Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 427–431 | Cite as

A Robot-Assisted Mechanotherapy System for Remote Rehabilitation of Patients with Pathology of the Large Joints

  • O. V. Shelyakina
  • N. V. Mamonova
  • A. M. Aronov
  • N. P. Kareva
  • A. A. Kopanev
Article
  • 3 Downloads

A programmable system (PS) for robot-assisted mechanotherapy was developed for the rehabilitation of patients with diseases and traumas to the hip and knee joints. The medical device developed here differs from analogs in providing programming for remote control over the individual rehabilitation process in remote access conditions. Telemetric data recorded during rehabilitation training are stored in a remote information base for subsequent automated analysis, which provides for assessment of the effectiveness of the rehabilitation process and introduction of corrections to the rehabilitation program initially formulated for each patient. The interface of the information system is intuitive and does not require the user to have experience in working with personal computers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zakhar’yan, A. G., “Characteristics of primary disability in the population of the Novosibirsk district,” in: Medicine and Education in Siberia: an Online Scientific Publication [in Russian], No. 1 (2015); http://ngmu.ru/cozo/mos/article/text_full.php?id=1662.
  2. 2.
    Chikinova, L. N. and Boltenko, Zh. V., “State and dynamics of primary disability due to musculoskeletal system and connective tissue diseases in the Central Federal District,” Med.-Sots. Ekspert. Reabil., No. 4. 30-33 (2014).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salter, R. B., “The biological concept of continuous passive motion of synovial joint. The first eighteen years of basic research and its clinical implications,” Clin. Orthop., 242, 12-24 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lomtatidze, E. Sh., Markin, V. A., Saraev, A. V., et al., “Use of CPM therapy in patients after trauma and orthopedic surgery in out-patient practice,” Vestn. Poslediplom. Med. Obraz., No. 2, 31-33 (2012).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ryabchikov, I. V., Pankov, I. O., and Ryabchikova, E. N., “Passive mechanotherapy in the treatment of patients with combined trauma during the recovery period,” Byull. VSNTs SO RAMN, Supplement No. 4, 94 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Levinger, G. M., Lythgo, N., Cimoli, C., et al., “Targeted home and center-based exercise program for people after total hip replacement: A randomized clinical trial,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 89, 442-1447 (2008).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Unlu, E., Eksioglu, E., Aydog, E. G., et al., “The effect of exercise on hip muscle strength, gait speed and cadence in patients with total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled study,” Clin. Rehabil., 21, 706-711 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pimanchev, O. V., Brizhan’, L. K., Buryachenko, B. P., et al., “Prolonged CPM therapy in the rehabilitation of patients after total endoprosthetization of the knee joint,” Voenno-Med. Zh., No. 8, 52-53 (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang, N. J., Lin, C. C., Li, C. F., et al., “The combined effects of continuous passive motion treatment and acellular PLGA implants on osteochondral regeneration in the rabbit,” Biomaterials, 33, No. 11, 3153-3163 (2012); http://research.ncku.edu.tw/re/commentary/e/20121228/1.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steadman, R. J., Briggs, K. K., Rodrigo, J. J., et al., “Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: Average 11-year follow-up,” Arthroscopy, 19, No. 5, 477-484 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chernikova, O. M., Sidorova, G. V., Arsent’eva, N. I., et al., “Potential for improvements in the rehabilitation of patients with the sequelae of trauma and musculoskeletal diseases at the regional level,” Med.-Sots. Ekspert. Reabil., No. 3, 6-8 (2012).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peiris, C. L., Taylor, N. F., and Shields, N., “Patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation for lower limb orthopedic conditions do much less physical activity than recommended in guidelines for healthy older adults: An observational study,” J. Physiother., 59, No, 1, 39-44 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filonenko, B. F., Filonenko, A. B., Shelyakina, O. V., and Mamonova, N. V., “An apparatus rehabilitation of the knee and hip joints,” Russian Federation P.m. 148127, MPK A61N 1/02(01); Applicant and Patentholder OOO Innovatory Rehabilitation Technologies, Filonenko, B. F., No. 2014132258/14, applied August 5, 2014; published November 27, 1014, Byul. No. 33 (2006).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roos, E., Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement,” Curr. Opin. Rheumatol., 15, 160-162 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. V. Shelyakina
    • 1
  • N. V. Mamonova
    • 2
  • A. M. Aronov
    • 3
  • N. P. Kareva
    • 4
  • A. A. Kopanev
    • 1
  1. 1.Ya. L. Tsyv’yan Novosibirsk Science Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.OOO InnortaNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.AO Innovatory Medical Technological Center (Medical Technopark)NovosibirskRussia
  4. 4.Novosibirsk State Medical InstituteMinistry of Health of the Russian FederationNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations