Advertisement

BioControl

pp 1–10 | Cite as

The gregarious parasitoid Cotesia flavipes displays a high level of preadaptation to a novel host, Diatraea indigenella

  • C. Londoño-Sánchez
  • J. Montoya-Lerma
  • J. P. Michaud
  • G. VargasEmail author
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is often augmented against Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) stem borers in the Americas. Diatraea indigenella Dyar and Heinrich, an endemic pest of sugarcane in southern Colombia, represents a novel host for C. flavipes. We examined the development of C. flavipes on D. indigenella and D. saccharalis, a familiar host, when larvae were stung by one, two or three wasps. Host species had no effect on parasitism success, immature parasitoid mortality, parasitoid developmental time, adult emergence, or female size. Superparasitized D. indigenella hosts yielded more cocoons, more adults, and more female wasps than those parasitized with a single sting, or from D. saccharalis hosts. However, wasp survival and longevity declined when host larvae were stung three times. Thus, D. indigenella was a more suitable host for C. flavipes when superparasitized, and appears suitable for augmentation against this emergent pest and other Diatraea species attacking sugarcane.

Keywords

Braconidae Crambidae Diatraea saccharalis Morphometry Superparasitism Sugarcane 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the personnel of the Entomology laboratory at Cenicaña for technical support and for supplying Diatraea larvae, to Laboratorios Biocol S.A.S for supplying the parasitoids, to the Bioagro laboratory for logistical support, and to Héctor Alberto Chica for assistance with statistical analysis. We also thank Fred Hollingworth for editorial contributions and to anonymous reviewers who help improved this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there are no conflict of interest (financial or non-financial) that research funds were provided by the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center, a private non for-profit institution. Any mention of trade names, commercial products and/or private companies in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center or the Universidad del Valle.

Ethical approval

The authors declare this is an original research that was carry out under professional conduct and no simultaneous attempts of submission were carried out.

References

  1. Aldrich JR (1995) Testing the “new associations” biological control concept with a tachinid parasitoid (Euclytia flava). J Chem Ecol 7:1031–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alleyne M, Beckage NE (1997) Parasitism-induced effects on host growth and metabolic efficiency in tobacco hornworm larvae parasitized by Cotesia congregata. J Inst Physiol 43:407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arakaki N, Gahana Y (1986) Emergence pattern and mating behavior of Apanteles flavipes (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Appl Entomol Zool 21:382–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aya VM, Echeverri C, Barrera G, Vargas G (2017) Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a biological control agent of sugarcane stem borers in Colombia’s Cauca River Valley. Fla Entomol 100:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aya VM, Montoya-Lerma J, Echeverri-Rubiano C, Michaud JP, Vargas G (2019) Host resistance to two parasitoids (Diptera: Tachinidae) helps explain a regional outbreak of novel Diatraea spp. stem borers (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Colombia sugarcane. Biol Control 129:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badilla F (2002) A successful program of biological control of insect pests of sugarcane in Costa Rica. Man Integr Plagas Agroecol 64:77–87 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  7. Barrera GP, Villamizar LF, Espinel C, Quintero EM, Belaich MN, Toloza DL, Ghiringhelli PD, Vargas G (2017) Identification of Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) based on cytochrome oxidase II. PloS ONE 12(9):e0184053PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Botelho PS (1992) Fifteen years of biological control of Diatraea saccharalis using parasitoids. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 27:255–262 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  9. Dorn S, Beckage N (2007) Superparasitism in gregarious hymenopteran parasitoids: ecological, behavioural and physiological perspectives. Physiol Entomol 32:199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupas S, Gitau CW, Branca A, Le Rü BP, Silvain JF (2008) Evolution of a polydnavirus gene in relation to parasitoid-host species immune resistance. J Hered 5:491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gifford JR, Mann GA (1967) Biology, rearing and a trial release of Apanteles flavipes in the Florida Everglades to control sugarcane borer. J Econ Entomol 60:44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu H, Wang Q, Dorn S (2003) Superparasitism in Cotesia glomerata: response of hosts and consequences for parasitoids. Ecol Entomol 28:422–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Heimpel GE, Rosenheim JA (1998) Egg limitation in parasitoids: a review of the evidence and a case study. Biol Control 11:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson CF, Tilton EW (1955) Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J Econ Entomol 48:157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hokkannen HMT, Pimentel D (1984) New approach for selecting biological control agents. Can Entomol 116:1109–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linares BA, Ferrer F (1990) Introduction of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for control of Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Venezuela. Caña Azúcar 8:5–11 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  18. Macedo N, Mendonça Filho AF, Moreno JA, Pinazza AH (1984) Evaluation of the economic advantages of 10 years of biological control of Diatraea spp. through Apanteles flavipes Cameron, in the State of Alagoas (Brazil). J Entomol Newsl 16:9–10Google Scholar
  19. Mahmoud AMA, De Luna Santillana EJ, Rodríguez Pérez MA (2011) Parasitism by the endoparasitoid, Cotesia flavipes induces cellular immunosuppression and enhances susceptibility of the sugar cane borer, Diatraea saccharalis to Bacillus thuringiensis. J Inst Sci 11:1–15Google Scholar
  20. Mahmoud AMA, De Luna Santillana EJ, Guo X, Reyes Villanueva F, Rodríguez Pérez MA (2012) Development of the braconid wasp Cotesia flavipes in two crambids, Diatraea saccharalis and Eoreuma loftini: evidence of host developmental disruption. J Asia-Pac Entomol 15:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michaud JP, Browning HW (1999) Seasonal abundance of the brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) and its natural enemies in Puerto Rico. Fla Entomol 82:424–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muirhead KA, Murphy NP, Sallam MN, Donnellan SC, Austin AD (2006) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the Cotesia flavipes complex of parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ann Soc Entomol Fr 63:904–914Google Scholar
  23. Muirhead K, Austin A, Sallam M (2008) The systematics of Cotesia nonagriae (Oliff) stat. rev. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae), a newly recognized member of the Cotesia flavipes complex. Zootaxa 1846:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakamatsu Y, Kuriya K, Harvey JA, Tanaka T (2006) Influence of nutrient deficiency caused by host developmental arrest on the growth and development of a koinobiont parasitoid. J Inst Physiol 52:1005–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Overholt WA, Ochieng JO, Lammers PM, Ogedah K (1994) Rearing and field release methods for Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of tropical gramineous stemborers. Inst Sci Appl 15:253–259Google Scholar
  26. Persad AB, Hoy MA (2003) Manipulation of female parasitoid age enhances laboratory culture of Lysiphlebus testaceipes (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) reared on Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae). Fla Entomol 86:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Postali JR, Machado PS, Pinto A (2010) Biological control of pests as a key component for sustainable sugarcane production. In: Cortez LAB (ed) Sugarcane bioethanol R&D for productivity and sustainability. Blucher Brazilian Science and Technology, São Paulo, pp 441–450Google Scholar
  28. Potting RPJ, Snellen HM, Vet LEM (1997a) Fitness consequences of superparasitism and the mechanisms of host discrimination in the stemborer parasitoid Cotesia flavipes. Entomol Exp Appl 82:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Potting RPJ, Vet LEM, Overholt WA (1997b) Geographical variation in host selection and reproductive success in the stem borer parasitoid Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bull Entomol Res 87:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabinovich JE, Jorda MT, Bernstein C (2000) Local mate competition and precise sex ratios in Telenomus fariai (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a parasitoid of triatomine eggs. Behav Ecol Soc 48:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodríguez V, Chavarría L, Gómez I, Peñaloza Y, Tejada M (2004) Development of the parasitoid Cotesia flavipes Cámeron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Diatraea tabernella Dyar and Diatraea saccharalis F. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and its effectiveness in controlling Diatraea tabernella. Tecnociencia 6(1):85–94 (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  32. Sallam MN, Overholt WA, Kairu E (2001) Dispersal of the exotic parasitoid Cotesia flavipes in a new ecosystem. Entomol Exp Appl 98:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santolomazza-Carbone S, Cordero A (2003) Superparasitism and sex ratio adjustment in a wasp parasitoid: results at variance with local mate competition? Oecologia 136:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SAS Institute (2011) SAS vers. 9.3. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  35. Solis MA, Metz MA (2016) An illustrated guide to the identification of the known species of Diatraea Guilding (Lepidoptera, Crambidae, Crambinae) based on genitalia. ZooKeys 565:73–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Alphen JJM, Visser ME (1990) Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol 35:59–79PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Vargas G, Lastra LA, Solis MA (2013) First record of Diatraea tabernella (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in the Cauca River Valley of Colombia. Fla Entomol 96:1198–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vargas G, Gómez LA, Michaud JP (2015) Sugarcane stem borers of the Colombian Cauca River Valley: current pest status, biology, and control. Fla Entomol 98:728–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vargas G, Lastra LA, Ramírez GD, Solis MA (2018) The Diatraea complex (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Colombia’s Cauca River Valley: making a case for the geographically localized approach. Neotrop Entomol 47:395–402PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Weir EH, Contreras W, Gil de Weir K (2007) Biological control of Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in sugarcane crops in central Venezuela. Rev Biol Trop 55:655–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. White WH, Miller JD, Milligan SB, Burner DM, Legendre BL (2001) Inheritance of sugarcane borer resistance in sugarcane derived from two measures of insect damage. Crop Sci 41:1706–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiedenmann RN, Smith JW, Darnell PO (1992) Laboratory rearing and biology of the parasite Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) using Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as a host. Environ Entomol 21:1160–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Organization for Biological Control (IOBC) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Londoño-Sánchez
    • 1
  • J. Montoya-Lerma
    • 1
  • J. P. Michaud
    • 2
  • G. Vargas
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversidad del ValleCaliColombia
  2. 2.Department of EntomologyKansas State University, Agricultural Research Center-HaysHaysUSA
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia (Cenicaña)CaliColombia

Personalised recommendations