Advertisement

Transmission of images by unmanned underwater vehicles

  • Alice Danckaers
  • Mae L. SetoEmail author
S.I. 201: Robot Communication Challenges
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Special Issue on Robot Communication Challenges: Real-World Problems, Systems, and Methods

Abstract

As an acoustic communications medium, water is characterized by frequency dependent attenuation, short range, very low bandwidth, scattering, and multi-path. It is generally difficult to acoustically communicate even terse messages underwater much less images. For the naval mine counter-measures mission, there is value in transmitting images of mine-like objects, acquired by side-scan sonar on-board unmanned underwater vehicles, to the above-water operator for review. The contribution of this paper is a methodology and implementation, based on vector quantization, to compress and transmit snippets of side-scan sonar images from underway unmanned underwater vehicles to an operator. The work has been validated through controlled indoor tank tests and several at-sea trials. The fidelity of the received images is such that trained operators can recognize targets in the received images as well as they would have in the original images. Future work investigates machine learning to improve the compression basis and psycho-visual studies for the specialized skill of feature recognition in sonar images.

Keywords

Underwater communications Sonar image transmissions Unmanned underwater vehicle Naval mine counter-measures 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project is grateful for the timely and helpful advice and assistance of the WHOI Acoustic Communications Group.

References

  1. Atallah, A. M., Ali, H. S. & Abdallah, M. I. (2016). An integrated system for underwater wireless image transmission. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on microelectronics (pp. 169–172).Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharyya, P., Mitra, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2014). Vector quantization based image compression using generalized improved fuzzy clustering. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on control, instrumentation, energy and communication (pp. 662–666).Google Scholar
  3. Bin, L., & Qinggang, M. (2013). An improved SPIHT wavelet transform in the underwater acoustic image compression. In Proceedings of 2013 2nd international conference on measurement, information and control (ICMID) (Vol. 2, pp. 1315–1318).Google Scholar
  4. Chen, W., Yuan, F., Cheng, E., & Lin, W. (2017). Subjective and objective quality evaluation of sonar images for underwater acoustic transmission. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 176–180).Google Scholar
  5. Committee for Mine Warfare Assessment, Naval Studies Board, National Research Council, Naval Mine Warfare: Operational and Technical Challenges for Naval Forces, http://acomms.whoi.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2014/09/401040-SIG-Micromodem-Software-Interface-Guide.pdf. (2001).
  6. DeBortoli, R., Nicolai, A., Li, F., & Hollinger, G. (2017). Assessing perception quality in sonar images using global context. In Proceedings of Intelligent Robots and Systems Conference (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  7. Eigen Library for Matrix Algebra in C, https://www.quantstart.com/articles/Eigen-Library-for-Matrix-Algebrain-C. Accessed December 2016.
  8. Ferdowski, S., Voloshynovskiy, S., & Kostadinov, D. (2017). A multi-layer image representation using regularized residual quantization: Application to compressing and de-noising. In Proceedings of the 2017 international conference on Image Processing (pp. 2697–2701).Google Scholar
  9. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2014). Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. In Proceedings of NIPS Deep Learning Working (pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
  10. Huffman, D. A. (1952). A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. In Proceedings of I.R.E. (pp. 1098–1101).Google Scholar
  11. Kalwa, J., & Madsen, A. L. (2004). Sonar image quality assessment for an autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings World Automation Congress ( Vol. 15, No. 33–38).Google Scholar
  12. Li, J., Wang, W., Li, K., Meng, W., & Guo, X. (2018). Application of image quality assessment in marine biological density prediction. In Proceedings of Chinese Control and Decision Conference (pp. 6658–6661).Google Scholar
  13. Liu, P., & Li, G. (2013). An improved SPIHT algorithm for image compression in low bit rate. Communications and Network, 5, 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moszynski, M., Chybicki, A., Kulawiak, M., & Lubniewski, Z. (2013). A novel method for archiving multibeam sonar data with emphasis on efficient record size reduction and Storage. Polish Maritime Research, 20(1), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, C., Wang, R. Y., & Singh, H. (2010). Seafloor image compression with large tilesize vector quantization. In IEEE/OES autonomous underwater vehicles (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  16. Nams, D., & Seto, M. L. (2015). On-line adaptation of underwater acoustic transmission rates to optimize communications for collaborative AUV missions. In Proceedings of 2015 MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
  17. Purvis, M. (Ed.). Indigo—ROS wiki, edited 2014-08-22, http://wiki.ros.org/indigo. Accessed May 2017.
  18. Said, A., & Pearlman, W. A. (1996). A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 6(3), 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shen, J. & Huang, H.C. (2010). An adaptive image compression method based on vector quantization. In IEEE 1st international conference on pervasive computing, signal processing and applications (pp. 377–381).Google Scholar
  20. Skodras, A., Christopoulos, C., & Ebrahimi, T. (2001). The JPG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(5), 36–58.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Wallace, G. K. (1992). The jpeg still picture compression standard. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 38(1), xviii-xxxiv.Google Scholar
  22. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. WHOI Acoustic Communications Group: Micro-Modem Software Interface Guide, Document ID: 401040, Version 3.25. (2014).Google Scholar
  24. Yang, M., & Bourbakis, N. (2005). An overview of lossless digital image compression techniques. In IEEE (pp. 1099–1102).Google Scholar
  25. Zhang, Y., Li, Q. Z., & Negahdaripour, S. (2015). Seafloor image compression using hybrid wavelets and directional filter banks. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference (pp. 1–9).Google Scholar
  26. Zhang, Y., Negahdaripour, S., & Li, Q. (2016). Low bit-rate compression of underwater imagery based on adaptive hybrid wavelets and directional filter banks. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 47, 96–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ENSTA BretagneBrestFrance
  2. 2.Defence R&D CanadaDartmouthCanada

Personalised recommendations