim JF, Vianna M, Assad ED (2014) When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob Environ Chang 28:8497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Volcan MV, Lanés LEK (2018) Brazilian killifishes risk extinction. Science 361:340–341.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5930 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Instituto de BiociênciasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da AmazôniaManausBrazil
  3. 3.Departamento de Engenharia Ambiental, Setor de TecnologiaUniversidade Federal do ParanáCuritibaBrazil
  4. 4.Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  5. 5.Departamento de Biologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Limnologia, Ictiologia e AquiculturaUniversidade Estadual de MaringáMaringáBrazil
  6. 6.Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de QueirozUniversidade de São PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  7. 7.Department of Wetland Ecology, Institute for Geography and GeoecologyKarlsruhe Institute for TechnologyRastattGermany
  8. 8.Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations