Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 154–167 | Cite as

Nurturing Our Better Nature: A Proposal for Cognitive Integrity as a Foundation for Autonomous Living

  • Eugenia I. GorlinEmail author
  • Reinier Schuur
Original Research

Abstract

As we account for the genetic and environmental influences on morally-relevant character traits like intellectual honesty, industriousness, and self-control, do we risk becoming ever less accountable to ourselves? Behavioral genetic research suggests that about half the variance in such character traits is likely attributable to heredity, and a small fraction to the shared family environment. The remaining 40–60% is explained by neither genes nor family upbringing. This raises the question: how active a role can individuals play in shaping their own character? What, if anything, can and should one do to take responsibility for the kind of person one becomes? This paper sketches a novel theoretical proposal for addressing these questions, by drawing on several previously disparate lines of research within behavior genetics, philosophy, and experimental psychology. Our core proposal concerns the metacognitive capacity to engage in active, reality-based cognition, as opposed to passive, stimulus-driven processing or an active pretense at cognition (i.e., self-deception). We review arguments and evidence indicating that human beings both can and should exercise this capacity, which we have termed “cognitive integrity.” We argue that doing so can in a certain sense “set us free” of our genetic and environmental influences—not by rendering them irrelevant, but by giving us the awareness and motivation to manage them more responsibly. This perspective has important implications for guiding the development of psychosocial interventions, and for informing how we direct ourselves more generally, both as individuals and as a society.

Keywords

Moral development Heritability Free will Cognitive control Metacognition Moral identity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Templeton Foundation via a Genetics and Human Agency junior investigator award to Dr. Gorlin. We also wish to thank associate editor Dr. Peter Zachar and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback, and Dr. Eric Turkheimer for heading the Genetics and Human Agency initiative. We are also grateful to Drs. Colin DeYoung and Jonathan Livengood for their helpful comments on a conference presentation that preceded this manuscript, and to Drs. Benjamin Bayer, Matthew Bateman, Boris Hanin, and others who have lent their insights and general moral support to this project.

Funding

This study was funded by the Templeton Foundation (via a Genetics and Human Agency junior investigator award).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors Gorlin and Schuur both declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Adamson SJ, Sellman JD, Frampton CM (2009) Patient predictors of alcohol treatment outcome: a systematic review. J Subst Abuse Treat 36:75–86Google Scholar
  2. Alloy LB, Abramson LY (1988) Depressive realism: four theoretical perspectives. In: Alloy LB (ed) Cognitive processes in depression. Guilford Press, New York, pp 223–265Google Scholar
  3. Alquist JL, Ainsworth SE, Baumeister RF (2013) Determined to conform: disbelief in free will increases conformity. J Exp Soc Psychol 49(1):80–86Google Scholar
  4. Armour S, Haynie DL (2007) Adolescent sexual debut and later delinquency. J Youth Adolesc 36:141–152Google Scholar
  5. Asbury K, Almeida D, Hibel J, Harlaar N, Plomin R (2008) Clones in the classroom: a daily diary study of the nonshared environmental relationship between monozygotic twin differences in school experience and achievement. Twin Res Hum Genet 11(6):586–595Google Scholar
  6. Audi R (2001) Doxastic voluntarism and the ethics of belief. In: Steup M (ed) Knowledge, truth and duty. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 93–114Google Scholar
  7. Badhwar NK (2014) Well-being: happiness in a worthwhile life. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargh JA (1994) The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer RS, Jr TKS (eds) Handbook of social cognition, vol 1: basic processes; vol 2: applications, (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  9. Barlow DH, Allen LB, Choate ML (2004) Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders. Behav Ther 35(2):205–230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80036-4 Google Scholar
  10. Baumeister R, Brewer LE (2012) Believing versus disbelieving in free will: correlates and consequences. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 6(10):736–745Google Scholar
  11. Bear A (2016) What neuroscience says about free will. Scientific American: MIND Guest Blog. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/mind-guest-blog/what-neuroscience-says-about-free-will/. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
  12. Beaver KM, Wright JP, DeLisi M, Vaughn MG (2008) Genetic influences on the stability of low self-control: results from a longitudinal sample of twins. J Crim Justice 36(6):478–485Google Scholar
  13. Beck AT (1976) Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press, Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  14. Beck AT (1991) Cognitive therapy: a 30-year retrospective. Am Psychol 46:368–375Google Scholar
  15. Beck AT, Freeman A, Davis DD (2004) Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Benner AD, Kretsch N, Harden KP, Crosnoe R (2014) Academic achievement as a moderator of genetic influences on alcohol use in adolescence. Dev Psychol 50(4):1170–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035227 Google Scholar
  17. Bevilacqua L, Goldman D (2013) Genetics of impulsive behaviour. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120380.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0380 Google Scholar
  18. Binswanger H (1991) Volition as cognitive self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):165–178Google Scholar
  19. Binswanger H (2014) How We Know: epistemology on an objectivist foundation. TOF Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, Segal ZV, Abbey S, Speca M, Velting D, Devins G (2004) Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 11:230–241Google Scholar
  21. Black DS, Sussman S, Unger JB (2010) A further look at the intergenerational transmission of violence: witnessing interparental violence in emerging adulthood. J Interpersonal Violence 25(6):1022–1042Google Scholar
  22. Bogler C, Vowinkel A, Zhutovsky P, Haynes J-D (2017) Default network activity is associated with better performance in a vigilance task. Front Hum Neurosci 11:623.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00623 Google Scholar
  23. Borge (2003) The myth of self-deception. South J Philos 41:1–28Google Scholar
  24. Borkovec TD, Alcaine O, Behar ES (2004) Avoidance theory of worry and generalized anxiety disorder. In: Heimberg R, Mennin D, Turk C (eds) Generalized anxiety disorder: advances in research and practice. Guilford Press, New York, pp 77–108Google Scholar
  25. Boyd JE, Lanius RA, McKinnon MC (2018) Mindfulness-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a review of the treatment literature and neurobiological evidence. J Psychiatry Neurosci 43(1):7–25.  https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.170021 Google Scholar
  26. Chadwick P (2014) Mindfulness for psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 204(5):333–334Google Scholar
  27. Chance Z, Norton MI, Gino F, Ariely D (2011) Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(3):15655–15659Google Scholar
  28. Chisholm R (1964) Human freedom and the self. The lindley lectures, University of Kansas, Kansas CityGoogle Scholar
  29. Chisholm R (1976) Person and object. Open Court, LaSalleGoogle Scholar
  30. Chivers T (2010) Neuroscience, free will and determinism: “I’m just a machine”. The Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/8058541/Neuroscience-free-will-and-determinism-Im-just-a-machine.html
  31. Clifford WK (1877/1999) The ethics of belief. In: Madigan T (ed) The ethics of belief and other essays. Prometheus Books, Amherst, New York, pp 70–96Google Scholar
  32. Code L (1987) Epistemic responsibility. University Press of New England, HanoverGoogle Scholar
  33. Cohen GL, Aronson J, Steele CM (2000) When beliefs yield to evidence: reducing biased evaluation by affirming the self. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 26(9):1151–1164Google Scholar
  34. Craske MG, Pontillo DC (2001) Cognitive biases in anxiety disorders and their effect on cognitive-behavioral treatment. Bull Menninger Clin 65(1):58–77Google Scholar
  35. Dar-Nimrod I, Heine SJ (2011) Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychol Bull 137(5):800–818.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021860 Google Scholar
  36. Dennett D (1984) I could not have done otherwise—so what? J Philos 81(10):553–567Google Scholar
  37. Dennett D (2003) Freedom evolves. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Dickerson FB (2004) Update on cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for schizophrenia: review of recent studies. J Cognitive Psychother 18(3):189–205Google Scholar
  39. Dogan A, Morishima Y, Heise F, Tanner C, Gibson R, Wagner AF, Tobler PN (2016) Prefrontal connections express individual differences in intrinsic resistance to trading off honesty values against economic benefits. Sci Rep 6:12Google Scholar
  40. Elliott C (2002) Who holds the leash? Am J Bioeth 2(2):48Google Scholar
  41. Evans JS, Stanovich KE (2013) Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(3):223–241.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685 Google Scholar
  42. Fischer JM, Ravizza M (1998) Responsibility and control. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Frankfurt H (1969) Alternate possibilities and moral responsibility. J Philos 66:829–839Google Scholar
  44. Frankfurt H (1982) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In: Watson G (ed) Free will, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 81–95Google Scholar
  45. Franklin ME, Foa EB (1998) Cognitive-behavioral treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder. In: Gorman JM (ed) A guide to treatments that work. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 339–357Google Scholar
  46. Franklin MS, Mrazek MD, Anderson CL, Johnston C, Smallwood J, Kingstone A, Schooler JW (2016) Tracking Distraction. J Attention Dis 21(6):475–486Google Scholar
  47. Friedman NP, Miyake A, Young SE, DeFries JC, Corley RP, Hewitt JK (2008) Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. J Exp Psychol Gen 137(2):201–225.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201 Google Scholar
  48. Gawrilow C, Morgenroth K, Schultz R, Oettingen G, Gollwitzer P (2013) Inducing self-regulation of goal pursuit increases self-discipline in school children at risk and not at risk for ADHD. Motiv Emot 37:134–145Google Scholar
  49. Ghate O (2016) A being of self-made soul. In: Gotthelf A, Salmieri G (eds) A companion to Ayn Rand. Blackwell companions to philosophy, Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. Gibson R, Tanner C, Wagner AF (2013) Preferences for truthfulness: heterogeneity among and within individuals. Am Econ Rev 103:532–548Google Scholar
  51. Ginet C (2001) Deciding to believe. In: Steup M (ed) Knowledge, truth, and duty. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 63–76Google Scholar
  52. Ginet C (2014) Can an indeterministic cause leave a choice up to the agent? In: David P (ed.) Libertarian free will: contemporary debates. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 15–26Google Scholar
  53. Ginet C (2016) Reasons explanation: further defense of a non-causal account. J Ethics 20:219–228Google Scholar
  54. Gino F, Schweitzer ME, Mead NL, Ariely D (2011) Unable to resist temptation: how self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 115(2):191–203Google Scholar
  55. Gordon MS, Tonge B, Melvin GA (2011) Outcome of adolescent depression: 6 months after treatment. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 45:232–239Google Scholar
  56. Gorlin EI, Lombrozo T (2018a) Nurturing our better nature: epistemic integrity as a foundation for autonomous living. In Colin DeYoung (Chair), Free Will and Determinism. Symposium talk presented at annual meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, BostonGoogle Scholar
  57. Gorlin EI, Lombrozo T (2018b) Good thinking can be cultivated by choice: implications for epistemic responsibility and moral agency. Poster accepted for presentation at annual meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  58. Gorlin EI, Otto MW (2018) Truth matters: cognitive integrity as a proposed intervention for self-deception.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/72h65
  59. Gorlin EI, Teachman BA (2014) Inhibitory control as a moderator of threat-related interference biases in social anxiety. Cogn Emot 26:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.931275 Google Scholar
  60. Gorlin EI, Teachman BA (2015) Threat interference biases predict socially anxious behavior: moderation by inhibitory control and minute of stressor. Behav Ther 46:493–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2015.03.001 Google Scholar
  61. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  62. Griffin A (2016) Free will could all be an illusion, scientists suggest after study shows choice may just be brain tricking itself. Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/free-will-could-all-be-an-illusion-scientists-suggest-after-study-that-shows-choice-could-just-be-a7008181.html
  63. Griffith M (2010) Why agent-caused actions are not lucky. Am Philos Q 47:43–56Google Scholar
  64. Hafenbrack AC, Kinias Z, Barsade SG (2014) Debiasing the mind through meditation: mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychol Sci 25(2):369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613503853 Google Scholar
  65. Handmaker NS, Hester RK, Delaney H (1999) Videotaped training in alcohol counseling for obstetric care practitioners: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 93(2):213–218Google Scholar
  66. Harburg E, Davis DR, Caplan R (1982) Parent and offspring alcohol use; imitative and aversive transmission. J Stud Alcohol 43:497–516Google Scholar
  67. Harburg E, DiFranceisco W, Webster DW, Gleiberman L, Schork A (1990) Familial transmission of alcohol use: II. Imitation of and aversion to parent drinking (1960) by adult offspring (1977)—Tecumseh. Mich J Stud Alcohol 51:245–256Google Scholar
  68. Harris KM, Halpern CT, Smolen A, Haberstick BC (2006) The national longitudinal study of adolescent health (Add Health) twin data. Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6):988–997Google Scholar
  69. Heil J (1983) Doxastic agency. Philos Stud 43:355–364Google Scholar
  70. Hieronymi P (2006) Controlling attitudes. Pac Philos Q 87:45–74Google Scholar
  71. Hill PL, Roberts BW (2011) The role of adherence in the relationship between conscientiousness and perceived health. Health Psychol 30:797–804Google Scholar
  72. Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A (2012) The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res 36(5):427–440Google Scholar
  73. Hoorelbeke K, Koster EHW (2017) Internet-delivered cognitive control training as a preventive intervention for remitted depressed patients: evidence from a double-blind randomized controlled trial study. J Consult Clin Psychol 85:135–146Google Scholar
  74. Houben K, Jansen A (2011) Training inhibitory control: a recipe for resisting sweet temptations. Appetite 56:345–349Google Scholar
  75. Jacobson KC, Rowe DC (1999) Genetic and environmental influences on the relationships between family connectedness, school connectedness, and adolescent depressed mood. Dev Psychol 35:926–939Google Scholar
  76. Jaeggi SM, Berman MG, Jonides J (2009) Training attentional processes. Trends Cogn Sci 13(5):191–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.002 Google Scholar
  77. James W (1914) Talks to teachers on psychology: and to students on some of life’s ideals. Henry Holt and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Vernon PA (1996) Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. J Pers 64(3):577–591Google Scholar
  79. Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Vernon PA (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality Individ Differ 33(1):83–101Google Scholar
  80. Joormann J, Teachman BA, Gotlib IH (2009) Sadder and less accurate? false memory for negative material in depression. J Abnorm Psychol 118(2):412–417Google Scholar
  81. Kabat-Zinn J (1982) An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 4:33–47Google Scholar
  82. Kabat-Zinn J (1990) Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your mind to face stress, pain and illness. Dell, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  83. Kane R (1996) The significance of free will. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  84. Kar N (2011) Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder: a review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 7:167–181Google Scholar
  85. Kendler KS (2013) Decision making in the pathway from genes to psychiatric and substance use disorders. Mol Psychiatry 18(6):640–645Google Scholar
  86. Koole SL, Smeets K, Van Knippenberg A, Dijksterhuis A (1999) The cessation of rumination through self-affirmation. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(1):111Google Scholar
  87. Kraut R (2012) Aristotle on becoming good: habituation, reflection, and perception. In: Shields C (ed) Oxford Handbook on Aristotle. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Krueger RF, South S, Johnson W, Iacono W (2008) The heritability of personality is not always 50%: gene-environment interactions and correlations between personality and parenting. J Pers 76(6):1485–1521Google Scholar
  89. Lanius RA (2015) Trauma-related dissociation and altered states of consciousness: a call for clinical, treatment, and neuroscience research. Eur J Psychotraumatol.  https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v6.27905.10.3402/ejpt.v6.27905 Google Scholar
  90. Larsson H, Chang Z, D’Onofrio BM, Lichtenstein P (2014) The heritability of clinically diagnosed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Psychol Med 44(10):2223–2229.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713002493 Google Scholar
  91. Levy N (2011) Addiction and compulsion. In: O’Connor T, Sandis C (eds) A companion to the philosophy of action. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 267–273Google Scholar
  92. Luciano M, Wainwright MA, Wright MJ, Martin NG (2006) The heritability of conscientiousness facets and their relationship to IQ and academic achievement. Personality Individ Differ 40(6):1189–1199Google Scholar
  93. Lutz A, Slagter HA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ (2008) Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn Sci 12(4):163–169Google Scholar
  94. Marcus MT, Zgierska A (2009) Mindfulness-based therapies for substance use disorders: part 1 (editorial). Subst Abuse 30(4):263.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070903250027 Google Scholar
  95. McHugh RK, Hearon BA, Otto MW (2010) Cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 33(3):511–525Google Scholar
  96. Mele A (1990) Irresistible desires. Nous 24(3):455–472Google Scholar
  97. Mele A (2001) Real self-deception. Behav Brain Sci 20:91–102Google Scholar
