Evidence for evolution of increased competitive ability for invasive Centaurea solstitialis, but not for naturalized C. calcitrapa
Congeneric species with the same native and non-native ranges, but exhibiting different invasiveness, provide opportunities to assess the relative importance of factors contributing to successful invasions. For example, comparing the competitive ability of such congeners against other species from the native and non-native regions of invasive species can provide insight into the role of evolutionary experience with different competitors. We selected two congeneric Centaurea species with overlapping native and non-native ranges but with strikingly different invasive success, Centaurea solstitialis and C. calcitrapa, and conducted experiments with populations from each region using a suite of different native grass species from each region. When grown with Spanish grass species, competitive responses were 32% stronger for C. calcitrapa and 30% stronger for C. solstitialis, than when in competition with grasses native to California. Centaurea solstitialis from California had 66% higher competitive effects on grasses, all species considered together, than Spanish C. solstitialis; whereas the competitive effects of C. calcitrapa on grasses were not significantly different between C. calcitrapa ranges. Our results are consistent with the prediction that the evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) might contribute to the devastating success of C. solstitialis in California, and that its absence might contribute to the modest naturalization of the non-invasive C. calcitrapa. Escape from the strong competitive effects and responses of grasses from Spain may also contribute to invasive success in California. Our results suggest that studies of EICA should be based on competitive tests, since biomass alone is not always a good predictor of competitive ability.
KeywordsBiogeography Centaurea calcitrapa Centaurea solstitialis Competitive response Competitive effect Competition Congeners EICA Evolution Exotic Invasion Plants
We would like to thank Giles Thelen, Andrea Krutulis, David Hooper, and Margarita Zorrilla for their help with greenhouse and laboratory work. DM received funding from the Spanish Micinn (2008-0662), and by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia—FCT, through national funds and co-funding by the European PT2020, and COMPETE 2020 programs, within the Grants and Projects: IF-00066-2013; PTDC/BIA-PLA/0763/2014; and UID/BIA/04004/2013. RCG was funded by the MILES/HHMI program of The University of Montana. RMC thanks the NSF EPSCoR Track-1 EPS-1101342 (INSTEP 3).
- Aschehoug ET, Brooker R, Atwater DZ et al (2016) The mechanisms and consequences of interspecific competition among plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 47:263–281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barker BS, Andonian K, Swope SM et al (2017) Population genomic analyses reveal a history of range expansion and trait evolution across the native and invaded range of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Mol Ecol 26:1131–1147. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13998 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Bartolomé C (2005) Los tipos de habitat de interés comunitario de España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, MadridGoogle Scholar
- Bartolome JW, Barry WJ, Griggs T, Hopkinson P (2007) Valley grassland. Terr Vegetarian, California, p 432Google Scholar
- Maddox DM, Mayfield A, Poritz NH (1985) Distribution of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Sci 33:315–327Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2018) Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-117. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 05 Aug 2018
- R Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 05 Aug 2018
- Xiao S, Callaway RM, Graebner R et al (2016) Modeling the relative importance of ecological factors in exotic invasion: the origin of competitors matters, but disturbance in the non-native range tips the balance. Ecol Modell 335:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar