Biodiversity and Conservation

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1545–1548 | Cite as

Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings

Letter to the Editor
  • 157 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Invasive species

References

  1. Castro-Díez P, Godoy O, Alonso A et al (2013) What explains variation in the impacts of exotic plant invasions on the nitrogen cycle? A meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12197 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Essl F, Dullinger S, Rabitsch W et al (2011) Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt. P Natl Acad Sci USA 108:203–207.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011728108/-/DCSupplemental/pnas.201011728SI.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sánchez MI, Vilà M (2016) Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 22:151–163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guerin GR, Martín-Forés I, Sparrow B et al (2017) The biodiversity impacts of non-native species should not be extrapolated from biased single-species studies. Biodivers Conserv.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1439-0 Google Scholar
  5. Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V et al (2013) Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28:212–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson MC (2015) Interactions among multiple invasive animals. Ecology 96:2035–2041CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2015) Negative, neutral, and positive interactions among nonnative plants: patterns, processes, and management implications. Glob Change Biol 21:926–934.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12711 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuebbing SE, Nuñez MA (2016) Invasive non-native plants have a greater effect on neighbouring natives than other non-natives. Nat Plants.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.134 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuebbing SE, Simberloff D (2015) Missing the bandwagon: nonnative species impacts still concern managers. NeoBiota 25:73–86.  https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.25.8921 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y et al (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02290.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paolucci EM, MacIsaac HJ, Ricciardi A (2013) Origin matters: alien consumers inflict greater damage on prey populations than do native consumers. Divers Distrib 19:988–995.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010034312781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peltzer DA, Bellingham PJ, Kurokawa H et al (2009) Punching above their weight: low-biomass non-native plant species alter soil properties during primary succession. Oikos 118:1001–1014.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17244.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J et al (2008) Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23:237–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE et al (2012) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ricciardi A, Ryan R (2017) The exponential growth of invasive species denialism. Biol Invasions.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1561-7 Google Scholar
  17. Richardson DM, Ricciardi A (2013) Misleading criticisms of invasion science: a field guide. Divers Distrib 19:1461–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Rejmánek M et al (2000) Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 6:93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenthal R (1979) The “File Drawer Problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 86:638–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P et al (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Twardochleb LA, Olden JD, Larson ER (2013) A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of nonnative crayfish. Freshw Sci 32:1367–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1899/12-203.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13:235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Essl F et al (2015) Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525:100–103.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M et al (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Young AM, Larson BMH (2011) Clarifying debates in invasion biology A survey of invasion biologists. Environ Res 111:893–898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.06.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Laboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA, CONICETUniversidad Nacional del ComahueSan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations