Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 2741–2766 | Cite as

Implementation of a simple novel Abaqus user element to predict the behavior of unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators in macro-scale computations

  • Ahmad Basshofi Habieb
  • Marco Valente
  • Gabriele MilaniEmail author
Original Research


The need for seismic protection of structures located in earthquake prone areas of developing countries has motivated several investigations of low-cost seismic isolators in recent years. One of the most promising device is the Unbonded Fiber Reinforced Elastomeric Isolator (UFREI): in UFREIs no bonding or fastening is provided between the bearing and top–bottom supports and expensive thick steel plates are not required. The behavior of UFREIs is characterized by rollover and full-contact deformations under horizontal loads: the former decreases the effective stiffness of the isolation system, thus reducing the seismic demand, while the latter plays a key role in generating a hardening phase, thus limiting the horizontal displacement of the isolator under severe earthquakes. Such remarkable advantages highlight a great potential for world-wide UFREIs applications. However, until now there is no representative UFREI model available in structural analysis software codes. In this work, a comprehensive but simple UFREI model is implemented in an ABAQUS user element (UEL), taking into account non-linear, hardening and hysteretic behavior of the bearing: in addition, multiple DOFs are considered to simulate the complex 3D behavior of UFREIs, which is characterized by horizontal and vertical displacements, rotation and torsion. The effectiveness of the UEL model is evaluated performing 3D FE dynamic time history analyses on a rigid slab supported by four different types of UFREI. The results show that the UEL model can reasonably fit the behavior of the detailed FE model, significantly reducing the computational efforts of the analyses. The UEL model proposed in this study can be particularly suitable for 3D dynamic time history analyses of complex base isolated structures.


Fiber reinforced elastomeric isolator Phenomenological model ABAQUS user element FE analysis 



A.B Habieb would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the Finance Ministry of Indonesian Republic (LPDP Scholarship) for performing his Ph.D. program at the Technical University of Milan, Italy.


  1. Al-Anany YM, Tait MJ (2015) A numerical study on the compressive and rotational behavior of fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators (FREI). Compos Struct 133:1249–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Anany YM, Van Engelen NC, Tait MJ (2017) Vertical and lateral behavior of unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators. J Compos Constr 21:04017019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, AASHTO (2000) Guide specification for seismic isolation design, 2/eGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruneau M, Engelhardt M, Filiatrault A, Goel SC, Itani A, Hajjar J, Leon R, Ricles J, Stojadinovic B, Uang CM (2005) Review of selected recent research on US seismic design and retrofit strategies for steel structures. Prog Struct Mater Eng 7(3):103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calabrese A, Spizzuoco M, Serino G, Della Corte G, Maddaloni G (2015) Shaking table investigation of a novel, low-cost, base isolation technology using recycled rubber. Struct Control Health Monit 22:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardone D, Perrone G (2012) Critical load of slender elastomeric seismic isolators: an experimental perspective. Eng Struct 40:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castellano A, Foti P, Fraddosio A, Marzano S, Mininno G, Piccioni MD (2014) Seismic response of a historic masonry construction isolated by stable unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators (SU-FREI). Key Eng Mater 628:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CEB-FIB (Comité Européen du Béton - Fédération Internationale du Béton) (2003) Seismic assessment and retrofit of reinforced concrete buildings. CEB-FIB Bulletin no. 24. International Federation for Structural Concrete, Task Group 7.1Google Scholar
  9. Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP (2007) Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical Report MCEER-07-0012Google Scholar
  10. Das A, Deb SK, Dutta A (2016a) Comparison of numerical and experimental seismic responses of FREI-supported un-reinforced brick masonry model building. J Earthq Eng 20:1239–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das A, Deb SK, Dutta A (2016b) Shake table testing of un-reinforced brick masonry building test model isolated by U-FREI. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Raaf MGP, Tait MJ, Toopchi-Nezhad H (2011) Stability of fiber-reinforced elastomeric bearings in an unbonded application. J Compos Mater 45:1873–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di Sarno L, Elnashai AS (2005) Innovative strategies for seismic retrofitting of steel and composite structures. Prog Struct Mater Eng 7(3):115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Di Sarno L, Elnashai AS (2009) Bracing systems for seismic retrofitting of steel frames. J Constr Steel Res 65:452–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehsani B, Toopchi-Nezhad H (2017) Systematic design of unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators. Eng Struct 132:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eurocode 8 (2005) Design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings: based on EN-Eurocode 8. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fardis MN, Schetakis A, Strepelias E (2013) RC buildings retrofitted by converting frame bays into RC walls. Bull Earthq Eng 11:1541–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) (2000) (2000) FEMA 356: pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S, Cimadom F (2003) Design of bilinear hysteretic isolation systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(9):1333–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giannuzzi D, Ballarini R, Hucklebridge A, Pollino M, Valente M (2014) Braced ductile shear panel: new seismic-resistant framing system. J Struct Eng ASCE 140(2):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habieb AB, Milani G, Tavio T, Milani F (2017a) Low cost frictional seismic base-isolation of residential new masonry buildings in developing countries: a small masonry house case study. Open Civ Eng J 11:1026–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habieb A, Milani G, Tavio T, Milani F (2017b) Seismic performance of a masonry building isolated with low cost rubber isolators. WIT Trans Built Environ 172:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habieb A, Milani G, Tavio T, Milani F (2017c) Numerical model of low cost rubber isolators for masonry housing in high seismic regions. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Civ Environ Struct Constr Archit Eng 11(5):590–596Google Scholar
  25. Habieb A, Milani G, Tavio T, Milani F (2017d) FE modelling of fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators (FREI): mesh verification and validation. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1978, p 450006Google Scholar
  26. Habieb AB, Milani G, Tavio T (2018a) Two-step advanced numerical approach for the design of low-cost unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric seismic isolation systems in new masonry buildings. Eng Fail Anal 90:380–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habieb AB, Milani G, Tavio T, Milani F (2018b) Practical designs and seismic performances of residential masonry building isolated with fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators. In: 10th international masonry conference, MilanGoogle Scholar
  28. Habieb AB, Valente M, Milani G (2018c) Base seismic isolation of a historical masonry church using fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators. Soil Dyn Earth Eng (accepted) Google Scholar
  29. S.N. Indonesia (2013) Persyaratan beton struktural untuk bangunan gedung, SNI 2847Google Scholar
  30. Jerrams SJ, Kaya M, Soon KF (1998) The effects of strain rate and hardness on the material constants of nitrile rubbers. Mater Des 19:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelly JM (1993) Earthquake-resistant design with rubber. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelly JM, Konstantinidis D (2007) Low-cost seismic isolators for housing in highly-seismic developing countries. In: 10th world conference on seismic isolation, energy dissipation and active vibrations control of structures, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 28–31Google Scholar
  33. Kumar M, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2014) An advanced numerical model of elastomeric seismic isolation bearings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43:1955–1974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar M, Whittaker AS, Constantinou MC (2015) Seismic isolation of nuclear power plants using elastomeric bearings. Technical Report MCEER-15-0008Google Scholar
  35. Love JS, Tait MJ, Toopchi-Nezhad H (2011) A hybrid structural control system using a tuned liquid damper to reduce the wind induced motion of a base isolated structure. Eng Struct 33:738–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manzoori A, Toopchi-Nezhad H (2017) Application of an extended Bouc–Wen model in seismic response prediction of unbonded fiber-reinforced isolators. J Earthq Eng 21(1):87–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mishra HK, Igarashi A, Matsushima H (2013) Finite element analysis and experimental verification of the scrap tire rubber pad isolator. Bull Earthq Eng 11(2):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naeim F, Kelly JM (1999) Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou MC (1991) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of 3-D-base-isolated structures. J Struct Eng 117:2035–2054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osgooei PM, Tait MJ, Konstantinidis D (2017) Non-iterative computational model for fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators. Eng Struct 137:245–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russo G, Pauletta M (2013) Sliding instability of fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators in unbonded applications. Eng Struct 48:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shahzad M, Kamran A, Siddiqui MZ, Farhan M (2015) Mechanical characterization and FE modelling of a hyperelastic material. Mater Res 18:918–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simulia (2014) ABAQUS 6.14 user’s manual. Dassault Systems, ProvidenceGoogle Scholar
  44. Spizzuoco M, Calabrese A, Serino G (2014) Innovative low-cost recycled rubber-fiber reinforced isolator: experimental tests and finite element analyses. Eng Struct 76:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thuyet VN, Dutta A, Deb SK (2017) Evaluation of horizontal stiffness of fibre-reinforced elastomeric isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(11):1747–1767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Toopchi-Nezhad H (2014) Horizontal stiffness solutions for unbonded fiber reinforced elastomeric bearings. Struct Eng Mech 49:395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Toopchi-Nezhad H, Tait MJ, Drysdale RG (2008a) Testing and modeling of square carbon fiber-reinforced elastomeric seismic isolators. Struct Control Health Monit 15:876–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Toopchi-Nezhad H, Tait MJ, Drysdale RG (2008b) Lateral response evaluation of fiber-reinforced neoprene seismic isolators utilized in an unbonded application. J Struct Eng 134:1627–1637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Toopchi-Nezhad H, Tait MJ, Drysdale RG (2011) Bonded versus unbonded strip fiber reinforced elastomeric isolators: finite element analysis. Compos Struct 93:850–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Triantafillou TC (2001) Seismic retrofitting of structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. Prog Struct Mater Eng 3(1):57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valente M, Milani G (2018) Alternative retrofitting strategies to prevent the failure of an under-designed RC frame. Eng Fail Anal 89:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Van Engelen NC, Osgooei PM, Tait MJ, Konstantinidis D (2014) Experimental and finite element study on the compression properties of Modified Rectangular Fiber-Reinforced Elastomeric Isolators (MR-FREIs). Eng Struct 74:52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Engelen NC, Konstantinidis D, Tait MJ (2016) Structural and nonstructural performance of a seismically isolated building using stable unbonded fiber-reinforced elastomeric isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 45:421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmad Basshofi Habieb
    • 1
  • Marco Valente
    • 1
  • Gabriele Milani
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations