The peak over the design threshold in strong earthquakes
In state-of-the-art seismic design, reference seismic actions are based on probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, which provides the ground-motion intensity corresponding to a reference return period of exceedance at the site. Exceedance of elastic actions, which is systematically observed in the epicentral areas of strong earthquakes, does not necessarily mean violation of the structural design limit-state; nevertheless, in such a case, the safety margins inherent to design are left to other factors beyond the elastic spectrum, which are, in general, not explicitly controlled. Therefore, it might be useful to quantify the expected (i.e., mean) amount of ground-motion intensity exceedance in earthquakes for which the design spectrum is not conservative. In fact, this study, with reference to Italy, provides and discusses the map of the expected value of acceleration, given the exceedance of the design spectra at any site in the country. It is shown, among other results, that: (1) the expected exceedance varies significantly from site-to-site across the country despite the same return period of the threshold is considered everywhere, (2) its pattern is opposite to that of the \(\varepsilon\) from disaggregation, and (3) the peak-over-the-threshold can be larger than 2.5 times than the corresponding ordinate of the design spectrum with 475 years return period. These results may be informative about what to expect for code-conforming structures in terms of seismic actions during strong earthquakes, that is, those able to cause exceedance of design elastic spectra.
KeywordsPerformance-based seismic design Building code Seismic structural safety
This article was developed within the activities of the ReLUIS-DPC 2014–2018 research project, funded by Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri – Dipartimento della Protezione Civile. The conclusions and opinions expressed, does not necessarily correspond to those of the funding entity. The helpful comments by Simone Barani (Università degli Studi di Genova) and Laurentiu Danciu (Swiss Seismological Service) are also acknowledged.
- Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:501–520Google Scholar
- CEN (2004) European Committee for Standardisation. Eurocode 8: design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, part 1.1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, prEN 1998-1Google Scholar
- Chioccarelli E, De Luca F, Iervolino I (2012) Preliminary study of Emilia (May 20th 2012) earthquake ground-motion records V2.11. Available at http://www.reluis.it/. Accessed Apr 2018
- CSLLPP (2008) Decreto Ministeriale 14 gennaio 2008: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, no. 29. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana (in Italian) Google Scholar
- Douglas J (2014) Fifty years of ground-motion models. In: 2ECEES 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
- Iervolino I, Giorgio M (2017) È possibile evitare il superamento delle azioni di progetto nell’area epicentrale di terremoti forti? Progett Sismica 8:25–32 (in Italian) Google Scholar
- Iervolino I, Chioccarelli E, Cito P (2016) REASSESS V1.0: a computationally-efficient software for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: VII ECCOMAS European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Crete Island, GreeceGoogle Scholar
- Iervolino I, Spillatura A, Bazzurro P (2017b) RINTC Project—assessing the (implicit) seismic risk of code-conforming structures in Italy. In: COMPDYN, VI ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Rhodes Island, GreeceGoogle Scholar
- Iervolino I, Chioccarelli E, Cito P (2018) Which earthquakes are expected to exceed the design spectra? (in review) Google Scholar
- Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strongmotion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011–2038Google Scholar
- McGuire RK (2004) Seismic hazard and risk analysis. Report MNO-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute OaklandGoogle Scholar
- Mood AM, Graybill FA, Boes D (1974) Introduction to the theory of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar