Spatial patterns and drivers of invasive rodent dynamics in New Zealand forests

  • Susan WalkerEmail author
  • Joshua R. Kemp
  • Graeme P. Elliott
  • Corey C. Mosen
  • John G. Innes
Original Paper


Populations of invasive ship rat (Rattus rattus) and house mouse (Mus musculus) vary greatly over both time and space in New Zealand’s indigenous forests. Both species threaten endemic fauna, and their spatiotemporal variation over short time scales and steep environmental gradients present substantial challenges for conservation management. We fitted models to 18 years of 3-monthly records from a large-scale tracking-tunnel network to (1) predict, classify and describe forest-wide spatial patterns of temporal dynamics of unmanaged rat and mouse populations, and (2) understand the population-limiting roles of environment and biotic interactions. We distinguish six classes of forest rodent dynamics by classifying deciles of predicted rat-tracking rates. Classes form sequences across broad latitudinal and elevation gradients, and grade from ‘irruptive’, with low median but synchronous high maximum rat and mouse tracking rates in colder forests, to ‘continuously ratty’, with high median rat and low unsynchronised mouse tracking rates in warmer forests. Mice irrupt alone more frequently in colder forests, and their tracking rates are spatially reciprocal with rat tracking rate minima but not maxima. We conclude that predictable spatial patterns of rodent population dynamics arise from stronger low-temperature limitations on rats than mice, biotic limitation of mice by rats, and spatiotemporal food resource patterns affecting both species. Practical implications are that native species conservation in New Zealand forests requires spatially-differentiated predator management regimes; ship rats are likely to become increasingly prevalent at higher elevations as climate warms; and suppression of ship rats alone will release house mouse populations, especially in warmer forests.


Biotic interactions Spatiotemporal clustering Pulsed resources Rodent irruptions Forest ecosystem 



Core funding from the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment to Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research supported the analysis. New Zealand’s Department of Conservation designed, collected, and curated the rodent tracking dataset over two decades: we thank many individuals who contributed to this in the field and office. We thank R. Price, A. Monks, W.G. Lee, and R.T.T. Stephens for advice and review.

Data accessibility

The data used in this study will be made available in the permanent Landcare Research Repository

Supplementary material

10530_2019_1922_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 2132 kb)


  1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell GL, Potter MA, McLennan JA, Minot EO (2003) The role of predators in ship rat and house mouse population eruptions: drivers or passengers? Oikos 100:601–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridgman L, Innes J, Gillies C, Fitzgerald N, Rohan M, King C (2018) Interactions between ship rats and house mice at Pureora Forest Park. New Zeal J Zool 45:238–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown KP, Moller H, Innes J, Alterio N (1996) Calibration of tunnel tracking rates to estimate relative abundance of ship rats (Rattus rattus) and mice (Mus musculus) in a New Zealand forest. New Zeal J Ecol 20:271–275Google Scholar
  5. Brown K, Elliott GE, Innes J, Kemp J (2015) Ship rat, stoat and possum control on mainland New Zealand: an overview of techniques, successes and challenges. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Caughley G, Peek JM, Flader SL (1981) Comments on “Natural regulation of ungulates (what constitutes a real wilderness?)”. Wildl Soc B 9:232–238Google Scholar
  7. Chapman TB, Veblen TT, Schoennagel T (2012) Spatiotemporal patterns of mountain pine beetle activity in the southern rocky mountains. Ecology 93:2175–2185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christie JE, Wilson PR, Taylor RH, Elliott GE (2017) How elevation affects ship rat (Rattus rattus) capture patterns, Mt Misery, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 41:113–119Google Scholar
  9. Dowding JE, Murphy EC (1994) Ecology of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in a kauri (Agathis australis) forest in Northland, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 18:19–27Google Scholar
  10. Dymond JR, Shepherd JD (2004) The spatial distribution of indigenous forest and its composition in the Wellington region, New Zealand, from ETM + satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 90:116–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Efford MG, Fitzgerald BM, Karl BJ, Berben PH (2006) Population dynamics of the ship rat Rattus rattus L. in the Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. New Zeal J Zool 33:273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott GP, Kemp J (2016) Large-scale pest control in New Zealand beech forests. Ecol Manag Restor 17:200–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott GP, Wilson PR, Taylor RH, Beggs JR (2010) Declines in common, widespread native birds in a mature temperate forest. Biol Cons 143:2119–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillies C, Williams D (2013) DOC tracking tunnel guide v2.5.2: using tracking tunnels to monitor rodents and mustelids. Department of Conservation, Science & Capability Group, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldwater N, Perry GLW, Clout MN (2012) Responses of house mice to the removal of mammalian predators and competitors. Austral Ecol 37:971–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill RS, Jordan GJ, Macphail MK (2015) Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato. Aust Syst Bot 28:190–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Innes JG (2005) Ship rat. In: King CM (ed) The handbook of New Zealand mammals. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 187–203Google Scholar
  20. Innes JG, Warburton B, Williams D, Speed H, Bradfield P (1995) Large-scale poisoning of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in indigenous forests of the North Island, New Zealand. New Zeal J Ecol 19:5–17Google Scholar
  21. Innes JG, King CM, Flux M, Kimberley MO (2001) Population biology of the ship rat and Norway rat in Pureora Forest Park, 1983–87. New Zeal J Zool 28:57–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Innes JG, Kelly D, Overton JM, Gillies C (2010) Predation and other factors currently limiting New Zealand forest birds. New Zeal J Ecol 34:86–114Google Scholar
  23. Kassambara A (2017) Practical guide to cluster analysis in R: unsupervised machine learning, vol 1. STHDA.
  24. King CM (1983) The relationships between beech (Nothofagus spp.) seedfall and populations of mice (Mus musculus), and the demographic and dietary responses of stoats (Mustela erminea), in three New Zealand forests. J Anim Ecol 52:141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. King CM, Innes JG, Flux M, Kimberley MO, Leathwick JR, Williams DS (1996) Distribution and abundance of small mammals in relation to habitat in Pureora Forest Park. N Zeal J Ecol 20:215–240Google Scholar
  26. Krebs CJ (2013) Population fluctuations in rodents. University of Chicago Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leathwick JR (2001) New Zealand’s potential forest pattern as predicted from current species–environment relationships. New Zeal J Bot 39:447–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Norbury GL, Pech RP, Byrom AE, Innes J (2015) Density-impact functions for terrestrial vertebrate pests and indigenous biota: guidelines for conservation managers. Biol Cons 191:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Donnell CF, Weston KA, Monks JM (2017) Impacts of introduced mammalian predators on New Zealand’s alpine fauna. New Zeal J Ecol 41:1–22Google Scholar
  30. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–131Google Scholar
  31. Ridgeway G (2017) gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models. R package version 2.1.3.
  32. Riney T, Watson JS, Bassett C, Turbott EG, Howard WE (1959) Lake Monk expedition: an ecological study in Southern Fiordland. DSIR Bull 135:1–75Google Scholar
  33. Ruscoe WA, Murphy EC (2005) House mouse. In: King CM (ed) The handbook of New Zealand mammals. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 204–221Google Scholar
  34. Ruscoe WA, Ramsey DS, Pech RP, Sweetapple PJ, Yockney I, Barron MC, Perry M, Nugent G, Carran R, Warne R, Brusch C, Duncan RP (2011) Unexpected consequences of control: competitive vs. predator release in four-species assemblage of invasive mammals. Ecol Lett 14:1035–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manaaki Whenua − Landcare ResearchDunedinNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of ConservationNelsonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Manaaki Whenua − Landcare ResearchHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations