Advertisement

Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 326–330 | Cite as

The Hub of an External Fixation Device for Early Mobilization of the Wrist in the Treatment of Distal Radial Epimetaphyseal Fractures

  • G. Sh. GolubevEmail author
  • K. V. Petrov
Article

A mobilization hub inserted into an external fixator was developed for the treatment of fractures of the distal epimetaphysis of the radius bone. The hub was designed in a three-dimensional solid-body modeling system. Experimental prototypes were made of ABS plastic by 3D printing. Cadaver experiments showed that with the device carrying the mobilization hub, the range of movements was not statistically significantly different from the range of passive movements in the intact joint. The X-ray-transparent material used for the hub provides unimpeded visualization of the fracture site and wrist joint. Single use of the hub is proposed, as it can be made using inexpensive plastic and 3D printing, while batch production is by pressure casting.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Traumatology: National Guidelines [in Russian], G. P. Kotel’nikov and S. P. Mironov (eds.), GEOTAR-Media, Moscow (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharma, H. et al., “Outcomes and complications of fractures of distal radius (AO type B and C): Volar plating versus nonoperative treatment,” J. Orthop. Sci., 19, No. 4, 537-544 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wulf, C. A., Ackerman, D. B., and Rizzo, M., “Contemporary evaluation and treatment of distal radius fractures,” Hand Clin., 23, No. 2, 209-226 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franko, O. I., Zurakowski D., and Day C. S., “Functional disability of the wrist: Direct correlation with decreased wrist motion,” J. Hand Surg. Am., 33, No. 4, 485-492 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kapandzhi, A. I., “The upper limb,” in: Joint Physiology [in Russian], Abelev, G. and Kishinevskii, E. (eds.), Eksmo, Moscow (2017).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    An, K.-N., Berger, R. A., and Cooney, W. P., Biomechanics of the Wrist Joint, An, K.-N., Berger, R. A., and Cooney, W. P. (eds.), Springer, New York (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berger, R. A., “The anatomy and basic biomechanics of the wrist joint,” J. Hand Ther., 9, 84-93 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    The KUD-SAI-01 Rod Compression−Distraction Apparatus for Fixation of Small Tubular Bones [in Russian], http://cito-pro.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=170:kud-sai-01&catid=31:apparat&Itemid=55 (accessed: January 11, 2016).
  9. 9.
    Golubev, G. Sh. and Petrov, K. V., An Apparatus for the Treatment of Distal Radius Metaepiphyseal Fractures: RF Patent No. 17278 U1 [in Russian], Byul. 21.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palmer, A. K. and Werner, F. W., “Biomechanics of the distal radioulnar joint,” Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., No. 187, 26-35 (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agee, J. M. and King, F. C. Articulated Colles’ Fracture Splint: USA Patent No. 4611586 (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Drobetz, H. et al., “Volar locking distal radius plates show better short-term results than other treatment options: A prospective randomised controlled trial,” World J. Orthop., 7, No. 10, 687-694 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Song, J., Yu, A.-X., and Li, Z.-H., “Comparison of conservative and operative treatment for distal radius fracture: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials,” Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med., 8, No. 10, 17,023-17,035 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Navarro, C. M., Pettersson, H. J., and Enocson, A., “Complications after distal radius fracture surgery,” J. Orthop. Trauma, 29, No. 2, e36-e42 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Satake, H. et al., “Complications of distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate fixation,” Orthopedics, 39, No. 5, e893-e896 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thorninger, R. et al., “Complications of volar locking plating of distal radius fractures in 576 patients with 3.2 years follow-up,” Injury, 48, No. 6, 1104-1109 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shukla, R. et al., “External fixation versus volar locking plate for displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures: A prospective randomized comparative study of the functional outcomes,” J. Orthop. Traumatol., 15, No. 4, 265-270 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal State Autonomous Scientific Institution Research Institute SpetsvuzavtomatikaRostov-on-DonRussia
  2. 2.Regional State Hospital No. 2Rostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations