Advertisement

Design of Individual Components of the Prosthesis for Revision Hip Replacement

  • O. K. Chegurov
  • E. N. OvchinnikovEmail author
  • M. V. Stogov
  • O. V. Kolchev
  • R. B. Shutov
  • N. V. Gorodnova
Article
  • 5 Downloads

The number of cases with extensive and complex bone defects undergoing revision endoprosthetization continues to increase. We tested a reendoprosthetization method for hip joints with severe bone tissue deficits using individualized endoprosthesis components in four patients. Clinical data showed that use of a personalized approach to reendoprosthetization of hip joints with severe bone tissue deficit provided complete filling of defects in the acetabulum.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Park, B., Liporace, F., and Marwin, S., “Managing acetabular defects in total hip arthroplasty,” Bull. Hosp. Jt. Dis., 75, No. 1, 37-46 (2017).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shon, W. Y., Santhanam, S. S., and Choi, J. W., “Acetabular reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty,” Hip Pelvis, 28, No. 1, 1-14 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Villatte, G., Erivan, R., Salles, G., Pereira, B., Galvin, M., Descamps, S., and Boisgard, S., “Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients,” Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res., 103, No. 4, 543-548 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abolghasemian, M., Sadeghi Naini, M., Tangsataporn, S., Lee, P., Backstein, D., Safir, O., Kuzyk, P., and Gross, A. E., “Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: An assessment of the graft’s ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision,” Bone Joint J., 96-B, No. 3, 319-324 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flecher, X., Appy, B., Parratte, S., Ollivier, M., and Argenson, J. N., “Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips,” Int. Orthop., 41, No. 5, 911-916 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenkins, D. R., Odland, A. N., Sierra, R. J., Hanssen, A. D., and Lewallen, D. G., “Minimum five-year outcomes with porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment construct in complex revision total hip arthroplasty,” J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 99, No. 10, e49 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waddell, B. S. and Della Valle, A. G., “Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component,” Bone Joint J., 99-B, No. 1, Supplement A, 25-30 (2017).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, C., Qin, L., Yan, W., Weng, X., and Huang, X., “Clinical evaluation following the use of mineralized collagen graft for bone defects in revision total hip arthroplasty,” Regen. Biomater., 2, No. 4, 245-249 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kostensalo, I., Seppänen, M., Virolainen, P., Mokka, J., Koivisto, M., and Mäkelä, K. T., “Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and cemented polyethylene socket in total hip revision arthroplasty,” Scand. J. Surg., 104, No. 4, 267-272 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garcia-Rey, E., Madero, R., and Garcia-Cimbrelo, E., “THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 473, No. 12, 3882-3891 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hourscht, C., Abdelnasser, M. K., Ahmad, S. S., Kraler, L., Keel, M. J., Siebenrock, K. A., and Klenke, F. M., “Reconstruction of AAOS type III and IV acetabular defects with the Ganz reinforcement ring: High failure in pelvic discontinuity,” Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 137, No. 8, 1139-1148 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brüggemann, A., Fredlund, E., Mallmin, H., and Hailer, N. P., “Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?,” Acta Orthop., 88, No. 1, 35-40 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jain, S., Grogan, R. J., and Giannoudis, P. V., “Options for man-aging severe acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty. A systematic review,” Hip Int., 24, No. 2, 109-122 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, H., Qu, X., Mao, Y., Dai, K., and Zhu, Z., “Custom acetabular cages offer stable fixation and improved hip scores for revision THA with severe bone defects,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 474, No. 3, 731-740 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mao, Y., Xu, C., Xu, J., Li, H., Liu, F., Yu, D., and Zhu, Z., “The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects,” Int. Orthop., 39, No. 10, 2023-2030 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berasi, C. C., 4th, Berend, K. R., Adams, J. B., Ruh, E. L., and Lombardi, A. V., Jr., “Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 473, No. 2, 528-535 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baauw, M., van Hellemondt, G. G., and Spruit, M. A., “Custom-made acetabular implant for Paprosky type 3 defects,” Orthopedics, 40, No. 1, e195-e198 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baauw, M., van Hellemondt, G. G., van Hooff, M. L., and Spruit, M., “The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip,” Bone Joint J., 97-B, No. 6, 780-785 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gubin, A. V., Kuznetsov, V. P., Borzunov, D. Yu., Koryukov, A. A., Reznik, A. V., and Chevardin, A. Yu., “Problems and perspectives in the introduction of customized implants made using additive technologies into traumatology and orthopedics,” Med. Tekh., No. 4, 52-55 (2016).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Esipova, A. A., “Use of geodesic domes in construction: Advantages and drawbacks,” Nauk Sovremen., No. 38, 8-11 (2015).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romanovich, A. N., “Geodesic domes. Characteristics of use and computations,” Sovremen. Innov., 8, No. 6, 22-23 (2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. K. Chegurov
    • 1
  • E. N. Ovchinnikov
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. V. Stogov
    • 1
  • O. V. Kolchev
    • 1
  • R. B. Shutov
    • 1
  • N. V. Gorodnova
    • 2
  1. 1.Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center for Restorative Traumatology and OrthopaedicsMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationKurganRussia
  2. 2.Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. YeltsinEkaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations