Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 386–396 | Cite as

Resting Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in Adolescents and Young Adults from a Genetically-Informed Perspective

  • Jessica L. Bourdon
  • Ashlee A. Moore
  • Meridith Eastman
  • Jeanne E. Savage
  • Laura Hazlett
  • Scott R. Vrana
  • John M. Hettema
  • Roxann Roberson-Nay
Original Research

Abstract

Reduced heart rate variability (HRV) is associated with cardiac morbidity, mortality, and negative psychopathology. Most research concerning genetic influences on HRV has focused on adult populations, with fewer studies investigating the developmental period of adolescence and emerging adulthood. The current study estimated the genetic and environmental contributions to resting HRV in a sample of twins using various HRV time domain metrics to assess autonomic function across two different time measurement intervals (2.5- and 10-min). Five metrics of resting HRV [mean interbeat interval (IBI), the standard deviation of normal IBIs (SDNN), root square mean of successive differences between IBIs (RMSSD), cardiac vagal index (CVI), and cardiac sympathetic index (CSI)] were assessed in 421 twin pairs aged 14–20 during a baseline electrocardiogram. This was done for four successive 2.5-min intervals as well as the overall 10-min interval. Heritability (h2) appeared consistent across intervals within each metric with the following estimates (collapsed across time intervals): mean IBI (h2 = 0.36–0.46), SDNN (h2 = 0.23–0.30), RMSSD (h2 = 0.36–0.39), CVI (h2 = 0.37–0.42), CSI (h2 = 0.33–0.46). Beyond additive genetic contributions, unique environment also was an important influence on HRV. Within each metric, a multivariate Cholesky decomposition further revealed evidence of genetic stability across the four successive 2.5-min intervals. The same models showed evidence for both genetic and environmental stability with some environmental attenuation and innovation. All measures of HRV were moderately heritable across time, with further analyses revealing consistent patterns of genetic and environmental influences over time. This study confirms that in an adolescent sample, the time interval used (2.5- vs. 10-min) to measure HRV time domain metrics does not affect the relative proportions of genetic and environmental influences.

Keywords

Heart rate variability Heritability Time metrics Time intervals Adolescence Psychophysiology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants from the Adolescent and Young Adult Twin Study (AYATS), as well as the many VCU students who contributed to execution of the project, particularly Jason Burchett. We would also like to thank Audrey Anderson for her assistance collecting and processing the data and Shannon Hahn and Jennifer Cecilione for their work as project coordinators.

Funding

The AYATS is funded by NIMH R01MH101518 (PI: RRN). AAM is supported by NIMH F31MH111229. JLB, MLE, and JES are supported by NIMH T32MH020030. LH is supported by NIMH R01MH101518. JMH is supported by NIMH R01MH098055.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Jessica L. Bourdon, Ashlee A. Moore, Meridith Eastman, Jeanne E. Savage, Laura Hazlett, Scott R. Vrana, John M. Hettema, Roxann Roberson-Nay declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent/assent was collected for all participants and procedures were approved the university’s Institutional Review Board.

Human and animal rights

All human subjects ethical standards were followed by all authors and research assistants who worked on the AYATS. Each individual involved in the project is up-to-date on Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) and MATR training.

Supplementary material

10519_2018_9915_MOESM1_ESM.docx (286 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 285 KB)

References

  1. Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JJB (2002) Calculating the metrics of cardiac chronotropy: a pragmatic overview. Psychophysiology. 39:S18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen JJB, Chambers AS, Towers DN (2007) The many metrics of cardiac chronotropy: a pragmatic primer and brief comparison of metrics. Biol Psychol 74:243–262CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. BIOPAC Systems, Inc (2010) Acqknowledge for MP Systems, version 4.1.1. http://www.biopac.com
  5. Boker S, Neale M, Maes H, Wilde M, Spiegel M, Brick T, Spies J, Estabrook R, Kenny S, Bates T, Mehta P, Fox J (2011) OpenMx: an open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 76:306–317CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Cecilione JL, Rappaport LM, Hahn SE, Anderson AE, Hazlett LE, Burchett JR, Moore AA, Savage JE, Hettema JM, Roberson-Nay R (2018) Genetic and environmental contributions of negative valence systems to internalizing pathways. Twin Res Hum Genet 21(1):12–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Costello EJ, Mustillo S, Erkanli A, Keeler G, Angold A (2003) Prevalence and development of psychiatric disorders in childhood and adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry 60:837–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Geus EJD, Kupper N, Boomsma DI, Snieder H (2007) Bivariate genetic modeling of cardiovascular stess reactivity: does stress uncover genetic variance? Psychosom Med 69:356–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dekker JM, de Vries EL, Lengton RR, Schouten EG, Swenne CA, Maan A (1996) Reproducibility and comparability of short- and long-term heart rate variability measures in healthy young men. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 1:287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Lijster JM, Dierckx B, Utens EMWJ, Verhulst FC, Zieldorff C, Dieleman GC, Legerstee JS (2017) The age of onset of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Can J Psychiatry 62:237–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dieleman GC, Huizink AC, Tulen JHM, Utens EMWJ, Tiemeier H (2016) Stress reactivity predicts symptom improvement in children with anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord 196:190–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Farmer AD, Ban VF, Coen SJ, Sanger GJ, Barker GJ, Gresty MA, Giampietro VP, Williams SC, Webb DL, Hellström PM, Andrews PL, Aziz Q (2015) Visually induced nausa causes characteristic changes in cerebral, autonomic and endocrine function in humans. J Physiol 593.5:1183–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Golosheykin S, Grant JD, Novak OV, Heath AC, Anokhin AP (2017) Genetic influences on heart rate variability. Int J Psychophysiol 115:65–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hankin BL, Abramson LY, Moffitt TE, Silva PA, McGee R, Angell KE (1998) Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. J Abnorm Psychol 107:128–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hovland A, Pallesen S, Hammar A, Hansen AL, Thayer JF, Tarvainen MP, Nordhus IH (2012) The relationships among heart rate variability, executive functions, and clinical variables in patients with panic disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 86:269–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Howell DC (1998) Statistical methods in human sciences. Wadsworth, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasriel J, Eaves L (1976) The zygosity of twins: further evidence on the agreement between diagnosis by blood groups and written questionnaires. J Biosoc Sci 8:263–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Lichtenstein P (2008) A developmental twin study of symptoms of anxiety and depression: evidence for genetic innovation and attenuation. Psychol Med 38:1567–1575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleiger RE, Stein PK, Bigger JT Jr (2005) Heart rate variability: measurement and clinical utility. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 10(1):88–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR (1998) Major depressive disorder in older adolescents: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical implications. Clin Psychol Rev 18:765–794CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lilley EC, Silberg JL (2013) The Mid-Atlantic Twin Registry, revisited. Twin Res Hum Genet 16:424–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin NG, Eaves LJ, Kearsey MJ, Davies P (1978) The power of the classical twin study. Heredity 40:97–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Munoz ML, van Roon A, Riese H, Thio C, Oostenbroek E, Westrik I, de Geus EJ, Gansevoort R, Lefrandt J, Nolte IM, Snieder H (2015) Validity of (ultra-) short recordings for heart rate variability measurements. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0138921.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Neale MC, Cardon LR (1992) Methodology for genetic studies of twin and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neijts M, Van Lien R, Boomsma D, Willemsen G, De Geus EJC (2014) Heritability of cardiac vagal control in 24-h heart rate variability recordings: influence of ceiling effects at low heart rates. Psychophysiology 51:1023–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nolte IM, Munoz ML, Tragante V, Amare AT, Jansen R, Vaez A, Von Der Heyde B, Avery CL, Bis JC, Dierckx B, Van Dongen J, de Geus EJC (2017) Genetic loci associated with heart rate variability and their effects on cardiac disease risk. Nat Commun 8:15805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Nussinovitch U, Elishkevitz KP, Katz K, Nussinovitch M, Segev S, Volovitz B, Nussinovitch N (2011) Reliability of ultra-short ECG indices for heart rate variability. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 16:117–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
  29. Saluja G, Iachan R, Scheidt PC, Overpeck MD, Sun W, Giedd JN (2004) Prevalence of and risk factors for depressive symptoms among young adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158:760–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Shahrestani S, Stewart EM, Quintana DS, Hickie IB, Guastella AJ (2014) Heart rate variability during adolescent and adult social interactions: a meta-analysis. Biol Psychol 105:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Su S, Lampert R, Lee F, Bremner JD, Snieder H, Jones L, Murray NV, Goldberg J, Vaccarino V (2010) Common genes contribute to depressive symptoms and heart rate variability: the Twin Heart Study. Twin Res Hum Genet 13:1–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sugaya N, Izawa Sh, Yamamoto R, Ogawa N, Yajima J, Okamura H, Horiuchi S, Tsuda A, Nomura S (2015) Salivary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol increases after awakening in healthy young adults. Psychophysiology 52:425–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Task Force for the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93:1043–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Toichi M, Kamio Y (2003) Paradoxical autonomic response to mental tasks in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 33:417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Toichi M, Suguira T, Murai T, Sengoku A (1997) A new method of assessing cardiac autonomic function and its comparison with spectral analysis and coefficient of variation of R-R interval. J Auton Nerv Syst 62:79–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vasquez L, Blood JD, Wu J, Chaplin TM, Hommer RE, Rutherford HJV, Potenza MN, Mayes LC, Crowley MJ (2016) High frequency heart-rate variability predicts adolescent depressive symptoms, particularly anhedonia, across one year. J Affect Disord 196:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verhulst B (2017) A power calculator for the classical twin design. Behav Genet 47:255–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang X, Thayer JF, Treiber F, Snieder H (2005) Ethnic differences and heritability of heart rate variability in African- and European American youth. Am J Cardiol 96:1166–1172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang X, Ding X, Su S, Li Z, Reisese H, Thayer JF, Treiber F, Sneider H (2009) Genetic influences on heart rate variability at rest and during stress. Psychophysiology 467:458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang B, Liao C, Zhou B, Cao W, Lv J, Yu C, Gao W, Li L (2015) Genetic contribution to the variance of blood pressure and heart rate: a systematic review and meta-regression of twin studies. Twin Res Hum Genet 18:158–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Weinberg A, Klonsky ED, Hajcak G (2009) Autonomic impairment in borderline personality disorder: a laboratory investigation. Brain Cognit 71:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wilks SS (1938) The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann Math Stat 9(1):670–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams LJ, Holahan PJ (1994) Parsimony-based fit indices for multiple-indicator models: Do they work? Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 1(2):161–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams PG, Holmbeck GN, Greenley RN (2002) Adolescent health psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol 70:828–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu T, Snieder H, De Geus E (2010) Genetic influences on cardiovascular stress reactivity. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:58–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica L. Bourdon
    • 1
  • Ashlee A. Moore
    • 1
  • Meridith Eastman
    • 1
  • Jeanne E. Savage
    • 1
  • Laura Hazlett
    • 1
  • Scott R. Vrana
    • 2
  • John M. Hettema
    • 1
    • 3
  • Roxann Roberson-Nay
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral GeneticsVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations