Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 845–865 | Cite as

An innovative cladding panel connection for RC precast buildings

  • Emanuele Del Monte
  • Cesare Falsini
  • Sonia Boschi
  • Giovanni Menichini
  • Maurizio OrlandoEmail author


Recent Italian earthquakes highlighted some critical issues of mechanical devices usually utilized to fasten reinforced concrete cladding panels to precast structures. These devices were often designed to uncouple the displacements of cladding panels and the frame structure. Unfortunately, during the last earthquakes, the cladding-to-structure connections did not perform as expected, and in most cases, they failed causing the overturning of cladding panels. The paper presents results of a wide experimental campaign on both commercial and innovative mechanical cladding-to-structure connections, both for vertical and horizontal panels. Tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Testing Laboratory of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of Florence, where a specific and original setup was designed to perform dynamic cyclic tests, under different load conditions. Commercial connections showed a hysteretic behaviour until the collapse, due to the flexural failure of the strap or to the failure of the anchor channel fixed to beams or columns and the expulsion of the hammer-head screws. Proposed innovative connections, especially those used for vertical panels, proved to be able to uncouple in-plane horizontal displacements of panels and the structure, as expected in their design. Moreover, no significant damage was detected in these connections during tests, as friction forces were very low.


Precast cladding panels Industrial precast buildings Experimental tests Connections Anchor channels 



The authors would like to thank the Company Baraclit S.p.A., who commissioned the experimental campaign and provided specimens and technical support. The authors also thank the Structures and Materials Testing Laboratory (SMTS) team of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Florence, Mr. Saverio Giordano, Mr. Franco Bruni and Mr. Enzo Barlacchi, and Spin-Off S2R team for their support during all the phases of the experimental campaign.


  1. Belleri A, Torquati M, Marini A, Riva P (2016) Horizontal cladding panels: in-plane seismic performance in precast concrete buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 14:1103–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biondini F, Dal Lago B, Toniolo G (2013) Role of wall panel connections on the seismic performance of precast structures. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1061–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bournas DA, Negro P, Taucer FF (2013) Performance of industrial buildings during the Emilia earthquakes in Northern Italy and recommendations for their strengthening. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):2383–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. CEN (2005) EN1998-1. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildingsGoogle Scholar
  5. Dal Lago B, Lamperti Tornaghi M, Dal Lago A (2012) Studio sul comportamento bidirezionale di connessioni meccaniche scorrevoli pannello-telaio. In: 21° Congresso CTE, 08-10 Novembre, Bologna, IT (in Italian)Google Scholar
  6. Fischinger M, Kramar M, Isakovic T (2008) Cyclic response of slender RC columns typical of precast industrial buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henry RM, Roll F (1986) Cladding-frame interaction. J Struct Eng ASCE 112(4):815–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hunt JP, Stojadinović B (2010) Seismic performance assessment and probabilistic repair cost analysis of precast concrete cladding systems for multistory buildings. Peer report 2010/110. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, p 347Google Scholar
  9. Isakovic T, Zoubek B, Fischinger M (2017) Design Procedures For typical cladding panel connections in Rc precast buildings. In: 16° WCEE. Santiago ChileGoogle Scholar
  10. Magliulo G, Ercolino M, Petrone C, Coppola O, Manfredi G (2014) The Emilia earthquake: seismic performance of precast reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Spectra 30(2):891–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Negro P, Lamperti Tornaghi M (2017) Seismic response of precast structures with vertical cladding panels: the SAFECLADDING experimental campaign. Eng Struct 132:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. NTC 2018 (2018) Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. D.M. 17 January 2018, Italian Ministry of Public Works, Italy (in Italian)Google Scholar
  13. Orlando M, Piscitelli LR (2016) Experimental investigation on static and cyclic behaviour of flanged unions for precast reinforced concrete columns. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. Google Scholar
  14. Piras D, Belleri A, Riva P (2010) Prove sperimentali sul comportamento sismico di pannelli di tamponamento orizzontali prefabbricati. In: 18° Congresso CTE. 12-14 Novembre, Brescia, IT (in Italian)Google Scholar
  15. SAFECLADDING Project (2013). (
  16. Savoia M, Mazzotti C, Buratti N, Ferracuti B, Bovo M, Ligabue V, Vincenzi L (2012) Damages and collapses in industrial precast buildings after the Emilia earthquake. Ing Sismica—Int J Earthq Eng 29(2–3):120–131Google Scholar
  17. Scotta R, De Stefani L, Vitaliani R (2015) Passive control of precast building response using cladding panels as dissipative shear walls. Bull Earthq Eng 13(11):3527–3552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Toniolo G, Colombo A (2012) Precast concrete structures: the lessons learned from the L’Aquila earthquake. Struct Concrete 13:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zoubek B, Fischinger M, Isakovic T (2016) Cyclic response of hammer-head strap cladding-to-structure connections used in rc precast building. Eng Struct 119(2016):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DICEAUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Baraclit S.p.ABibbienaItaly

Personalised recommendations