Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Not so fast: promoting invasive species to enhance multifunctionality in a native ecosystem requires strong(er) scrutiny

  • E. E. SotkaEmail author
  • J. E. Byers
Invasion Note

Abstract

Since at least the 1980s, ecologists have argued that restoring ecosystem functioning in highly degraded areas is the “acid test” for ecological understanding (Bradshaw 1987). Ecosystem engineers and foundational species are often considered pivotal in the restoration of degraded areas (Suding et al. 2004; Byers et al. 2006), as by definition, they “engineer” biotic structure that serves as habitat. For decades, ecologists have debated when and where we may promote non-native engineers instead of native engineers for restoration. Entering into this long-standing debate, Ramus et al. (2017) reported the results from a field experiment in North Carolina with the Japanese seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla and concluded that this and other invasive engineering species should more frequently be considered as candidate species to restore ecosystem function of degraded habitats. Here, we argue that it is premature to suggest we understand the effects of the non-native Gracilaria on the native estuarine system well enough to promote this invader as a lynchpin of restoration efforts. Our argument is fourfold: (1) The net ecosystem effects of Gracilaria remain unknown because Ramus et al. overstated or did not examine the ability of the invasive seaweed to perform key services. (2) The conclusion of enhanced multifunctionality is highly dependent on several subjective, poorly justified decisions regarding the treatment of variables. (3) Contrary to the claim by Ramus et al., the mudflats where Gracilaria resides are not a barren sedimentary landscape without its presence. Finally, (4) Ramus et al. rely on a well-worn “strawman” approach that ignores decades of ecological research. No doubt, there are systems in which non-native engineers benefit local ecosystem functioning, but any recommendation to use a non-native in such a capacity should require careful and thorough evaluation.

Keywords

Macroalgae Multifunctionality index Positive effects Restoration ecology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for thoughtful comments that improved this manuscript.

References

  1. Armstrong J, Armstrong W (1988) Phragmites australis—a preliminary study of soil oxidizing and internal gas transport pathways. New Phytol 108:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker D (1960) Het botanisch onderzoek in de IJsselmeerpolders. Vakblad voor biologen 4:63–79Google Scholar
  3. Bradshaw AD (1987) Restoration: the acid test for ecology. In: Jordan WR, Gilpin ME, Aber JD III (eds) Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 23–29Google Scholar
  4. Byers JE, Grabowski JH (2014) Soft-sediment communities. In: Bertness MD, Bruno JF, Silliman BR, Stachowicz JJ (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 227–249Google Scholar
  5. Byers JE, Cuddington K, Jones C, Talley T, Hastings A, Lambrinos J, Crooks J, Wilson W (2006) Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems. Trends Ecol Evol 21:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byers JE, Gribben PE, Yeager C, Sotka EE (2012) Impacts of an abundant introduced ecosystem engineer within mudflats of the southeastern US coast. Biol Invasions 14:2587–2600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrnes JEK et al (2014) Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell DE, Lu HF, Knox GA, Odum HT (2009) Maximizing empower on a human-dominated planet: the role of exotic Spartina. Ecol Eng 35:463–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dame R, Alber M, Allen D, Mallin M, Montague C, Lewitus A, Chalmers A, Gardner R, Gilman C, Kjerfve B, Pinckney J, Smith N (2000) Estuaries of the south Atlantic coast of North America: their geographical signatures. Estuaries 23:793–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein G, Smale DA (2017) Undaria pinnatifida: a case study to highlight challenges in marine invasion ecology and management. Ecol Evol 7:8624–8642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewel JJ, Putz FE (2004) A place for alien species in ecosystem restoration. Front Ecol Environ 2:354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez M, Iribarne OO, Armstrong DA (1993) Habitat selection of young of the year Dungeness crab Cancer magister Dana and predation risk in intertidal habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 92:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerard A, Ganzhorn JU, Kull CA, Carrière SM (2015) Possible roles of introduced plants for native vertebrate conservation: the case of Madagascar. Restor Ecol 23:768–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gonzalez DJ, Smyth AR, Piehler MF, McGlathery KJ (2013) Mats of the non-native macroalga, Gracilaria vermiculophylla, alter net denitrification rates and nutrient fluxes on intertidal mudflats. Limnol Oceanogr 58:2101–2108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez DJ, Gonzalez RA, Froelich BA, Oliver JD, Noble RT, McGlathery KJ (2014) Non-native macroalga may increase concentrations of Vibrio bacteria on intertidal mudflats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 505:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths J, Villablanca F (2015) Managing monarch butterfly overwintering groves: making room among the eucalyptus. Calif Fish Game 101(1):40–50Google Scholar
  17. Gulbransen D, McGlathery K (2013) Nitrogen transfers mediated by a perennial, non-native macroalga: a 15 N tracer study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 482:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haram LE, Kinney KA, Sotka EE, Byers JE (in press) Mixed effects of an introduced ecosystem engineer on the foraging behavior and habitat selection of predators. Ecology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2495
  19. Jacob AL, Lechowicz MJ, Chapman CA (2017) Non-native fruit trees facilitate colonization of native forest on abandoned farmland. Restor Ecol 25:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacobs DF, Oliet JA, Aronson J, Bolte A, Bullock JM, Donoso PJ, Landhäusser SM, Madsen P, Peng S, Rey-Benayas JM, Weber JC (2015) Restoring forests: What constitutes success in the twenty-first century? New For 46(5–6):601–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnston CA, Lipcius RN (2012) Exotic macroalga Gracilaria vermiculophylla provides superior nursery habitat for native blue crab in Chesapeake bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 467:137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy DM, Konlechner T, Zavadil E, Mariani M, Wong V, Ierodiaconou D, Macreadie P (2017) Invasive cordgrass (Spartina spp.) in south-eastern Australia induces island formation, salt marsh development, and carbon storage. Geogr Res 56:1–12Google Scholar
  23. Knoke T, Bendix J, Pohle P, Hamer U, Hildebrandt P, Roos K, Gerique A, Sandoval ML, Breuer L, Tischer A, Silva B, Calvas B, Aguirre N, Castro LM, Windhorst D, Weber M, Stimm B, Günter S, Palomeque X, Mora J, Mosandl R, Beck E (2014) Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands. Nat Commun 5:5612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kollars NM, Byers JE, Sotka EE (2016) Invasive decor: an association between a native decorator worm and a non-native seaweed can be mutualistic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 545:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kraus ML, Weis P, Crow JH (1986) The excretion of heavy metals by the salt marsh cord grass, Spartina alterniflora, and Spartina’s role in mercury cycling. Mar Environ Res 20:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lenihan HS, Micheli F (2001) Soft-sediment communities. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, pp 253–287Google Scholar
  27. Levin LA, Crooks JA (2012) Functional consequences of invasive species in coastal and estuarine systems. In: Middelburg JJ, Philippart CJM (eds) Treatise on estuarine and coastal science, vol 7. Functioning of ecosystems at the land–ocean interface. Academic press, London, pp 17–51Google Scholar
  28. MacDicken KG (1994) Selection and management of nitrogen-fixing trees. Winrock International, Bangkok, FAO, MorriltonGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K, Chambers RM (2009) Phragmites australis in eastern North America: a historical and ecological perspective. In: Silliman BR, Grosholz ED, Bertness MD (eds) Human impacts on salt marshes: a global perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 57–82Google Scholar
  30. Noonburg EG, Byers JE (2005) More harm than good: when invader vulnerability to predators enhances impact on native species. Ecology 86(10):2555–2560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peverly JH, Surface JM, Wang T (1995) Growth and trace metal absorption by Phragmites australis in wetlands constructed for landfill leachate treatment. Ecol Eng 5:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phelps HL (2005) Use of freshwater mussels to improve water quality at Constitution Gardens. Report to National Park Service, Washington (Unpublished) Google Scholar
  33. Pickering H, Whitmarsh D (1997) Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the “attraction versus production” debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fish Res 31(1–2):39–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pimentel D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D (1999) Environmental and economic costs associated with non-indigenous species in the United States, College of agriculture and life sciences. Cornell University, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Pintor LM, Byers JE (2015) Do native predators benefit from non-native prey? Ecol Lett 18:1174–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ramus AP, Silliman BR, Thomsen MS, Long ZT (2017) An invasive foundation species enhances multifunctionality in a coastal ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:8580–8585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reeders HH, Devaate AB, Slim FJ (1989) The filtration rate of Dreissena polymorpha (Bivalvia) in 3 Dutch lakes with reference to biological water quality management. Freshw Biol 22:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodriguez LF (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions 8:927–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruesink J, Lenihan H, Trimble A, Heiman K, Micheli F, Byers JE, Kay M (2005) Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:643–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruesink JL et al (2006) Changes in productivity associated with four introduced species: ecosystem transformation of a “pristine” estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlaepfer MA, Sax DF, Olden JD (2011) Conserv Biol 25:428–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith LA, Stern N (2011) Uncertainty in science and its role in climate policy. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:4818–4841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sousa R, Gutierrez JL, Aldridge DC (2009) Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biol Invasions 11:2367–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strong DR, Pemberton RW (2000) Ecology—biological control of invading species—risk and reform. Science 288:1969–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suding KN et al (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wan SW, Qin P, Liu JN, Zhou HX (2009) The positive and negative effects of exotic Spartina alterniflora in China. Ecol Eng 35:444–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weis JS, Weis P (2003) Is the invasion of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into tidal marshes of the eastern US an ecological disaster? Mar Pollut Bull 46:816–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams SL, Grosholz ED (2008) The invasive species challenge in estuarine and coastal environments: marrying management and science. Estuaries Coasts 31:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright JT, Byers JE, DeVore JL, Sotka EE (2014) Engineering or food? Mechanisms of facilitation by a habitat-forming invasive seaweed. Ecology 95(10):2699–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology and Grice Marine LaboratoryCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Odum School of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations