Pathways between contrasting ecotourism experiences and conservation engagement Original Paper First Online: 03 January 2019 Part of the following topical collections: Biodiversity appreciation and engagement Abstract
It is commonly believed that nature experiences lead to increased concern for nature, and ultimately, the expression of conservation behaviours. Captive and non-captive ecotourism experiences with charismatic megafauna have been associated with conservation support. However, there is little research examining experiences with non-mammalian wildlife, or familiar species in domestic settings. We conducted interviews (N = 427) at two ecotourism destinations in Australia (a conservation-focused zoological park and a rainforest national park), to determine whether these experiences are associated with conservation engagement and if so, the pathways through which these might operate. Interviews identified the elements of experience (site, duration, animal encounter, educational shows, and interpretive signs), the subjective aspects of their experience (positive and negative emotions, learning, connection, reflection), and engagement in conservation (environmental intentions, policy support and signing a conservation-focused pledge). Regression analyses examined the relationship between elements of experience and conservation engagement, while controlling for demographics and nature-relatedness. Participating in non-captive bird feeding at the rainforest site was associated with greater support for conservation policies, whereas visiting the zoological park was associated with greater intention to seek and share conservation information. Mediation analysis demonstrated that both of these relationships were mediated by feeling upset about environmental problems, indicating a role for negative emotions alongside ecotourism experiences in prompting conservation engagement. No element of the experience was associated with signing the pledge, highlighting the challenges of eliciting behaviour change. Overall, these findings suggest that different types of ecotourism experiences may generate different types of conservation engagement, and that that associated negative emotions about the plight of species can foster stronger engagement in conservation issues.
Keywords Animal encounters Behaviour change Bird feeding Ecotourism Education Negative emotions Policy support Psychology
Communicated by Adeline Loyau.
This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity appreciation and engagement.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (
) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-01694-4 Notes Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Lone Pine Koala Sanctuary and O’Reilly’s Rainforest Retreat for their participation in the research and their interest in evaluating and improving conservation education at their sites. Also special thanks to T. Kinrade and D. Moffitt for their assistance with data collection.
This study did not receive any external funding.
Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acevedo-Gutiérrez A, Acevedo L, Boren L (2011) Effects of the presence of official-looking volunteers on harassment of New Zealand fur seals. Conserv Biol 25:623–627.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01611.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, London
Amel E, Manning C, Scott B, Koger S (2017) Beyond the roots of human inaction: fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356:275–278.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1931 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ardoin NM, Wheaton M, Bowers AW, Hunt CA, Durham WH (2015) Nature-based tourism’s impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. J Sustain Tour 23:838–858.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K, Dierking L (2007) Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environ Educ Res 13:367–383.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701430604 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ballantyne R, Packer J, Falk J (2011a) Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modelling. Tour Manag 32:1243–1252.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.11.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
Ballantyne R, Packer J, Sutherland LA (2011b) Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tour Manag 32:770–779.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
Baron R, Logan H, Lilly J, Inman M, Brennan M (1994) Negative emotion and message processing. J Exp Soc Psychol 30:181–201.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1009 CrossRef Google Scholar
Chawla L (1999) Life paths into effective environmental action. J Environ Educ 31:15–26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598628 CrossRef Google Scholar
Chawla L (2006) Research methods to investigate significant life experiences: review and recommendations. Environ Educ Res 12:359–374.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600942840 CrossRef Google Scholar
Clapp JD, Beck JG, Palyo SA, Grant DM (2008) An examination of the synergy of pain and PTSD on quality of life: additive or multiplicative effects? Pain 138:301–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.01.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
Clayton S, Fraser J, Saunders CD (2009) Zoo experiences: conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biol 28:377–397.
https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20186 CrossRef Google Scholar
Clayton S, Fraser J, Burgess C (2011) The role of zoos in fostering environmental identity. Ecopsychology 3:87–96.
https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2010.0079 CrossRef Google Scholar
Clayton S et al (2017) Transformation of experience: toward a new relationship with nature. Conserv Lett 10:645–651.
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12337 CrossRef Google Scholar
Cohen J (1978) Partialed products are interactions—partialed powers are curve components. Psychol Bull 85:858–866.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.85.4.858 CrossRef Google Scholar
Colléony A, Clayton S, Couvet D, Saint Jalme M, Prévot A-C (2017a) Human preferences for species conservation: animal charisma trumps endangered status. Biol Conserv 206:263–269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.035 CrossRef Google Scholar
Colléony A, Martin L, Misdariis N, Clayton S, Saint Jalme M, Prévot A-C (2017b) Exoticism as a mediator of everyday experiences of nature: an anthropological exploration of soundscape in zoos. Interdiscip J 45:673–682.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-017-9937-y Google Scholar
D’Amato LG, Krasny ME (2011) Outdoor adventure education: applying transformative learning theory to understanding instrumental learning and personal growth in environmental education. J Environ Educ 42:237–254.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.581313 CrossRef Google Scholar
Dean AJ, Lindsay J, Fielding K, Smith L (2016) Fostering water sensitive citizenship—community profiles of engagement in water-related issues. Environ Sci Policy Part 1 55:238–247.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Dean AJ, Church EK, Loder J, Fielding KS, Wilson KA (2018) How do marine and coastal citizen science experiences foster environmental engagement? J Environ Manag 213:409–416.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.080 CrossRef Google Scholar
DeMares R (2000) Human peak experience triggered by encounters with cetaceans. Anthrozoos 13:89–103
CrossRef Google Scholar
Diduck A, Sinclair AJ, Hostetler G, Fitzpatrick P (2012) Transformative learning theory, public involvement, and natural resource and environmental management. J Environ Plann Man 55:1311–1330.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.645718 CrossRef Google Scholar
Dierking L, Adelman L, Ogden J, Lehnhardt K, Miller L, Mellen J (2004) Using a behavior change model to document the impact of visits to Disney’s animal kingdom: a study investigating intended conservation action. Curator 47:322–343
CrossRef Google Scholar
Duerden MD, Witt PA (2010) The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:379–392.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
Esson M, Moss A (2013) The risk of delivering disturbing messages to zoo family audiences. J Environ Educ 44:79–96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.695408 CrossRef Google Scholar
Fritsche I, Jonas E, Kayser DN, Koranyi N (2010) Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. J Environ Psychol 30:67–79.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.08.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2013) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
Grajal A et al (2017) The complex relationship between personal sense of connection to animals and self-reported proenvironmental behaviors by zoo visitors. Conserv Biol 31:322–330.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12780 CrossRef Google Scholar
Grandcolas PP, Roseli (2016) Biodiversity conservation and phylogenetic systematics: preserving our evolutionary heritage in an extinction crisis. Topics in biodiversity and conservation, 1st edn. Springer, Cham
Hausmann A, Toivonen T, Slotow R, Tenkanen H, Moilanen A, Heikinheimo V, Minin ED (2018) Social media data can be used to understand tourists’ preferences for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Conserv Lett 11:e12343.
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12343 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York
Haywood BK (2016) Beyond data points and research contributions: the personal meaning and value associated with public participation in scientific research. Int J Sci Educ Part B 6:239–262.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1043659 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hooke RL, Martín-Duque JF (2012) Land transormation by humans. GSA Today 12:4–10
CrossRef Google Scholar
Hughes K (2013) Measuring the impact of viewing wildlife: do positive intentions equate to long-term changes in conservation behaviour? J Sustain Tour 21:42–59
CrossRef Google Scholar
Hughes K, Packer J, Ballantyne R (2011) Using post-visit action resources to support family conservation learning following a wildlife tourism experience. Environ Educ Res 17:307–328.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.540644 CrossRef Google Scholar
Jones D (2011) An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu Austral Ornithol 111:i–vii.
https://doi.org/10.1071/MUv111n2_ED CrossRef Google Scholar
Klein ML, Humphrey SR, Percival HF (1995) Effects of ecotourism on distribution of waterbirds in a wildlife refuge. Conserv Biol 9:1454–1465.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061454.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Kolb AY, Kolb DA (2009) The learning way: meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simul Gaming 40:297–327.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108325713 CrossRef Google Scholar
Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to proenvironmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401 CrossRef Google Scholar
Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77:45–72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 CrossRef Google Scholar
Lokhorst AM, Werner C, Staats H, van Dijk E, Gale JL (2013) Commitment and behavior change: a meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environ Behav 45:3–34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411477 CrossRef Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr D, Schultz PW (2014) Choosing effective behavior change tools. Soc Market Q 20:35–46
CrossRef Google Scholar
Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
Moscardo G, Saltzer R (2004) Understanding wildlife tourism markets. Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd and Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism, Australia
Moss A, Jensen E, Gusset M (2015) Evaluating the contribution of zoos and aquariums to Aichi Biodiversity Target 1. Conserv Biol 29:537–544.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12383 CrossRef Google Scholar
Muloin S (1998) Wildlife tourism: the psychological benefits of whale watching Pacific. Tour Rev 2:199–213
Myers OE, Saunders CD, Birjulin AA (2004) Emotional dimensions of watching zoo animals: an experience sampling study building on insights from psychology. Curator 47:299–321
CrossRef Google Scholar
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM (2013) The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Front Psychol.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813 Google Scholar
Nisbet EK, Zelenski JM, Murphy SA (2008) The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environ Behav 41:715–740.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748 CrossRef Google Scholar
O’Neill F, Barnard S, Lee D (2004) Best practice and interpretation in tourist/wildlife encounters: a wild dolphin swim tour example. J Sustain Tour 21:7–25
Osbaldiston R, Schott JP (2012) Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environ Behav 44:257–299.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673 CrossRef Google Scholar
Prévot A-C, Cheval H, Raymond R, Cosquer A (2018a) Routine experiences of nature in cities can increase personal commitment toward biodiversity conservation. Biol Conserv 226:1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
Prévot A-C, Clayton S, Mathevet R (2018b) The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environ Educ Res 24:263–279.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456 CrossRef Google Scholar
Pyle R (1978) The extinction of experience. Horticulture 56:64–67
Reddy SMW et al (2017) Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior. Conserv Lett 10:248–256.
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12252 CrossRef Google Scholar
Rowe S, Kisiel J (2012) Family engagement at aquarium touch tanks—exploring interactions and the potential for learning. In: Davidsson E, Jakobsson A (eds) Understanding interactions at science centers and museums: approaching sociocultural perspectives. SensePublishers, Rotterdam, pp 63–77.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_5 CrossRef Google Scholar
Schmitt MT, Aknin LB, Axsen J, Shwom RL (2018) Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecol Econ 143:130–140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
Schrieber LA (2010) Why we feed wild birds: a case study of BTO members motivations for feeding birds in their gardens. University College, London
Schultz PW (2014) Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur Psychol 19:107–117.
https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163 CrossRef Google Scholar
Skibins JC, Powell RB (2013) Conservation caring: measuring the influence of zoo visitors’ connection to wildlife on pro-conservation behaviors. Zoo Biol.
https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.21086 Google Scholar
Skibins J, Powell R, Hallo J (2013a) Charisma and conservation: charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodivers Conserv 22:959–982.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0462-z CrossRef Google Scholar
Skibins JC, Dunstan E, Pahlow K (2013b) Exploring the influence of charismatic characteristics on flagship outcomes in zoo visitors. Human Dimens Wildl 22:157–171.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2016.1276233 CrossRef Google Scholar
Smith L, Weiler B, Smith A, van Dijk P (2012) Applying visitor preference criteria to choose pro-wildlife behaviors to ask of zoo visitors. Curator 55:453–466.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2012.00168.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Steg L, Vlek C (2009) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol 29:309–317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175 CrossRef Google Scholar
Steven R, Morrison C, Castley JG (2016) Exploring attitudes and understanding of global conservation practice among birders and avitourists for enhanced conservation of birds. Bird Conserv Int 27:224–236.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270916000174 CrossRef Google Scholar
Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Carrier SJ, Strnad RL, Bondell HD, Kirby-Hathaway T, Moore SE (2014) Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. J Environ Educ 45:163–177.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.901935 CrossRef Google Scholar
Swanagan JS (2000) Factors influencing zoo visitors’ conservation attitudes and behavior. J Environ Educ 31:26–31.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598648 CrossRef Google Scholar
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013) Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn. Pearson Education, Boston
Tennant R et al (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:63.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63 CrossRef Google Scholar
Thomas EF, McGarty C, Mavor KI (2009) Transforming “apathy into movement”: the role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 13:310–333.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290 CrossRef Google Scholar
Veríssimo D, Fraser I, Groombridge J, Bristol R, MacMillan DC (2009) Birds as tourism flagship species: a case study of tropical islands. Anim Conserv 12:549–558.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00282.x CrossRef Google Scholar
Wilson E (2016) Half-earth: our planet’s fight for life, 1st edn. Liveright Publishing Corporation, New York
Zeppel HM, Muloin S (2007) Marine wildlife tours: benefits for participants. Marine wildlife and tourism management: insights from the natural and social sciences. CABI International, Wallingford
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Nature B.V. 2019