  98. Miller WR, Rollnick S (1991) Preparing people to change addictive behavior. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Mitchell JT, Zylowska L, Kollins SH (2015) Mindfulness meditation training for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adulthood: current empirical support, treatment overview, and future directions. Cogn Behav Pract 22(2):172–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.10.002 Google Scholar
  100. Montmarquet J (1992) Epistemic virtue. In: Jonathan D, Ernest S (eds) A companion to epistemology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  101. Moore MT, Fresco DM (2007) Depressive realism and attributional style: implications for individuals at risk for depression. Behav Ther 38(2):144–154Google Scholar
  102. Moulds ML, Kandris E, Starr S, Wong AC (2007) The relationship between rumination, avoidance and depression in a non-clinical sample. Behav Res Ther 45(2):251–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.03.003 Google Scholar
  103. Newman MG, Llera SJ (2011) A novel theory of experiential avoidance in generalized anxiety disorder: a review and synthesis of research supporting a contrast avoidance model of worry. Clin Psychol Rev 31(3):371–382Google Scholar
  104. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J, Fredrickson BL (1993) Response styles and the duration of episodes of depressed mood. J Abnorm Psychol 102(1):20–28.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.102.1.20 Google Scholar
  105. Nussbaum M (2001) Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  106. O’Connor T (2002) Persons and causes: the metaphysics of free will. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  107. O’Connor T (2016) Free will. In: Zalta ZN (ed.).The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Summer 2016 edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/freewill/. Accessed 21 Jul 2018
  108. Paul S (2015) Doxastic self-control. Am Philos Q 52(2):145–158Google Scholar
  109. Paulhus DL, Reid DB (1991) Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. J Pers Soc Psychol 60:307–317Google Scholar
  110. Pereboom D (2005) Defending hard incompatibilism. Midwest Stud Philos 29:228–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.2005.00114.x Google Scholar
  111. Pereboom D (2008) A hard-line reply to the multiple-case manipulation argument. Philos Phenomenol Res 77(1):160–170.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00192.x Google Scholar
  112. Pickard H (2013) Psychopathology and the ability to do otherwise. Philos Phenomenol Res  https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12025 Google Scholar
  113. Pickard H (2016) Denial in addiction. Mind Lang 31(3):277–299Google Scholar
  114. Plomin R (2011) Commentary: why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment three decades later. Int J Epidemiol 40(3):582–592.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq144 Google Scholar
  115. Plomin R, Daniels D (1987) Why are children in the same family so different from each other? Behav Brain Sci 10:1–16Google Scholar
  116. Plomin R, Asbury K, Dunn J (2001) Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later. Can J Psychiatry 46:225–233Google Scholar
  117. Pollock JL (1991) OSCAR: a general theory of rationality. In: Cummins J, Pollock JL (eds) Philosophy and AI: essays at the interface. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 189–213Google Scholar
  118. Powers MB, Smits JAJ, Whitley D, Bystritsky A, Telch MJ (2008) The effect of attributional processes concerning medication taking on return of fear. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:478–490Google Scholar
  119. Prapavessis H, Grove JR, Maddison R, Zillmann N (2003) Self-handicapping tendencies, coping, and anxiety responses among athletes. Psychol Sport Exerc 4(4):357–375Google Scholar
  120. Pratt TC, Cullen FT (2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology 38:931–964Google Scholar
  121. Regnerus MD (2007) Forbidden fruit: sex & religion in the lives of American teenagers. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  122. Reid T (1983/1788) Inquiry and essays. Hackett Publishing Company, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  123. Rhee SH, Waldman ID (2002) Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Bull 128:490–529Google Scholar
  124. Rheins JG (2016) Objectivist metaphysics: the primacy of existence. In: Gotthelf A, Salmieri G (eds) A companion to Ayn Rand. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  125. Rigoni D, Kühn S, Gaudino G, Sartori G, Brass M (2012) Reducing self-control by weakening belief in free will. Conscious Cogn 21(3):1482–1490Google Scholar
  126. Roberts BW, Chernyshenko O, Stark S, Goldberg L (2005) The structure of conscientiousness: an empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Pers Psychol 58:103–139.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x Google Scholar
  127. Rogers CR (1957) A therapist’s view of the good life: the fully functioning person. Humanist 17(5):291Google Scholar
  128. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78Google Scholar
  129. Sahranc Ü (2011) An investigation of the relationships between self-handicapping and depression, anxiety, and stress. Int Online J Educ Sci 3(2):526–540Google Scholar
  130. Salmieri G, Bayer B (2014) How we choose our beliefs. Philosophia 42:41–53Google Scholar
  131. Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) (2001) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  132. Searle J (2010) Rationality in Action. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  133. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD (2002) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach for preventing relapse. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  134. Seli P, Risko EF, Smilek D, Schacter DL (2016) Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends Cogn Sci 20(8):605–617Google Scholar
  135. Sharples R (2007) Alexander of aphrodisias on fate. Duckworth Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  136. Sheldon KM, Elliot AJ (1998) Not all personal goals are personal: comparing autonomous and controlling goals on effort and attainment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 24:546–557Google Scholar
  137. Sheldon KM, Schachtman T (2007) Obligations, internalization, and excuse making: integrating the triangle model and self-determination theory. J Pers 75:359–381Google Scholar
  138. Sherman DK, Kim HS (2002) Affective perseverance: the resistance of affect to cognitive invalidation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28(2):224–237Google Scholar
  139. Sherman DA, Nelson LD, Steele CM (2000) Do messages about health risks threaten the self? Increasing the acceptance of threatening health messages via self-affirmation. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 26(9):1046–1058Google Scholar
  140. Shu LL, Mazar N, Gino F, Ariely D, Bazerman MH (2011) When to sign on the dotted line?: signing first makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  141. Stanovich KE (2002) Rationality, intelligence, and levels of analysis in cognitive science: is dysrationalia possible? In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Why smart people can be so stupid. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 124–158Google Scholar
  142. Steup M (2011) Belief, voluntariness and intentionality. Dialectica 65(4):537–559Google Scholar
  143. Stichter M (2013) Virtues as skills in virtue epistemology. J Philos Res 38:333–348Google Scholar
  144. Strawson G (1994) The impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. Philos Stud 75(1–2):5–24Google Scholar
  145. Street MD, Douglas SC, Geiger SW, Martinko MJ (2001) The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process: the cognitive elaboration model. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 86:256–277Google Scholar
  146. Tang Y-Y, Posner MI (2009) Attention training and attention state training. Trends Cogn Sci 13(5):222–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.009 Google Scholar
  147. Turkheimer E (2011) Genetics and human agency: comment on Dar-Nimrod and Heine (2011). Psychol Bull 137(5):825–828.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024306 Google Scholar
  148. Turkheimer E, Waldron M (2000) Nonshared environment: a theoretical, methodological, and quantitative review. Psychol Bull 126:78–108Google Scholar
  149. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Google Scholar
  150. Udry JR (2003) The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health), Waves I & II, 1994–1996; Wave III, 2001–2002 [machine-readable data file and documentation]. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  151. Vinkhuyzen AAE, van der Sluis S, Maes HHM, Posthuma D (2012) Reconsidering the heritability of intelligence in adulthood: taking assortative mating and cultural transmission into account. Behav Genet 42(2):187–198Google Scholar
  152. Vohs KD, Schooler JW (2008) The value of believing in free will. Psychol Sci 19(1):49–54Google Scholar
  153. Vonasch AJ, Clark CJ, Lau S, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF (2017) Ordinary people associate addiction with loss of free will. Addict Behav Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2017.01.002 Google Scholar
  154. Weary G, Williams JP (1990) Depressive self-presentation: beyond self-handicapping. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(5):892–898Google Scholar
  155. Whitton SW, Larson JJ, Hauser ST (2008) Depressive symptoms and bias in perceived social competence among young adults. J Clin Psychol 64(7):791–805Google Scholar
  156. Wu W (2015) Experts and deviants: the story of agentive control. Philos Phenomenol Res 93(1):101–126Google Scholar
  157. Zagzebski L (1996) Virtues of the mind. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ferkauf Graduate School of PsychologyYeshiva UniversityBronxUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations