Advertisement

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp 6109–6139 | Cite as

The shear pin strength of friction pendulum bearings (FPB) in simply supported railway bridges

  • Lizhong Jiang
  • Weikun He
  • Biao WeiEmail author
  • Zhenwei Wang
  • Shanshan Li
Original Research
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

The friction pendulum bearings (FPB) begin to be used in railway bridges in China. In one earthquake region in China, the shear pins of FPB are required to be well to provide the enough shear force and stiffness under service loads (such as the vehicle forces being less than 170 kN in the longitudinal direction and 40 kN in the transverse direction) or small earthquake loads with a peak ground acceleration (PGA) being less than 0.1 g, however, are cut off to isolate seismic energy under large earthquake loads with a PGA being larger than 0.2 g. It is necessary to identify the appropriate strength of FPB shear pin to satisfy the above requirements. This paper selected the simply supported bridges on a single-line railway in the above earthquake region as the study object, which had a span length of 32 m and two height types of piers (8 m and 25 m). A prototype finite element model (FEM) and a scaled FEM were numerically analyzed, and a scaled experimental model was tested on shake table for each bridge. The results of them were compared with each other to validate the rationality of all models and to achieve the appropriate strength of FPB shear pin. The results show that the appropriate strengths of FPB shear pins are 540 kN in the longitudinal direction and 300 kN in the transverse direction for the bridge with the pier height of 8 m. Likewise, 350 kN and 270 kN are determined as the appropriate strengths of FPB shear pins for the bridge with the pier height of 25 m in the longitudinal and transverse directions, respectively. The numerical method of FEM is correct based on the experimental validation, and can be used to identify the appropriate strengths of FPB shear pins for other railway bridges.

Keywords

Simply supported railway bridge Friction pendulum bearing (FPB) Shear pin Seismic isolation Numerical analysis Shaking table test 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is jointly supported by the Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Province Under Grant No. 2019YFG0048, the National Natural Science Foundations of China Under Grant Nos. 51778635 and 51778630, the Natural Science Foundations of Hunan Province Under Grant No. 2019JJ40386, the Research Program on Displacement Limitation Technology of Half-through Railway Arch Bridge Under Grant No. science2018-81. The above support is greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Baltzopoulos G, Baraschino R, Iervolino I, Vamvatsikos D (2018) Dynamic analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems (DYANAS): a graphical user interface for OpenSees. Eng Struct 177:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao Y, Becker TC, Hamaguchi H (2017) Failure of double friction pendulum bearings under pulse-type motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(5):715–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Della Vecchia P (2015) Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct 95:80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP (2007) Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading [Report MCEER-07-0012]. Buffalo, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC (2010) Behaviour of the double concave friction pendulum bearing. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(11):1403–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamutcuoglu OM, Scott MH (2009) Finite element reliability analysis of bridge girders considering moment–shear interaction. Struct Saf 31(5):356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jara JM, López MG, Jara M, Olmos BA (2014) Rotation and damage index demands for RC medium-length span bridges. Eng Struct 74:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang C, Wei B, Wang D, Jiang L, He X (2017) Seismic vulnerability evaluation of a three-span continuous beam railway bridge. Math Probl Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3468076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang X, Jiang L, Bai Y, Caprani CC (2017) Seismic damage evaluation of high-speed railway bridge components under different intensities of earthquake excitations. Eng Struct 152:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kavvadias IE, Bibo HF, Vasiliadis LK (2017) Finite element modeling of single and multi-spherical Friction Pendulum Bearings. In: COMPDYN 2017—proceedings of the 6th international conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, vol 2. pp 4408–4416Google Scholar
  11. Kawashima K, Takahashi Y, Ge H, Wu Z, Zhang J (2009) Reconnaissance report on damage of bridges in 2008 Wenchuan, China, Earthquake. J Earthq Eng 13(7):965–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khoshnoudian F, Arash HT (2014) Impact of structures with double concave friction pendulum bearings on adjacent structures. Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build 167(1):41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Landi L, Grazi G, Diotallevi PP (2016) Comparison of different models for friction pendulum isolators in structures subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 81:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maleki S (2006) Seismic energy dissipation with shear connectors for bridges. Eng Struct 28(1):134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malekzadeh M, Taghikhany T (2010) Adaptive behavior of double concave friction pendulum bearing and its advantages over friction pendulum systems. Sci Iran Trans A Civ Eng 17(2):81–88Google Scholar
  16. Matsagar VA, Jangid RS (2008) Base isolation for seismic retrofitting of structures. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 13(4):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohammadi A, Nouri G (2017) Investigation on the effect of near-fault earthquake on double concave friction pendulum (DCFP) base isolated buildings. Procedia Eng 199:1731–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peng T, Yu X, Wang Z, Han L (2012) Study of the seismic performance of expansion double spherical seismic isolation bearings for continuous girder bridges. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 11(2):163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ponzo FC, Cesare AD, Leccese G, Nigro D (2015) Shaking table tests of a base isolated structure with double concave friction pendulum bearings. Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 48(2):136–144Google Scholar
  20. Ponzo FC, Di Cesare A, Leccese G, Nigro D (2017) Shake table testing on restoring capability of double concave friction pendulum seismic isolation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(14):2337–2353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saiidi MS, Vosooghi A, Choi H, Somerville P (2014) Shake table studies and analysis of a two-span RC bridge model subjected to a fault rupture. J Bridge Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000478 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shah VM, Psoni D (2017) Response of the double concave friction pendulum system under triaxial ground excitations. Plast Impact Mech 173:1870–1877Google Scholar
  23. Shao G, Jiang L, Chouw N (2014) Experimental investigations of the seismic performance of bridge piers with rounded rectangular cross-sections. Earthq Struct 7(4):463–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tajammolian H, Khoshnoudian F, Talaei S, Loghman V (2014) The effects of peak ground velocity of near-field ground motions on the seismic responses of base-isolated structures mounted on friction bearings. Earthq Struct 7(6):1259–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang Z, Lee GC (2009) A comparative study of bridge damage due to the Wenchuan, Northridge, Loma Prieta and San Fernando earthquakes. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 8(2):251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei B, Wang P, He X, Jiang L (2016a) Seismic response of spring-damper-rolling systems with concave friction distribution. Earthq Struct 11(1):25–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wei B, Wang P, Liu W, Yang M, Jiang L (2016b) The impact of the concave distribution of rolling friction coefficient on the seismic isolation performance of a spring-rolling system. Int J Non-Linear Mech 83:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wei B, Wang P, Yang MG, Jiang LZ (2017) Seismic response of rolling isolation systems with concave friction distribution. J Earthq Eng 21(2):325–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei B, Yang T, Jiang L, He X (2018) Effects of friction-based fixed bearings on the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Adv Struct Eng 21(5):643–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wei B, Li C, He X (2019a) The applicability of different earthquake intensity measures to the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Int J Civ Eng 17(7):981–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wei B, Zuo C, He X, Hu Q (2019b) Earthquake isolation of a spring-damper-friction system with a convex friction distribution. J Test Eval 47(2):889–904Google Scholar
  32. Wei B, Zhuo Y, Li C, Yang M (2019c) Parameter optimization of a vertical spring-viscous damper-Coulomb friction system. Shock Vib.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5764946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xia X, Chen X, Wang X, Wang C (2012) Effect of shear key on seismic responses of bridge using isolation bearing. J Earthq Eng Eng Vib 32(6):104–109Google Scholar
  34. Xia Y, Wang P, Sun L (2019) Neutral axis position based health monitoring and condition assessment techniques for concrete box girder bridges. Int J Struct Stab Dyn.  https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219455419400157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan L, Li Q, Han C, Jiang H (2016) Shaking table tests of curved bridge considering bearing friction sliding isolation. Shock Vib.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6245062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou Y, Lu X (2016) Method and techology for shaking table model test of building structures. Science Press, Beijing, pp 59–62 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  37. Zhou F, Xiang W, Ye K, Zhu H (2019) Theoretical study of the double concave friction pendulum system under variable vertical loading. Adv Struct Eng 22(8):1998–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhu M, Scott MH (2014) Modeling fluid-structure interaction by the particle finite element method in OpenSees. Comput Struct 132:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.National Engineering Laboratory for High Speed Railway ConstructionChangshaChina
  3. 3.Zhejiang Scientific Research Institute of TransportHangzhouChina
  4. 4.Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural TechnologyXuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations