Advertisement

Seismic strengthening of clay block masonry buildings with composites: an experimental study of a full scale three-storey building model

  • Petra TrillerEmail author
  • Miha Tomaževič
  • Matija Gams
Original Research
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

The efficiency of strengthening of unreinforced hollow clay block masonry buildings with fibre reinforced mortar coatings has been investigated. A full scale three-storey building model and a series of accompanying walls have been built and tested. Reference unstrengthened, and strengthened specimens of each type have been tested by subjecting them to cyclic shear at constant compressive load. First, the three-storey model was tested in its original state until the maximum resistance was attained and major, but still repairable damage, developed in the walls. Then, the damaged model was strengthened with fabric reinforced cementitious mortar coating and re-tested up to near collapse limit state. Typical storey mechanism was observed in original and strengthened state, with the majority of damage concentrated in the walls of the bottom storey. Diagonally oriented shear cracks prevailed in the elements in the direction of loading. The behaviour of single walls in cyclic shear tests was similar to that observed in the piers of the building models. The analysis of test results indicated that the resistance and displacement capacity of unreinforced masonry structures of the particular type tested can be significantly improved if delamination and separation of coating is prevented. Finally, a calculation model for the assessment of seismic resistance of reference and strengthened building model is presented and the comparison between calculated and experimental results discussed.

Keywords

Unreinforced masonry Laboratory testing Cyclic shear test Glass fibre reinforced polymers (GFRP) Coating Strengthening 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this article was carried out within the research projects J2-6749 and ARRS-MR-496, financed by Slovenian Research Agency.

References

  1. Calvi GM, Kingsley GR, Magenes G (1996) Testing masonry structures for seismic assessment. Earthq Spectra 12(1):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corradi M, Borri A, Vignoli A (2002) Strengthening techniques tested on masonry structures struck by the Umbria–Marche earthquake of 1997–1998. Constr Build Mater 16(4):229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehsani MR, Saadatmanesh H, Al-Saidy A (1997) Shear behavior of URM retrofitted with FRP overlays. J Compos Constr 1(1):17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. EN 772-9 (1998) Methods of test for masonry units. Determination of volume and percentage of voids and net volume of clay and calcium silicate masonry units by sand filling. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  5. EN 1052-1 (1999) Methods of test for masonry. Determination of compressive strength. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  6. EN 1015-11 (2001) Methods of test for mortar for masonry—Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  7. EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  8. EN 1052-3 (2004) Methods of test for masonry—Part 3: determination of initial shear strength. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  9. EN 1996-1-1 (2005) Eurocode 6: design of masonry structures—Part 1-1: general rules for buildings—rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  10. EN 13412 (2006) Products and systems for the protection and repair of concrete structures. Test methods. Determination of modulus of elasticity in compression. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  11. EN 12390-3 (2009) Testing hardened concrete. Compressive strength of test specimens. BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  12. Foraboschi P (2016) Effectiveness of novel methods to increase the FRP-masonry bond capacity. Compos B Eng 107:214–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gams M, Tomaževič M, Berset M (2017) Seismic strengthening of brick masonry by composite coatings: an experimental study. Bull Earthq Eng 15(10):4269–4298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leone M, Aiello MA, Balsamo A, Carozzi FG, Ceroni F, Corradi M, Gams M, Garbin E, Gattesco N, Krajewski P, Mazzotti C, Oliveira D, Papanicolaou C, Ranocchiai G, Roscini F, Saenger D (2017) Glass fabric reinforced cementitious matrix: tensile properties and bond performance on masonry substrate. Compos B 127:196–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lutman M (2010) Seismic resistance assessment of heritage masonry buildings in Ljubljana. Int J Arhit Herit 4(3):198–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lutman M, Bohinc U, Gams M, Tomaževič M (2012) In situ tests for the assessment of seismic strengthening historic brick masonry walls with carbon fiber fabric. In: 15th world conference of earthquake engineering, 24–28. September 2012, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  17. Mayes RL, Clough RW (1975) State-of-the-art in seismic shear strength of masonry—an evaluation and review. University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Messali F, Metelli G, Plizzari G (2017) Experimental results on the retrofitting of hollow brick masonry walls with reinforced high performance mortar coatings. Constr Build Mater 141:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwegler G (1994) Masonry construction strengthened with fiber composites in seismically endangered zones. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  20. Tomaževič M (1978) Improvement of computer program POR. Report ZRMK-IK, Ljubljana (in Slovene) Google Scholar
  21. Tomaževič M (2007) Damage as a measure for earthquake-resistant design of masonry structures: Slovenian experience. Can J Civ Eng 34(11):1403–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tomaževič M (2016) Some considerations on testing and experimental simulation of seismic behaviour of masonry walls and buildings. V: Modena C, Da Porto F, Valluzzi MR (eds) Brick and block masonry: trends, innovations and challenges, proceedings of the 16th international brick and block masonry conference (IBMAC 2016), 26–30 June 2016, PaduaGoogle Scholar
  23. Tomaževič M, Sheppard P, Žarnić R (1985) Experimental studies of methods and techniques for the repair and strengthening of historic buildings in old urban and rural nuclei. In: US-Yugoslav workshop on Protection of Historic Buildings and Town Centres in Seismic Regions, 17-22 June 1985, Budva (in Slovene) Google Scholar
  24. Triantafillou TC, Fardis MN (1997) Strengthening of historic masonry structures with composite materials. Mater Struct 30:486–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turnšek V, Čačovič F (1971) Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. In: Proceedings 2nd international brick-masonry conference. British Ceramic Society, Stoke-on-Trent, pp 149–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil and Geodeting EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations