Advertisement

Morphometrics and Mitochondrial DNA Genes Analysis Suggest a New Species of Penaeus (Crustacea: Penaeidae) from the Persian Gulf

  • Saeid Tamadoni Jahromi
  • Ahmad Sofiman Othman
  • Rusly Rosazlina
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

There are two morphotypes of Penaeus semisulcatus described hitherto in the Persian Gulf, namely the banded and non-banded antennae morphotypes. In this study, we used morphometric measurements and two mitochondrial genes (16S rRNA and cytochrome oxidase subunit I—COI) to assess relationships between the two morphotypes of P. semisulcatus. Out of 25 morphological characters examined, 10 characters were found significantly different between the two morphotypes when tested against separate sexes or both sexes combined. Results from the 16S rRNA and COI sequence analysis of two morphotypes of P. semisulcatus morphotype showed up to 6% and 17% sequence divergence, respectively. The 16S rDNA and COI sequences of the non-banding morphotype were not only very different to those of the banding morphotype but was also very different to all other Penaeus species (i.e., P. monodon, P. merguiensis, and P. indicus) included in the study. Both parsimony and Neighbor-Joining trees based on 16S rDNA and COI sequences provide similar tree topology that clearly separated the two morphotypes into two distinct groups. Based on these findings, we propose the two morphotypes of P. semisulcatus to be relegated as two sympatric species.

Keywords

Penaeus semisulcatus mtDNA Morphometric Persian Gulf 16S rRNA COI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute, for helpful assistance. We thank the head of Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecological Research Institute, This research was funded by Postgraduate Research Grant Scheme from Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam MMM, de Cross MDST, Pálsson S (2016) Mitochondrial DNA variation reveals distinct lineages in Penaeus semisulcatus (Decapoda, Penaeidae) from the Indo-West Pacific Ocean. Mar Ecol 38:1–11Google Scholar
  2. Allegrucci G, Cesaroni D, Venanzetti F, Cataudela S, Sbordoni V (1998) Length variation in mtDNA control region in hatchery stocks of European sea bass subjected to acclimation experiments. Genet Sel Evol 30:275–288CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Awadalla P, Eyre-Walker A, Smith JM (1999) Linkage disequilibrium and recombination in hominid mitochondrial DNA. Science 286:2524–2525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin JD, Bass AL, Bowen BW, Clark WH (1998) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the marine shrimp Penaeus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 10:399–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandelt HJ, Forester P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu KH, Tong J, Chan TY (1999) Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I sequence divergence in some Chinese species of Charybdis (Crustacea: Decapoda: Portunidae). Biochem Syst Ecol 27:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Francisco AK, Galetti P (2005) Genetic distance between broodstocks of the marine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Decapoda, Penaeidae) by mtDNA analyses. Genet Mol Biol 28:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Haan (1844) Penaeus semisulcatus, in Von Siebold, Fauna Japonica, Crustacea (6/7): Pl. 46. In: Holthuis LB (ed), FAO catalogue. Shrimps and prawns of the world. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries, vol 1, no 125. Rijksmuseum of Natural History Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  9. Dimmock A, Willamson I, Mather PB (2004) The influence of environment on the morphology of Macrobrachium australiense (Decapoda: Palaemonidae). Aquacult Int 12:435–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endler JA (1983) Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ Biol Fish 9(2):173–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  12. Grey D, Dall W, Baker A (1983). A guide to the Australian Penaeid Prawns. Northern Territory Government Printing Office, The Department of Primary Production of the Northern Territory, Darwin, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. Gusmão J, Lazoski C, Solé-Cava AM (2000) A new species of Penaeus (Crustacea: Penaeidae) revealed by allozyme and cytochrome oxidase I analyses. Mar Biol 37:435–446Google Scholar
  14. Hayashi KI (1992) Dendobranchiata Crustaceans from Japanese Waters. Seibutsu Kenkyusha, Tokyo, p 300Google Scholar
  15. Holthuis LB (1980) Shrimp and prawns of the word. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Species Catalog, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimura MA (1980) Simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavery S, Chan TY, TamY Chuc KH (2004) Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the shrimp genus Penaeus s.l. derived from mitochondrial DNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:39–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Machado EG, Dennebouy N, Suarez MO, Mounolou JC (1993) Monnerot M Mitochondrial 16S-rRNA gene of two species of shrimps: sequence variability and secondary structure. Crustaceana 65:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maggioni R, Rogers AD, Maclean N, D’Incao F (2001) Molecular phylogeny of Western Atlantic Farfantepenaeus and Litopenaeus shrimp based on mitochondrial 16S partial sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 18:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Meyer A (1994) DNA technology and phylogeny of fish. In: Beaumont AR (ed) Genetics and the evolution of Aquatic Organisms Beaumont. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 219–249Google Scholar
  21. Palumbi SR, Benzie JAH (1991) Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar Penaeid shrimp. Mol Mar Biol Biotech 1:27–34Google Scholar
  22. Paugy D, Leveque C (1999) Taxinomie et systématique. In: Lévêque C, Paugy D (eds) Les poissons des eaux continentales africaines Diversité, écologie et utilisation par l’homme. Edition IRD, Paris, pp 97–119Google Scholar
  23. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarver SK, Silberman JD, Walsh PJ (1998) Mitochondrial DNA sequence evidence supporting the recognition of two subspecies or species of the Florida spiny lobster Panulirus argus. J Crustac Biol 18:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schubart CD, Neigel JE, Felder DL (2000) Use of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene for phylogenetic and population studies of Crustacea. Crustac Issues 12:817–830Google Scholar
  27. Sekino M, Hara M, Taniguchi N (2002) Loss of microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA variation in hatchery strains of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture 213:101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simon C, Franke A, Martin A (1991) The polymerase chain reaction: DNA extraction and amplification. In: Hewitt GM, Johnson AWB, Young JPW (eds) Molecular techniques in taxonomy. Hewitt, Berlin, pp 329–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Tong JG, Chan TY, Chu KH (2000) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of Metapenaeopsis (Decapoda: Penaeidae) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences of selected species from the Indo-West Pacific. J Crustac Biol 20:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsoi KH, Wang ZY, Chu KH (2005) Genetic divergence between two morphologically similar varieties of the kuruma shrimp Penaeus japonicas. Mar Biol 147:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tzeng TD, Yeh SY (1999) Analysis of the morphometric characters of the kuruma shrimp (Penaeus japonicus) in the East China Sea and the Taiwan Strait. Taipei J Fish Soc Taiwan 26:203–212Google Scholar
  34. Yu HP, Chan TY (1986) The illustrated penaeoid prawns of Taiwan. Southern Materials Center Inc, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  35. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeid Tamadoni Jahromi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ahmad Sofiman Othman
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rusly Rosazlina
    • 2
  1. 1.Persian Gulf and Oman Sea Ecology Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research InstituteAgricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)Bandar AbbasIran
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMindenMalaysia
  3. 3.Centre for Marine and Coastal StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMindenMalaysia

Personalised recommendations