Advertisement

Axiomathes

pp 1–24 | Cite as

Styled Morphogeometry

  • Liliana AlbertazziEmail author
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The paper presents analysis of form (morphology) in different domains (biology, art, mathematics, experimental phenomenology, and philosophy). It draws on the commonalities and their potential unified classifications based on how forms subjectively appear in perception—as opposed to their standard specification in Euclidean geometry or other objective quantitative methods. The paper provides an overview aiming to offer elements for thought for researchers in various fields.

Keywords

Art Biology Consciousness Form Geometry Invariants Morphology Nature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Alessandro Minelli, Gabor Domokos, Osvaldo da Pos, Roberto Poli, and an anonymous reviewer for their fruitful comments.

References

  1. Albers J (2013) Interaction of color. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  2. Albertazzi L (2002) Towards a neo-aristotelian theory of continua. Elements of an empirical geometry. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Unfolding perceptual continua. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 29–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertazzi L (2004) Stereokinetic shapes and their shadows. Perception 33(12):1437–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albertazzi L (2013a) Experimental phenomenology. An introduction. In: Albertazzi L (ed) The Wiley Blackwell handbook of experimental phenomenology. Visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, New York, pp 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Albertazzi L (2013b) Appearances from an experimental viewpoint. In: Albertazzi L (ed) The Wiley Blackwell handbook of experimental phenomenology. Visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, New York, pp 267–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Albertazzi L (2015a) Spatial elements in visual awareness. Challenges for an intrinsic ‘geometry’ of the visible. In: Niveleau C-E, Métraux A (eds) The bounds of naturalism: experimental constraints and phenomenological requiredness, Special Issue of Philosophia Scientiae 19(3):95–125Google Scholar
  7. Albertazzi L (2015b) Introduction to L Albertazzi (ed) Morphologies in nature and art. Art Percept 3(3):213–219.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Albertazzi L (2018a) Brentano’s aristotelian concept of consciousness. In: Jacquette D (ed) The Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of consciousness. Bloomsbury, London.  https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474229043.0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Albertazzi L (2018b) Naturalising phenomenology. A must have? Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01933 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Albertazzi L, Canal L, Dadam J, Micciolo R (2014) The semantics of biological forms. Perception 43:1365–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Albertazzi L, Canal L, Micciolo R, Vescovi M (2015a) Calligraphy and Klee’s abstract painting: a study on categorical ambiguity. Art Percept 3(3):239–263.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Albertazzi L, Canal L, Micciolo R (2015b) Cross-modal associations between materic painting and classical Spanish music. Front Psychol 6:424.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Albertazzi L, Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A (2015c) Chromatic dimensions: earthy, watery, airy and fiery. Perception 44(10):1153–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615594700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Albertazzi L, Canal L, Ferrari F, Sitta S, Hachen I, Micciolo R (2016) Naturally biased associations between music and poetry. Perception 46(2):139–160.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616673851 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Albertazzi L, Rosa-Salva O, da Pos O, Sovrano VA (2017) Fish are sensitive to expansion-contraction colour effects. Anim Behav Cogn 4(3):349–364.  https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.04.03.12.2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Albertazzi L, Canal L, Hachen I, Micciolo R (2019) Lineoids. Nature and behaviour of a visual primitive experimentally tested (in preparation)Google Scholar
  17. Alberti Leon Battista (1435) De pictura. http://www.filosofico.net/albertidepictura.htm
  18. Aristotele (1986) De anima. (trans: Hett WS). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Aristotle (1980) Physics. (trans: Wicksteed PH, Cornford FM). Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Arnheim R (1954) Art and visual perception: a psychology of the creative eye. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Arnheim R (1988) The power of the center: a study of composition in the visual arts. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Barbet I, Fagot J (2002) Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio). Behav Brain Res 132:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bell JL (2000) Hermann Weyl on intuition and the continuum. Philos Math 8:259–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bell JL (2005) The continuous and the infinitesimal in mathematics and philosophy. Polimetrica S A, MilanGoogle Scholar
  25. Benussi V (1913) Psychologie der Zeitauffassung [Psychology of time apprehension]. Winter, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  26. Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bohm D (1965) The special theory of relativity. W A Benjamin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Brentano F (1979) Untersuchungen zur Sinnespsychologie [Researches on the psychology of sense], R M Chisholm, R Fabian (eds). Meiner, Hamburg (1rst German edn 1907, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig)Google Scholar
  29. Brentano F (1981) The theory of categories, R M Chisholm, N Guterman (eds). Nijhoff, Den Haag. (1rst German edn 1933, A Kastil (ed), Meiner, Leipzig)Google Scholar
  30. Brentano F (1988) Philosophical lectures on space, time and the continuum, S Körner, R M Chisholm (eds). Croom Helm, London (1rst German edn 1976, Meiner, Hamburg)Google Scholar
  31. Brentano F (1995a) Psychology from an empirical standpoint, McAlister L (ed). Routledge, London. (translation of the 2nd edn with an Introduction and notes by O Kraus, Leipzig 1924) (1rst German edn 1874, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig)Google Scholar
  32. Brentano F (1995b) Descriptive psychology, Müller B (ed). Routledge, London (1rst German edn 1982, Chisholm RM, Baumgartner W (eds). Meiner, Hamburg)Google Scholar
  33. Brouwer LEJ (1912) Intuitionisme en Formalisme, Inaugural address at the University of Amsterdam, Noordhoff, Groningen. (trans: 1984 In: Benacerraf P, Putam H (eds), Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 77–89Google Scholar
  34. Brouwer LEJ (1975) Collected works: 1. A Heyting (ed). North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  35. Bühler K (1933) Ausdruckstheorie. Das System an der Geschichte aufgezeigt [Theory of expression. The system shown on the history]. Verlag Gustav Fisher, JenaGoogle Scholar
  36. Burdach KF (1817) Die Aufgabe der Morphologie bey Eröffnung der königlichen anatomischen Anstalt in Königsberg geschrieben und mit Nachrichten über diese Anstalt begleitet. [On the task of morphology: written at the opening of the Royal Anatomical Institute in Königsberg and accompanied with news about this establishment]. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  37. Cantor G (1883) Grundlagen einer allgemeinen Mannigfaltikeitstheorie [Fundamentals of a general theory of manifolds]. Teubner, Leipzig. (trans: In: Ewald W (1996). From Kant to Hilbert. A source book in the foundations of mathematics, vol II. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 878–920Google Scholar
  38. Classen JP, Overbeeke CJ, Smets GJF (1995) Puzzling colours. Color Res Appl 20(6):3898–3960.  https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080200607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Coen E (2001) Goethe and the ABC model of flower development. Comptes Rendus III 324:523–530Google Scholar
  40. Coen ES, Carpenter R (1993) The metamorphosis of flowers. Plant Cell 5(10):1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. da Pos O (2019) The appearance of the point. Axiomathes, this issueGoogle Scholar
  42. da Pos O, Valenti V (2007) Warm and cold colours. In: Guanrong YE, Haisong X (eds) Proceedings of the midterm meeting of the international color science for industry. Color Association of Chin, Hangzhou, China, pp 41–44Google Scholar
  43. da Pos O, Viswanath D, Albertazzi L (2019) Color determinants of surface stratification (submitted)Google Scholar
  44. Dadam J, Albertazzi L, Canal L, da Pos O, Micciolo R (2012a) Morphological patterns and their colour. Percept Mot Skills 114:363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dadam J, Albertazzi L, Canal L, Micciolo R (2012b) Amodal completion of boundaries in coloured surfaces. Psychologia 5:227–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. De Rosa A (2008) The apocalypse of optics. The twin anamorphosis of Emmanuel Maignan and Jean-François Nicéron. http://hdl.handle.net/11578/2425
  47. Dedekind R (1872) Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen [Consistency and irrational numbers]. Vieweg, Braunschweig. (trans: In: Ewald W (1996). From Kant to Hilbert. A source book in the foundations of mathematics, vol II. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 756–779Google Scholar
  48. Dunning WV (1991) Changing images of pictorial space: a history of spatial illusion in painting. Syracuse University Press, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  49. Dürer A (1525) Underweysung der Messung, mit dem Zirckel und Richtscheyt, in Linien, Ebenen und ganzen Corporen [Instruction in measurement with compass and ruler, in lines, planes, and whole bodies]. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Underweysung_der_Messung#/media/File:Duerer_Underweysung_der_Messung_009.jpg
  50. Erkelens CJ (2015a) The extent of visual space inferred from perspective angles. i-Perception 6(1):5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1068/i0673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Erkelens CJ (2015b) Perception of perspective angles. i-Perception 6(3):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515593022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Erkelens CJ (2015c) The perspective structure of visual space. i-Perception 6(5):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515613672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Fortarezza A, Kimura A (1988) L’arte della calligrafia nel Giappone contemporaneo: Sho. [The art of calligraphy in modern Japan: Sho]. Olivetti, MilanGoogle Scholar
  54. Fraisse P (1963) The logic of time. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Fujita K (1997) Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species. Percept Psychophys 5:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Fujita K, Blough DS, Blough PM (1993) Effects of the inclination of context lines on perception of the Ponzo illusion by pigeons. Anim Learn Behav 21:29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gare A (2017) Chreods, homeorhesis and biofields: finding the right path for science trough daoism. In: Simeonov PL, Gare A, Matsuno K, Igamberdiev AU (eds) Prog Biophys Mol Biol 131:61–91. (Special issue: Integral Biomathics: The necessary conjunction of the Western and Eastern thought traditions for exploring the nature of mind and life).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.08.010
  58. Ghyka M (1977) The geometry of art and life. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  60. Gielis J (1996) Wiskundige superwormen bj bamboes. Newlerre of the Belgian Bamboo Society 13:20–26Google Scholar
  61. Gielis J (1999) Methods and devices for synthesizing and analyzing patterns using a novel mathematical operator. USPTO Patent Application N8(60/133):279Google Scholar
  62. Gielis J (2003) A generic geometric transformation that unifies a wide range of natural and abstract shape. Am J Bot 90(3):333–338.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.3.333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Gielis J (2017) The geometric beauty of plants. Atlantis Press, AntwerpCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Goethe J W (1790) Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu Erklären [Attempt to explain the metamorphosis of plants] Ettinger CW (ed), Gotha. (trans: 1946 by A Arber as Goethe’s botany, Chronica Botanica 10:67–115)Google Scholar
  65. Goodwin B (2007) Nature’s due: healing our fragmented culture. Floris Books, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  66. Gregory R (2009) Seeing through illusions. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Gundlach C, Macoubrey C (1931) The effect of color on apparent size. AJP 43:109–111.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1414243 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Haeckel EH (1866) Generelle Morphologie der Organismen [General morphology of organisms]. Reimer Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Haeckel EH (2004) Kunstformen der Natur [Art forms in nature]. Prestel, MunichGoogle Scholar
  70. Harada S (2011) Moon by the window. The calligraphy and Zen insights of Shodo Harada. [trans: Storandt PD, Williams T, Lago JS]. Wisdom Publications, BostonGoogle Scholar
  71. Hering E (1964) Outlines of a theory of the light sense. (trans: Hurvich LM, Jameson D). Harvard University Press, Cambridge. (1st German edn 1920)Google Scholar
  72. Heyting A (1931) Die intuitionistische Grundlegung der Mathematik [The intuitionistic foundation of mathematics]. Erkenntnis 2:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Heyting A (1971) Intuitionism. An introduction. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  74. Hicks J (1966) Piet Hein bestrides art and science [Piet Hein straddling between art and science]. LifeGoogle Scholar
  75. Hideo M (2000) Art of Japanese writing and calligraphy: Kanji. Hiragana. Katakana. Authorhouse, USGoogle Scholar
  76. Hilbert D (1984) On the infinite. In: Benacerraf P, Putnam H (eds) Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 183–201.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cb09781139171519.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hogarth W (1753) The analysis of beauty. Written with a view of fixing the fluctuating ideas of taste. John Reeves, LondonGoogle Scholar
  78. Husserl E (1982) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. (trans: Kersten F, Nijhoff M). The Hague. (1st German edn 1913)Google Scholar
  79. Husserl E (2001) Logical investigations, vols. 2 (trans: Findlay JN) Routledge, London. (1st German edn 1900-1)Google Scholar
  80. Itten J (1963) Kunst der Farbe [The art of color: The subjective experience and objective rationale of color]. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Jóźwiak P, Rewicz T, Pabis K (2015) Taxonomic etymology—in search of inspiration. Zoo Keys 513:143–160Google Scholar
  82. Kandinsky W (1911) Über das Geistige in the Kunst, Insbesondere in der Malerei. Benteli, Bern. (trans: Sadler MTH 2004, Concerning the spiritual in art. Kessinger Publishing, Whitefish)Google Scholar
  83. Kandinsky W (1926) Punkt Linie zur Fläche. Bern, Benteli. (trans: 1947, Point and line to plane. Contribution to the analysis of the pictorial elements. Solomon Guggenheim Foundation, New York)Google Scholar
  84. Kanizsa G (1979) Organization in vision: essays on Gestalt perception. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Kanizsa G (1983) Grammatica del vedere [The grammar of seeing]. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  86. Kanizsa G (1991) Vedere e pensare [Seeing and thinking]. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  87. Kanizsa G, Vicario GB (1965) Caratteri espressivi ed intenzionali dei movimenti: la percezione della reazione (Expressive and intentional characteristics of movements: the perception of the reaction). Atti del XV Congresso di Psicologia Italiana, Torino, pp 318–321Google Scholar
  88. Katz D (1935) The world of colour. Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. Kelley LA, Kelley JL (2014) Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behav Ecol 25(3):450–463.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kerszberg P, Bernet R, Taminiaux J, Waldenfends B (2007) Perseverance and adjustment: On Weyl’s phenomenological philosophy of nature. In: Boy L, Kerszberg P, Patras F (eds) Rediscovering phenomenology: phenomenological essays on mathematical beings, physical reality, perception and consciousness. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Kimchi R (1992) Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm. A critical review. Psychol Bull 112:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kitaoka A, Ashida H (2007) A variant of the anomalous motion illusion based upon contrast and visual latency. Perception 36(7):1019–1035.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p5362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Klages L (1964) Grundlegung der Wissenschaft vom Ausdruck [Foundation of the science of expression]. Bouvier, BonnGoogle Scholar
  94. Klee P (1961) The thinking eye. Lund Humphries, LondonGoogle Scholar
  95. Klee P (1965) Pädagogisches Skizzenbuch [Pedagogical sketch book], Neue Bauhaus Bücher. In: Wingler HM (ed) Gebr. Mann Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  96. Klee P (1970) Unendliche Naturgeschichte. Prinzipielle Ordnung der bildnerischen Mittel verbunden mit Naturstudium, und konstruktive Kompositionswege. Form- und Gestaltungslehre [Endless natural history. Principal order of the pictorial means, combined with studies of nature and constructive ways of composition. Form and design theory], Spiller J (ed), Paul Klee Stiftung, Kunstmuseum Bern, vol 2. Basel-StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  97. Klee P (1979) Beiträge zur bildnerischen Formlehre [Contribution to the visual form theory], Glaesermer J (ed). Paul Klee Stiftung, Kunstmuseum Bern, vol 2, Basel-StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  98. Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A, Albertazzi L, Wagemans J (2015a) Relief articulation techniques. Art Percept 3:151–171.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Koenderink JJ, van Doorn A, Wagemans J (2015b) Deploying the mental eye. i-Perception 6(5):1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695156007710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Koffka K (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace, and World, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  101. Lavater JK (1775–1778) Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe [Physiognomic fragments for the promotion of human knowledge and philanthropy], 4 vols. Winterthur, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  102. Lenoir T (1982) The strategy of life: teleology and mechanics in nineteenth century German biology. The Netherlands, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  103. Leon Battista Alberti (2011) On painting. A new translation and critical edition by R Sinisgalli, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (1437)Google Scholar
  104. Leonardo da Vinci (1651) Trattato della pittura, Rafaelle Du Fresne (ed). Parigi. https://archive.org/details/gri_33125008484301/page/n7
  105. Lewin K (1969) Grundzüge der topologischen Psychologie [Main features of topological psychology], R Falk, F Winnefeld (eds). Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
  106. Lipps Th (1897) Raumaesthetik und geometrisch-optische Täuschungen [The aesthetic of space and geometric-optical illusions]. Barth, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  107. Longo G (2007) Mathematical concepts and physical objects. In: Boy L, Kerszberg P, Patras F (eds) Rediscovering phenomenology: phenomenological essays on mathematical beings, physical reality, perception and consciousness. Springer, New York, pp 195–227.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5881-3_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Mahnke D (1977) From Hilbert to Husserl: first introduction to phenomenology, especially that of formal mathematics. Stud Hist Philos Sci 8:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Mancosu P (2010) The adventure of reason: interplay between philosophy of mathematics and mathematical logic, 1900–1940. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Mancosu P, Ryckman T (2002) The correspondence between Hermann Weyl and Oskar Becker. Philos Math 10:130–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman and Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  112. Metelli F (1941) Un metodo per lo studio sperimentale dell’identità fenomenica [A method for the experimental study of phenomenal identity]. Rivista di psicologia 37:99–105Google Scholar
  113. Metelli F (1960) Morfologia dei fenomeni di completamento della percezione visive [Morpholpogy of phenomena of completion of visual perception]. In: Weinhandl F (ed) Gestalthaftes Sehen: Ergebnisse und Aufgaben der Morphologie [Gestalt vision: results and tasks of morphology]. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesallschaft, Darmstadt, pp 266–278Google Scholar
  114. Metzger W (2006) Laws of seeing (trans: Spillmann L, Lehar S, Stromeyer M, Wertheimer M. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  115. Michotte A (1950) On phenomenal permanence. Facts and theories. Acta Psychol 7:293–322. (Repr. 1991, In: Thinès G, Costall A, Butterworth G (eds) Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 117–121)Google Scholar
  116. Minelli A (2003) The development of animal form. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Minelli A (2018) Plant evolutionary developmental biology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Minelli A (2019) An evo-devo perspective on analogy in biology. Philosophies 4(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies401000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Morris W (ed) (2012) The lesser arts of life (1882). In: The collected works of William Morris. Hopes and fears for art. Lectures on arts and industry, vol XXII. Longmans-Green, London, pp 235–269Google Scholar
  120. Müller-Lyer FC (1889) Optische Urteilstäuschungen [Optical judgment illusions]. Archiv Anat Physiol Phys Abt Suppl Band 2:263–270Google Scholar
  121. Nagayama N (2012) Shodo. The way of calligraphy. Lesson by Nagayama Norio Sensei. Digital Index. E-bookGoogle Scholar
  122. Nakamura N, Fujita K, Ushitani T, Miyata H (2006) Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 120:252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2008) Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34(3):375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Nakamura N, Watanabe S, Fujita K (2009) Further analysis of perception of reversed Müller-Lyer figures for pigeons (Columba livia). Percept Mot Skills 108:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Needham J (1956) Science and civilisation in China. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  126. Needham J (1969) The grand titration: science and society in East and West. Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  127. Newman SA, Bhat R (2009) Dynamical patterning modules: a “pattern language” for development and evolution of multicellular form. Int J Dev Biol 53:693–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Niklas KJ, Kutschera U (2016) From Goethe’s plant archetype via Haeckel’s biogenetic law to plant evo-devo. Theory Biosci 136(1–2):49–57Google Scholar
  129. Pedoe D (1976) Geometry and visual arts. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  130. Pepperber IM, Vicinay J, Cavanagh P (2008) Processing of the Müller-Lyer illusion by a grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Perception 37:765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Pinna B (2013) Illusion and illusoriness: new perceptual issues and new phenomena. In: Albertazzi L (ed) Handbook of experimental phenomenology: visual perception of shape, space and appearance. Wiley, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118329016.ch13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Pinna B, Tanca M (2018) Perceptual organization reconsidered in the light of the watercolor illusion: the problem of perception of holes and the object-hole effect. J Vis 8(7):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1167/8.7.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Ponzo M (1912) Rapports de contraste angulaire et l’appréciation de grandeur des astres à l’horizon. Arch Ital Biol 58:327–329Google Scholar
  134. Prusinkiewicz P, Erasmus Y, Lane B, Harder LD, Coen E (2007) Evolution and development of inflorescence architecture. Science 316:1452–1456.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1140429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Purdy DM (1931) Spectral hue as a function of intensity. AJP 43:541–559.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1415157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rausch E (1966) Das Eigenschaftsproblem in der GT der Wahrnehmung [The quality problem in the GT of Perception]. In: Metzger W (ed) Handbuch der Psychologie [Handbook of psychology]. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp 866–953Google Scholar
  137. Rensink RA (2000) Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vis Res 40(10–12):1469–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Rensink RA (2002) Change detection. Annu Rev Psychol 53:245–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark J (1997) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 8:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Riegner M (2013) Ancestor of the new archetypal biology: Goethe’s dynamic typology as a model for contemporary evolutionary developmental biology. St Hist Philos Biol Biomed. Sci 44:735–744.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Rosa Salva O, Rugani R, Cavazzana A, Regolin L, Vallortigara G (2013) Perception of the Ebbinghaus illusion in four-day-old domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 16:895–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Rubin E (1921) Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren [Visually perceived figures]. Gyldendals, CopenaghenGoogle Scholar
  143. Rubin E (1950) Visual figures apparently incompatible with geometry. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 7:365–387Google Scholar
  144. Ruskin J (1857) The laws of Fésole. The elements of drawing. London, Smith, Elder & Co., London. (Repr. 1971, Dover, Toronto, Canada)Google Scholar
  145. Shapiro AG, Teodorovic D (2017) The Oxford compendium of visual illusions. Oxford University Press, New York NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Steiner R (1995) Kunst und Kunsterkenntnis. Grundlagen einer neuen Ästhetik. Aufsätze und Vorträge [Art and art knowledge. Basics of a new aesthetics. Essays and lectures], with a Nachworth by G Metken. Rudolf Steiner Verlag, DornachGoogle Scholar
  147. Stevens J (1996) Sacred calligraphy of the East. Echo Point Books & Media, BrattleboroGoogle Scholar
  148. Suganuma E, Pessoa VF, Monge-Fuentes V, Castro BM, Tavares MCH (2007) Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav Brain Res 182:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Suzuki Y (2005) An introduction to Japanese calligraphy. Search Press, Tunbridge WellsGoogle Scholar
  150. Swedenborg E (1734) Principia rerum naturalium. (Repr. Basel 1954)Google Scholar
  151. Tedford WH, Bergquist SL, Flynn WE (1977) The size-color illusion. J GenPsychol 97:145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1977.9918511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Thom R (1972) Structural stability and morphogenesis. Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  153. Thompson DW (1961) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  154. Timney B, Keil K (1996) Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception 25:1121–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Tudusciuc O, Nieder A (2010) Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans. Exp Brain Res 207:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. van der Velde H (1902) Die Linie [The line]. Die Zukunft 10(49):385–388Google Scholar
  157. van Oystaeyen F, Gielis J, Ceulemens R (1996) Mathematical aspects of plant modelling. Scripta Botanica Belgica 13:7–27Google Scholar
  158. van Tonder G (2015) Perceptual aspects of visual stylization. Art Perc 3(3):221–238.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22134913-00002039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Veronese G (1891) Fondamenti di geometria a più dimensioni e a più specie di unità rettilinee esposti in forma elementare. Lezioni per la scuola di magistero in matematica [Fundamentals of multi-dimensional geometry and to more species of rectilinear units exhibited in an elementary form. Lessons for the School of Teaching in Mathematics]. Tipografia del seminario, Padova. (http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=math;idno=01460002)
  160. Vicario GB (2011) Illusioni ottico-geometriche. Una rassegna dei problemi [Optical-geometric illusions. A review of the problems]. Istituto Veneto di Lettere, Scienze ed Arti, VeneziaGoogle Scholar
  161. Vishwanath D (2014) Towards a new theory of stereopsis. Psychol Rev 121(2):151–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. von Bezold W (1874) Die Farbenlehre im Hinblick auf Kunst und Kunstgewerbe [Color theory in arts and crafts]. (trans: Koehler SR). Westermann, BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  163. von Helmholtz H (1962) Helmholtz’ treatise on physiological optics. (trans: Southall JPC). Dover, New York. (1st German edn 1867)Google Scholar
  164. von Hildebrand A (1893) Das Problem der Form in der bildenden Kunst [The problem of form in visual art]. Heitz & Mündel, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  165. von Linné C (1735) Systema Naturae per regna tria Naturae secundum classes, ordines, genera, species. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/542#/summary
  166. Wackermann J (2010) Geometric–optical illusions: a pedestrian’s view of the phenomenal landscape. In: Bastianelli A, Vidotto G (eds) Fechner Day 2010. International Society for Psychophysics, Padova, pp 171–176Google Scholar
  167. Waddington CH (1962) The nature of life. Atheneum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  168. Waddington CH (ed) (1969) Towards a theoretical biology, 2 Sketches. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  169. Warden CJ, Baar J (1929) The Müller-Lyer illusion in the ring dove (Turtur risorius). J Comp Psychol 9(4):275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Warner KA, Rudall PJ, Frohlich MW (2009) Environmental control of sepalness and petalness in perianth organs of waterlilies: a new Mosaic Theory for the evolutionary origin of a differentiated perianth. J Exp Bot 60(12):3559–3574.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Wertheimer M (1922) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I. Psychologische Forschung,4, 47–58. (Partial trans. 2001, Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis WE (ed) A source book of Gestalt psychology, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, pp 12–15)Google Scholar
  172. Wertheimer M (1923) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung 4, 301–350. (Partial trans. 2001, Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis WE (ed) A source book of Gestalt psychology, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, pp 71–88)Google Scholar
  173. Weyl H (1949) Philosophy of mathematics and natural science. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Weyl H (1987) The continuum: a critical examination of the foundation of analysis (trans: Pollard S, Bole T). Thomas Jefferson University Press, Kirkeville (First German edn 1918)Google Scholar
  175. Winslow CN (1933) Visual illusions in the chick. Arch Physiol Biochem 153:1–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Experimental Phenomenology (LabExP)University of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations